Re: [HACKERS] compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel is broken
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ...it seems that the connection timeout can only be specified to the nearest > second. Given that, is there any reason not to use time() instead of > gettimeofday()? As the code stands it's pretty necessary. Since we'll go around the loop multiple times, in much less than a second per loop in most cases, the timeout resolution will be really poor if we only measure each iteration to the nearest second. > It looks like there is a great deal of complexity added to the function just > to accommodate the fact that gettimeofday returns seconds and microseconds as > distinct members of the result struct. It is ugly coding; if you can think of a better way, go for it. It might work to measure time since the start of the whole process, or until the timeout target, rather than accumulating adjustments to the "remains" count each time through. In other words something like at start: targettime = time() + specified-timeout each time we are about to wait: set select timeout to targettime - time(). This bounds the error at 1 second which is probably good enough (you might want to add 1 to targettime to ensure the error is in the conservative direction of not timing out too soon). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
[HACKERS] compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel is broken
I'm trying to get the client utilities to compile under win32/VS.net per http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/install-win32.html. I was able to do this successfully using the 7.2.2 tarball, but using current 7.3devel there are a number of minor issues (missing defines, adjustments to includes), and one more difficult item (at least so far). The latter is the use of gettimeofday in fe-connect.c:connectDBComplete for which there does not seem to be a good alternate under win32. In connectDBComplete I see: /* * Prepare to time calculations, if connect_timeout isn't zero. */ if (conn->connect_timeout != NULL) { remains.tv_sec = atoi(conn->connect_timeout); so it seems that the connection timeout can only be specified to the nearest second. Given that, is there any reason not to use time() instead of gettimeofday()? It looks like there is a great deal of complexity added to the function just to accommodate the fact that gettimeofday returns seconds and microseconds as distinct members of the result struct. I think switching this code to use time() would both simplify it, and make it win32 compatible. Comments? Joe ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly