Bug#745897: fixed in libstruts1.2-java 1.2.9-9
2014-06-15 15:35 GMT+09:00 Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp: This pattern will match to words other than class, eg. fooClass. Any class should be accepted, maybe it'd cause some trouble but non-class should not named as *class, IMHO. That might be the case. This issue might be a very small problem. Actually, Red Hat users do not seem to be troubled. But I think users should be informed of it (in DSA, README.Debian or somewhere). Regards, Nobuhiro __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of libjopendocument-java_1.3repack-1_amd64.changes
libjopendocument-java_1.3repack-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjopendocument-java_1.3repack-1_all.deb libjopendocument-java_1.3repack-1.dsc libjopendocument-java_1.3repack.orig.tar.gz libjopendocument-java_1.3repack-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
libjopendocument-java_1.3repack-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:libjopendocument-java is NEW. source:libjopendocument-java is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Severity is still serious [was source of jquery is missing]
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #735227 [activemq] [activemq] Non sourced jquery Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor' -- 735227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#735227: Severity is still serious [was source of jquery is missing]
control: severity -1 serious X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org activemq-web-demo/src/main/webapp/js/jquery-1.4.2.min.js lack source., env if you do not use it. According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2: The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in source code as well as compiled form.. This could also constitute a license violation for some copyleft licenses such as the GNU GPL. In order to solve this problem, you could: 1. repack the origin tarball adding the missing source to it. 2 add the source files to debian/missing-sources directory Both way satisfies the requirement that we ship the source. Second option might be preferable due to the following reasons [2]: - Upstream can do it too and you could even supply a patch to them, thus full filling our social contract [3], see particularly ยง2. - If source and non-source are in different locations, ftpmasters may miss the source and (needlessly) reject the package. - The source isn't duplicated in every .diff.gz/.debian.tar.* (though this only really matters for larger sources). You could also ask debian...@lists.debian.org or #debian-qa for more guidance. Bastien __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
activemq is marked for autoremoval from testing
activemq 5.6.0+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-07-21 It is affected by these RC bugs: 735227: activemq: [activemq] Non sourced jquery __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
uima-as is marked for autoremoval from testing
uima-as 2.3.1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-07-21 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 735227: activemq: [activemq] Non sourced jquery __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
