[pd] 100000hz+
i just made a synth which makes some really nice tones when i feed it really high frequencies. (midi notes 150-300) question is, will this sound the same on all computers, or do different systems handle such high frequencies differently? ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [pd] 100000hz+
Hallo! i just made a synth which makes some really nice tones when i feed it really high frequencies. (midi notes 150-300) question is, will this sound the same on all computers, or do different systems handle such high frequencies differently? Hm ... it depends in the sampling frequency. The frequencies are mirrowed at sr/2, so if the sr is the same it should work (but I haven't tried it ...) LG Georg ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [pd] 100000hz+
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:59 +0900, hard off wrote: i just made a synth which makes some really nice tones when i feed it really high frequencies. (midi notes 150-300) question is, will this sound the same on all computers, or do different systems handle such high frequencies differently? it will mainly depend on the sampling rate, since i guess, the sounds that you produce contain aliasing artifacts ... cheers ... tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk A paranoid is a man who knows a little of what's going on. William S. Burroughs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [pd] 100000hz+
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:48:32PM +0900, hard off wrote: this is a bummer, cos i am getting a really nice palette of sounds here, and i wanted to share the patch oh well, i'll stick to normal midi notes for that i guess. Don't be too bummed out. Given what's been said here I'm not sure exactly how this happened, but I made the types of sounds you're talking about (an [osc~] at +127 midi) and recorded them to a wav file and imported that wav file into a .XM file and then played that .XM file back on a gameboy advance, and it sounded pretty much how it did in the original instance, despite the fact that it was playing back at a different sampling rate and underwent conversions between different sample rates in the process. If I was you I would experiment with your sound on some different systems before giving up. I guess sometimes practice confounds theory. Best, Chris. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mccormick.cx ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [pd] 100000hz+
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 06:54:27AM +0100, padawan12 wrote: This is as expected. What Chris says is no surprise. If you render the output to a .wav file it is captured as a snapshot and the sample rate no longer has any effect (other than to change the overall playback rate). The problem others were trying to explain is that the synthesis patch is not independent of sample rate, so using the same Pd patch at different sample rates will produce different results. If you're recording it the problem doesn't exist. I am not sure if I understand this distinction correctly. If I use Pd at 44100Hz to generate a high frequency wave that aliases, and save it as a 44100Hz wave file, shouldn't that wave file be subjected to different aliasing if I play it back at say 22050Hz? What about if I upsample it to 96kHz? Will the aliasing weirdness disappear if the tone I played was below 96kHz? Or is it somehow baked into the wav file. I think I am out of my depth here. Chris. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mccormick.cx ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
