Re: PESO Perfect Landing
Nice action catch and composition, Paul. J Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 23, 2018, at 7:27 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > > I really like the posture you caught the bird in. Fine image in all > respects. > > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> https://www.photo.net/photo/18502966/Arrival >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO Perfect Landing
I really like the posture you caught the bird in. Fine image in all respects. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM Paul Stenquist wrote: > https://www.photo.net/photo/18502966/Arrival > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESOs (4) - Cemetery Walk
The third photo, withthe tall tree stumps would be especially powerful in black and white, I think. ann On 10/23/2018 8:11 PM, Rick Womer wrote: I took my camera for a walk late yesterday afternoon through Woodland Cemetery, which is just a few blocks from our house. It was established in 1840 on the grounds of a grand colonial estate, and has graves dating from then. A non-profit foundation now owns the land, which is a national historic landmark, and a non-profit corporation operates the cemetery. This has improved the maintenance a lot in the last few years. https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/PESOs-2017/Cemetery-Walk-10-18/ (K-5, DA 17-70) Comments appreciated! Rick -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESOs (4) - Cemetery Walk
At 08:11 PM 10/23/2018, Rick Womer wrote: >I took my camera for a walk late yesterday afternoon through Woodland Cemetery That was a pleasure to see, as one of my interests is gravestone photography. I am still gearing up to take professional quality gravestone photos. To get an idea of the results I am trying to achieve visit the Farber Gravestone Collection of the American Antiquarian Association at: http://www.davidrumsey.com/farber/ Dale H. Cook, Member, NEHGS, AGS, MA Soc. of Mayflower Descendants; Plymouth Co. MA Coordinator for the USGenWeb Project Administrator of https://plymouthcolony.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESOs (4) - Cemetery Walk
I took my camera for a walk late yesterday afternoon through Woodland Cemetery, which is just a few blocks from our house. It was established in 1840 on the grounds of a grand colonial estate, and has graves dating from then. A non-profit foundation now owns the land, which is a national historic landmark, and a non-profit corporation operates the cemetery. This has improved the maintenance a lot in the last few years. https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/PESOs-2017/Cemetery-Walk-10-18/ (K-5, DA 17-70) Comments appreciated! Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: a new camera ...
On 23/10/18, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: >This is a new take on the "M-mount digital camera" that I saw on Leica >Rumors: https://pixii.fr. Interesting! Thanks for the headsup. Yer CL is sure perty though ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and || (O) |Live Broadcast News -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO Perfect Landing
https://www.photo.net/photo/18502966/Arrival -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: a new camera ...
That's kinda what I was thinking too. Seems a handy size... we'll see what comes of it. G > On Oct 23, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote: > > Looks interesting. It might be a good camera for cycling tours, with a couple > of Voigtlander lenses. > >> On 23 Oct 2018, at 15:02, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >> Slightly off-topic for PDML, but I thought BobW, Cotty, and maybe a couple >> others might be interested. >> >> --- >> This is a new take on the "M-mount digital camera" that I saw on Leica >> Rumors: https://pixii.fr. >> >> Rangefinder, manual focus and exposure, no LCD, 256G built-in memory only, >> WiFi connect for data transfer, etc. They don't list a sensor format and >> Mpixel yet, but rumor has it that it's an APS-C format with 12 to 16 >> Mpixels. Another information update is supposedly due soon. >> >> Could be a pretty neat camera if it pans out and gets produced. Kind of an >> updated, modernized take on the Ricoh GXR with M-mount camera unit >> fitted—the best non-Leica M-mount camera there's been so far. Of course, >> that was an EVF camera which meant it was more versatile lens-wise but its >> lifespan was tied to the quality of the EVF. This is an optical finder with >> a rangefinder, so you're limited to Leica M-mount lenses for focusing. >> >> One of these with a Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limited would be pretty darn neat. >> :-) >> >> G >> — >> No matter where you go, there you are. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: a new camera ...
