RE: [pinhole-discussion] [pinhole discussion] New Lith Print

2002-07-02 Thread Andy Schmitt
I second the motion..Great!
andy

-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Andrew
Amundsen
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:21 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] [pinhole discussion] New Lith Print


From: Christian Harkness chris.harkn...@eudoramail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I just uploaded a new pinhole lith print.  It's from a 35 mm negative done
 with a pinhole body cap.


http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=chri
sharkness
 .jpg

 chris


Chris, very nice shot. What kind of exposure/shutter speed are you
getting using a pinhole bodycap. Film speed and lighting conditions were
what this day?

Andrew

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/




Re: [pinhole-discussion] [pinhole discussion] New Lith Print

2002-07-02 Thread B2MYOUNG
This as an absolutely beautiful photograph.
It matters not how it was done...pinhole, body cap, lens, printing 
method...nothing!

THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS HERE IS THE IMAGE,

AND IT'S WONDERFUL! 

Thank you for sharing it with us.
leezy



[pinhole-discussion] Opinions on new cover art

2002-07-02 Thread David Pyndus
All:
Don't know if any of you pinholers are music fans as well, but I was looking
at the cover art for the new Bruce Springsteen album The Rising and it
sure looks like a pinhole photo to me.  Am wondering if my imagination is
working overtime, or is this appears to be a pinhole to others as well?

The album art can be seen at Springsteen's web site, at:
www.brucespringsteen.net

Any comments would be welcome, thanks, David




Re: [pinhole-discussion] [pinhole discussion] New Lith Print

2002-07-02 Thread gregg b. mc neill
I just uploaded a new pinhole lith print.  It's from a 35 mm negative done 
with a pinhole body cap.


http://www.???/discussion/upload/gallery2002.php?pic=chrisharkness.jpg

chris



That is a Gorgeous print!  I have been tring to achieve that etheric quality 
in my work for some time.

Is it the Lith process that does it?  It's just wonderful.

gregg

_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com





Re: [pinhole-discussion] Giant pinhole contact print

2002-07-02 Thread Gordon J. Holtslander
Hi:

If its any help I looked up the largest size of the ortho film I use.
(Kpgraphics Kodak Camera 2000 CGP film)

Its a 52 inch by 200 foot roll.

See

http://www.kpgraphics.com/pdf/info/FilmAndPaperProducts.pdf

If this was used, I wonder if you could skip the initial pre-wash, and
make a giant vaccuum frame for to get good contact for the contact print.
I've heard of people making a vaccuum frame with sheets of clear mylar,
instead of glass on a wooden base.  But that goes against the rule of
thumb of keeping things as simple as possible ;)

I'm astounded at the effort you've put into this.

Once you figure out all the details we'll have to get a number of room
size pinhole cameras shots on pinhole day all over the world next year and
then make an international travelling exhibition with them :)  Nothing
like thinking big.

Gord

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Guy Glorieux wrote:

 Hi friends,

 It's was exactly two months ago this weekend that we shot our giant
 pinhole photograph from the 10th floor of the Wyndham hotel in Montreal
 and after considerable struggle, we've finally created a contact
 positive from the paper negative.

 Of the 3 prints we made during the weekend, one is successful and one is
 OK.  The last has really weird streaks which would normally be
 unacceptable but turns it into a rather surreal print.  I will be
 shooting pictures of the prints tomorrow and hope to be able to post the
 images on the web soon after.

 This whole project was incredible hard work and I understand why those
 who do giant paper negatives do not make contact positives.  It requires
 a big team (there were seven of us and that was not too much),  a
 detailed script of each and every task to be done, by whom and when as
 well as a tremendous amount of coordination between the team members.

 It also requires huge facilities.  The printing and processing was done
 in a light tight 20'x30' studio with a 12' ceiling and this was cramped.
 We needed an additional light tight room with a large 3'x6' sink to
 pre-wash the unexposed paper before making the contact print and to wash
 the prints after processing.  And then we needed a clean room to hang
 dry the 12.5' x 8' prints and the paper negative after they were washed.

 I won't talk about costs, but all in all, we've used 1 1/4 roll of 50''
 x 98' of Ilford paper for the negative and the contact prints; close to
 100 sheets of 16x20 paper, 50 sheets of 11x14 paper and about 250 sheets
 of 8x10 paper for the exposure tests; and finally over 300 litres of
 developer and 300 litres of fix for the processing.

 We plan to take a break this summer from giant pinholin' but we're doing
 location search for more images.

 Talk to you soon,

 Guy




 ___
 Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
 Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
 Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
 unsubscribe or change your account at
 http://www.???/discussion/


-
Gordon J. Holtslander   Dept. of Biology
hol...@duke.usask.ca112 Science Place
http://duke.usask.ca/~holtsgUniversity of Saskatchewan
Tel (306) 966-4433  Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Fax (306) 966-4461  Canada  S7N 5E2
-