Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
> So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a > faster mac > or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the > GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been > having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData? Not sure at whom that is directed, but I'm definitely not saying that. Post a trivial example patch on the tracker and I'll have a look and see if I can fix it: https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data/issues -Jonathan On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: 2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes : I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the current selection inside an abstraction. This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. How crazy am I? cheers __ _ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list -- http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //+358403703659 // http://lackluster.org // skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage esaru...@gmail.com //http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com // http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial // ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
On 10/03/2017 07:08 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote: > That feature doesn't currently exist, though it's fairly trivial to > implement. (I believe > DesireData had it.) Pd has it as well: https://git.iem.at/pd-gui/punish gfmrdsa IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a faster mac or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData? On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > 2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes : >> >> >> I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates >> the current selection inside an abstraction. >> > > This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork > 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me > into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. > How crazy am I? > > cheers > > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > > -- http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659 // http://lackluster.org // skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage esaru...@gmail.com // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com // http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial // ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes : > > > I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates > the current selection inside an abstraction. > This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. How crazy am I? cheers ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
> I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo, > arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to > automatically encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr > data? I saw something once where you could select > a portion of the patch and do it. That feature doesn't currently exist, though it's fairly trivial to implement. (I believe DesireData had it.) I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the current selection inside an abstraction. -Jonathan > cheers___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] why not Purr Data?
> I will let you know as soon as I'm on a machine that I can install a > pre-compiled deb package of Purr Data on. Unfortunately, my personal > laptop is still running Ubuntu 16.04 i386 because I've been upgrading > for a couple of years and I never installed from scratch. Oh, I see. No rush, then. I thought you were talking about recent crashes. Best,Jonathan ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo, arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to automatically encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr data? I saw something once where you could select a portion of the patch and do it. cheers 2017-10-03 6:59 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli : > On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote: > > > > > > This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the > > -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently > > offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly > > inconsistent behaviors... > > Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with > Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches > I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now. > > Roman > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > > ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] How to build a Pd project like an application ?
Hi, I choose the "Egregore" patches way to share crossplatfom projects : - a startup script (.sh for mac and linux, .bat for windows) - pd from Miller Puckette Web site (compiled for linux) - ~20 externals download with Deken from 3 differents computers : win7/8/10 + mac osX + ubuntu ( ++ gaga ++ ) - project : malinette + tclplugins First attemps here : http://reso-nance.org/public/pd-malinette/test05/ If someone want to try... Best Jérôme ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote: > > > This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the > -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently > offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly > inconsistent behaviors... Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now. Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] why not Purr Data?
On 2017-10-02 18:11, Patrice Colet wrote: > Purr Data looks like a continuity of pd-extended, anyway all pd versions > are obsolete since they aren't fully 64bit compatible. weird i've been using Pd on 64bit systems almost exclusively for the last 10 years. what makes you think that they are not fully 64bit compatible? fgamsdr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list