Looks interesting. It might be a good camera for cycling tours, with a couple of Voigtlander lenses. > On 23 Oct 2018, at 15:02, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > Slightly off-topic for PDML, but I thought BobW, Cotty, and maybe a couple > others might be interested. > > --- > This is a new take on the "M-mount digital camera" that I saw on Leica > Rumors: https://pixii.fr. > > Rangefinder, manual focus and exposure, no LCD, 256G built-in memory only, > WiFi connect for data transfer, etc. They don't list a sensor format and > Mpixel yet, but rumor has it that it's an APS-C format with 12 to 16 Mpixels. > Another information update is supposedly due soon. > > Could be a pretty neat camera if it pans out and gets produced. Kind of an > updated, modernized take on the Ricoh GXR with M-mount camera unit fitted—the > best non-Leica M-mount camera there's been so far. Of course, that was an EVF > camera which meant it was more versatile lens-wise but its lifespan was tied > to the quality of the EVF. This is an optical finder with a rangefinder, so > you're limited to Leica M-mount lenses for focusing. > > One of these with a Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limited would be pretty darn neat. :-) > > G > — > No matter where you go, there you are. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: The Future of Photography is Code
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 02:46:25PM +, Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > >En martes, 23 de octubre de 2018 16:12:45 CEST, Daniel J. Matyola > > escribi??: > > https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/Dan > Matyolahttp://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola-- > > > Very interesting and true. Thanks. > I have a friend who has a smart phone review website and he shows me the > phone camera outputs from time to time... All the relevant improvements are > made by software. One of the last ones was a picture taken in low light that > used multiple exposure in order to remove the blue cast of an object > illuminated by an (almost only) blue light source. A sort of HDR for white > balance. The result is amazing: > https://www.teknofilo.com/analisis-pixel-3-xl/4 > > (in Spanish though) Technology helps with translation, too ... (I just dropped the URL into Google Translate to view it in English) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Saverne
Thanks Ken, Dan, and all the others who commented. Rick > On Oct 22, 2018, at 10:16 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > > Thanks Ken, Dan, > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 19:24 Ken Waller wrote: > A very photogenic area nicely captured > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > - Original Message - > From: "Rick Womer" > Subject: PESO - Saverne > > > > Saverne is a pleasant town of about 11,000 souls, just south of the Voges > > and 75 km from the eastern tip of France. We went there because the last > > of our iPhone cables had quit working, but it was a very pleasant place to > > spend some time. > > > > The town lies along the Rhine-Marne canal: > > > > https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/organize/AMS-to-CDG/Saverne/i-626Zzpt > > > > Comments appreciated! > > > > Rick > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: November PUG countdown
Hopefully!.. And I hope so did Mark C. But I am rather intrigued to see if something shows up from Bruce. ;-) Cheers, Igor ann sanfedele Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:04:48 -0700 wrote: ya think? ann On 10/22/2018 4:25 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 22/10/18, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed: Theme: "Upon closer examination". Submit here: http://pug.komkon.org/submit/ Jostein's got this ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: a new camera ...
Thanks for your wonderfully upbeat response. =8^/ Epson R-D1 cameras were a bit early on the curve, and Epson decided not to put any more development in when Cosina was in the process of closing down the body production it was based on. It was the only other digital rangefinder camera ever made, and is still sought after by some enthusiasts despite being 12 years out of date with respect to sensor technology. The Ricoh GXR with M-mount camera unit was the only other non-Leica camera made specifically with a sensor tailored for M-mount lenses .. you didn't adapt Leica lenses to it, that's what it was made for, in contrast to all the other EVF cameras on the market with the exception of Leica's own. The issue with it was that Ricoh made it and its system too complex, making it difficult to market, sell (due to the price), and maintain development for. It did a superb job with a very large range of M-mount lenses, certainly more than any of the other third party M-mount adaptations. Many Leica enthusiasts still have and use the GXR, and wish Ricoh would have developed a better EVF and higher resolution sensor for it. But it remains an EVF camera, and many still want an optical rangefinder. I figure if the PIXII makes it to production, whether APS-C or FF, it has a good shot at a reasonable niche audience if it performs well and is reliable. I doubt it's going to take the world by storm and become a new standard that everyone aspires to. But I see no reason not to be optimistic that it gets into production and satisfies a community of enthusiast users. Note that I won't be one of them. I have my CL and M-D Leicas already and don't need another M-mount camera. :-) That Pentax-L 43mm Limited remains interesting to me, yes, for both my M-D and CL bodies. It's just a bit hard to come by and a touch pricey but I might go for one, eventually. G On Oct 23, 2018, at 7:29 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: >> One of these with a Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limited would be pretty darn neat. >> :-) > > So is a Leica pretty much any of them, or even a Epson RD1. > > I have a prediction, it doesn't have the name Leica on it, and it doesn't > have a red dot, based on that I predict this camera will tank in the market, > because it will require a Leica sized price and really no one really likes a > range finder, (well I like rangefinders, but only in comparison to cameras > that have scale focusing), if they have another choice, unless it has the > name Leica on it, and there are lots of rangefinder like cameras with EVFs to > choose from these days. > > I also predict this for the new Zenit M, because, the Zenit was an > inexpensive camera that actually cost more to make than it sold for, because > the Soviet Union really needed Hard western currency. At $5000-$7000 it just > isn't worth that much for a Russian branded novelty. If it costs like a > Leica, you might as well buy a Leica. > > >> On 10/23/2018 10:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> Slightly off-topic for PDML, but I thought BobW, Cotty, and maybe a couple >> others might be interested. >> >> --- >> This is a new take on the "M-mount digital camera" that I saw on Leica >> Rumors: https://pixii.fr. >> >> Rangefinder, manual focus and exposure, no LCD, 256G built-in memory only, >> WiFi connect for data transfer, etc. They don't list a sensor format and >> Mpixel yet, but rumor has it that it's an APS-C format with 12 to 16 >> Mpixels. Another information update is supposedly due soon. >> >> Could be a pretty neat camera if it pans out and gets produced. Kind of an >> updated, modernized take on the Ricoh GXR with M-mount camera unit >> fitted—the best non-Leica M-mount camera there's been so far. Of course, >> that was an EVF camera which meant it was more versatile lens-wise but its >> lifespan was tied to the quality of the EVF. This is an optical finder with >> a rangefinder, so you're limited to Leica M-mount lenses for focusing. >> >> One of these with a Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limited would be pretty darn neat. >> :-) >> >> G >> — >> No matter where you go, there you are. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: The Future of Photography is Code
>En martes, 23 de octubre de 2018 16:12:45 CEST, Daniel J. Matyola > escribió: https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/Dan Matyolahttp://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola-- Very interesting and true. Thanks. I have a friend who has a smart phone review website and he shows me the phone camera outputs from time to time... All the relevant improvements are made by software. One of the last ones was a picture taken in low light that used multiple exposure in order to remove the blue cast of an object illuminated by an (almost only) blue light source. A sort of HDR for white balance. The result is amazing: https://www.teknofilo.com/analisis-pixel-3-xl/4 (in Spanish though) Regards, Jaume -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: The Future of Photography is Code
There's really only so much you can do with code, before you're no longer recording a scene, and are actually generating it, which is art not photography. Personally I prefer my art to be produced by humans not by machines mainly because machine art is kinda dull. On 10/23/2018 10:10 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/ Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: a new camera ...
One of these with a Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limited would be pretty darn neat. :-) So is a Leica pretty much any of them, or even a Epson RD1. I have a prediction, it doesn't have the name Leica on it, and it doesn't have a red dot, based on that I predict this camera will tank in the market, because it will require a Leica sized price and really no one really likes a range finder, (well I like rangefinders, but only in comparison to cameras that have scale focusing), if they have another choice, unless it has the name Leica on it, and there are lots of rangefinder like cameras with EVFs to choose from these days. I also predict this for the new Zenit M, because, the Zenit was an inexpensive camera that actually cost more to make than it sold for, because the Soviet Union really needed Hard western currency. At $5000-$7000 it just isn't worth that much for a Russian branded novelty. If it costs like a Leica, you might as well buy a Leica. On 10/23/2018 10:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Slightly off-topic for PDML, but I thought BobW, Cotty, and maybe a couple others might be interested. --- This is a new take on the "M-mount digital camera" that I saw on Leica Rumors: https://pixii.fr. Rangefinder, manual focus and exposure, no LCD, 256G built-in memory only, WiFi connect for data transfer, etc. They don't list a sensor format and Mpixel yet, but rumor has it that it's an APS-C format with 12 to 16 Mpixels. Another information update is supposedly due soon. Could be a pretty neat camera if it pans out and gets produced. Kind of an updated, modernized take on the Ricoh GXR with M-mount camera unit fitted—the best non-Leica M-mount camera there's been so far. Of course, that was an EVF camera which meant it was more versatile lens-wise but its lifespan was tied to the quality of the EVF. This is an optical finder with a rangefinder, so you're limited to Leica M-mount lenses for focusing. One of these with a Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limited would be pretty darn neat. :-) G — No matter where you go, there you are. -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: The Future of Photography is Code
https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/22/the-future-of-photography-is-code/ Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
a new camera ...
Slightly off-topic for PDML, but I thought BobW, Cotty, and maybe a couple others might be interested. --- This is a new take on the "M-mount digital camera" that I saw on Leica Rumors: https://pixii.fr. Rangefinder, manual focus and exposure, no LCD, 256G built-in memory only, WiFi connect for data transfer, etc. They don't list a sensor format and Mpixel yet, but rumor has it that it's an APS-C format with 12 to 16 Mpixels. Another information update is supposedly due soon. Could be a pretty neat camera if it pans out and gets produced. Kind of an updated, modernized take on the Ricoh GXR with M-mount camera unit fitted—the best non-Leica M-mount camera there's been so far. Of course, that was an EVF camera which meant it was more versatile lens-wise but its lifespan was tied to the quality of the EVF. This is an optical finder with a rangefinder, so you're limited to Leica M-mount lenses for focusing. One of these with a Pentax-L 43mm f/1.9 Limited would be pretty darn neat. :-) G — No matter where you go, there you are. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: November PUG countdown
Done Dave On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:44 AM Brian Walters wrote: > > > On 23 October 2018 at 03:04 David J Brooks wrote: > > > > > > Brian > > > > I sent a wrong photo can i just resend the correct one ?? > > > Yeah - just use the form to send a new one. > > > Cheers > Brian > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: brown shrike
yup easy fix - looks great ann On 10/23/2018 8:35 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote: On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:00:08 -0400 ann sanfedele wrote: geometry - Bird would go more to the right, less to the center , no? more OFF center... less centered - only a smidgen of stuff in top right corner. yes, what was i thinking? :) cropped out the offending part... but cloning it out woudl work as well all though a bit annoying to do :-) ann On 10/23/2018 6:58 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote: On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:29:58 -0400 ann sanfedele wrote: Subash -- didnt see your original post... I don't agree with Ken on the crop, but Iwould like to see that upper right hand foliage to go.. that would shift the bird a bit more off center too - I'm guessing you were just being a tad lazy- The expanse ofblurry background is a positive - minus my quibble - really nice work - as usual thank you Ann, and everyone who looked. i didn't crop the top right hand corner because, like you said, it would push the bird more to the centre but i guess i should do it... On 10/22/2018 4:47 PM, Ken Waller wrote: Good looking subject. If it were mine I'd crop it in a portrait mode excluding all outside the ULH and LRH portion of the branch, those portions excluded don't add anything to the image. -Original Message- From: Subash Jeyan http://something-feathered.in/2018/10/21/brown-shrike/ k5iis, sigma 150-500 os hsm, @500 mm, cropped. -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT - spotted on Google street view
LOL! No luck diguising these guys though... http://turl.no/2757 Jostein Den 22.10.2018 19:39, skrev John Francis: It's no good, Google - I can still recognise her ... https://www.google.com/maps/@40.6887541,-74.0437946,2a,37.5y,317.28h,121.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWCjUEJjYRdtjBsM8tei04Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en&authuser=0 (Just in case it doesn't look the same for you as it does for me, I see facial blurring) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: brown shrike
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:00:08 -0400 ann sanfedele wrote: > geometry - > Bird would go more to the right, less to the center , no? more OFF > center... less centered - > only a smidgen of stuff in top right corner. yes, what was i thinking? :) cropped out the offending part... > but cloning it out woudl work as well all though a bit annoying to > do :-) > > ann > > On 10/23/2018 6:58 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:29:58 -0400 > > ann sanfedele wrote: > > > >> Subash -- didnt see your original post... > >> I don't agree with Ken on the crop, but Iwould like to see that > >> upper right hand foliage to go.. that would shift the bird a bit > >> more off center too - I'm guessing you were just being a tad lazy- > >> The expanse ofblurry background is a positive - minus my quibble - > >> really nice work - as usual > > thank you Ann, and everyone who looked. > > > > i didn't crop the top right hand corner because, like you said, it > > would push the bird more to the centre but i guess i should do it... > > > >> On 10/22/2018 4:47 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > >>> Good looking subject. > >>> If it were mine I'd crop it in a portrait mode excluding all > >>> outside the ULH and LRH portion of the branch, those portions > >>> excluded don't add anything to the image. > >>> > >>> > >>> -Original Message- > From: Subash Jeyan Subject: PESO: brown shrike > > the brown shrike, a winter migrant from its breeding ranges in > central asia, china and japan: > > http://something-feathered.in/2018/10/21/brown-shrike/ > > k5iis, sigma 150-500 os hsm, @500 mm, cropped. > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: Observations about Software and art of visual communication
In many OSes with graphical interfaces/environment/launchers (Windows,
Android, MacOS, X11 in Unix and Unix-like systems),
the icons for the program often contain the first letter from the program
title.
E.g.:
S for Skype
Ps for Photoshop
Lr for Lightroom
W for Word
P for Powerpoint (as well as Publisher by MS)
O - for Opera
...
And then, the programs/apps are alphabetically ordered in Android
and Windows-10 launchers ("Start" button).
Last week, I spent some amount of time looking under "X" for Microsoft
Excel.
Cheers,
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Re: PESO: brown shrike
geometry - Bird would go more to the right, less to the center , no? more OFF center... less centered - only a smidgen of stuff in top right corner. but cloning it out woudl work as well all though a bit annoying to do :-) ann On 10/23/2018 6:58 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote: On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:29:58 -0400 ann sanfedele wrote: Subash -- didnt see your original post... I don't agree with Ken on the crop, but Iwould like to see that upper right hand foliage to go.. that would shift the bird a bit more off center too - I'm guessing you were just being a tad lazy- The expanse ofblurry background is a positive - minus my quibble - really nice work - as usual thank you Ann, and everyone who looked. i didn't crop the top right hand corner because, like you said, it would push the bird more to the centre but i guess i should do it... On 10/22/2018 4:47 PM, Ken Waller wrote: Good looking subject. If it were mine I'd crop it in a portrait mode excluding all outside the ULH and LRH portion of the branch, those portions excluded don't add anything to the image. -Original Message- From: Subash Jeyan http://something-feathered.in/2018/10/21/brown-shrike/ k5iis, sigma 150-500 os hsm, @500 mm, cropped. -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: brown shrike
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:29:58 -0400 ann sanfedele wrote: > Subash -- didnt see your original post... > I don't agree with Ken on the crop, but Iwould like to see that upper > right hand foliage to go.. that would shift the bird a bit more off > center too - I'm guessing you were just being a tad lazy- > The expanse ofblurry background is a positive - minus my quibble - > really nice work - as usual thank you Ann, and everyone who looked. i didn't crop the top right hand corner because, like you said, it would push the bird more to the centre but i guess i should do it... > On 10/22/2018 4:47 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > > Good looking subject. > > If it were mine I'd crop it in a portrait mode excluding all > > outside the ULH and LRH portion of the branch, those portions > > excluded don't add anything to the image. > > > > > > -Original Message- > >> From: Subash Jeyan >> Subject: PESO: brown shrike > >> > >> the brown shrike, a winter migrant from its breeding ranges in > >> central asia, china and japan: > >> > >> http://something-feathered.in/2018/10/21/brown-shrike/ > >> > >> k5iis, sigma 150-500 os hsm, @500 mm, cropped. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: brown shrike
Yes, Ann. That fairly bright vertical branch on the right needs at least partially removed on the right side and the balance shaded a bit. J Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 22, 2018, at 7:29 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > Subash -- didnt see your original post... > I don't agree with Ken on the crop, but Iwould like to see that upper right > hand foliage to go.. that would shift the bird a bit more off center too - > I'm guessing you were just being a tad lazy- > The expanse ofblurry background is a positive - minus my quibble - really > nice work - as usual > > ann > >> On 10/22/2018 4:47 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >> Good looking subject. >> If it were mine I'd crop it in a portrait mode excluding all outside the ULH >> and LRH portion of the branch, those portions excluded don't add anything to >> the image. >> >> >> -Original Message- >>> From: Subash Jeyan >> Subject: PESO: brown shrike >>> >>> the brown shrike, a winter migrant from its breeding ranges in central >>> asia, china and japan: >>> >>> http://something-feathered.in/2018/10/21/brown-shrike/ >>> >>> k5iis, sigma 150-500 os hsm, @500 mm, cropped. >>> >>> comments appreciated. >>> >>> subash >> > > -- > ann sanfedele photography > https://annsan.smugmug.com > https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff > https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: November PUG countdown
> On 23 October 2018 at 03:04 David J Brooks wrote: > > > Brian > > I sent a wrong photo can i just resend the correct one ?? Yeah - just use the form to send a new one. Cheers Brian > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
