Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
On 2012-08-01 10:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some discussion (there are changes which don't appear to be mentioned in the changelog and some of the changes listed in the changelog don't actually appear tohave been made). So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this separately? - Fabian There is a bug for it, #683247, tagged moreinfo. ~Niels ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [Lmuse-user] [ANN] MusE 2.0.1 released
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Fabrice Coutadeur coutade...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Any help needed for this update? Alessio seems to be the only active member of the git repo, and I could help. Cool, please do! Also, where is it possible to see the 2 'official' maintainers of a package? Actually, I really think that *each* package within pkg-multimedia should have *at least* two people working on it. Otherwise, I see little point spending team ressources such as mailing list for git commit notifications and bug reports on it. So, yes, if you have time, please clone the repository and start hacking on it! IS there any wiki page? http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ Thanks, Fabrice -- regards, Reinhard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some discussion (there are changes which don't appear to be mentioned in the changelog and some of the changes listed in the changelog don't actually appear tohave been made). So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this separately? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some discussion (there are changes which don't appear to be mentioned in the changelog and some of the changes listed in the changelog don't actually appear tohave been made). So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this separately? The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard said he was going to upload -6. That bug also contains some discussion which suggests the previous m-a:foreign changes were incorrect. In any case, let's move the discussion there, please. :-) Regards, Adam ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#683465: marked as done (yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path)
Your message dated Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:44:57 +0200 with message-id 20120801144457.GA6118@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#683465: yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path has caused the Debian Bug report #683465, regarding yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 683465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683465 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: yafaray Version: 0.1.2+really0.1.2~beta5-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I'm attempting to use yafaray from the commandline (yafaray-xml). Also saw the problem below with the wheezy version, but updated to the experimental version just to check whether that fixed it. The test file below yafarayRender.xml is linked from http://www.yafaray.org/community/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13t=3204 unzipped to /tmp but I don't think its content affects anything below. First attempt: $ yafaray-xml /tmp/yafarayRender/yafarayRender.xml INFO: YafaRay (None) INFO: The plugin path is: /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray INFO: Environment: Loading plugins ... ERROR: Environment: There is no image handlers registrered ERROR: Couldn't find any valid image format, image handlers missing? OK... well /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray doesn't exist, but the package seems to provide a bunch of stuff in /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins and the man page describes a -p option which sets the path. So try: $ yafaray-xml -p /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins /tmp/yafarayRender/yafarayRender.xml INFO: YafaRay (None) INFO: The plugin path is: /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray INFO: Environment: Loading plugins ... ERROR: Environment: There is no image handlers registrered ERROR: Couldn't find any valid image format, image handlers missing? or $ yafaray-xml -p /usr/lib/yafaray /tmp/yafarayRender/yafarayRender.xml INFO: YafaRay (None) INFO: The plugin path is: /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray INFO: Environment: Loading plugins ... ERROR: Environment: There is no image handlers registrered ERROR: Couldn't find any valid image format, image handlers missing? but no joy either way. Since the /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins directory does contain a bunch of .so libs with jpeg/png/ppm/tga in the name, I'm guessing there are suitable image handlers there, if only the default path was right or could be set. Haven't tried using yafaray from blender at all. Thanks for any attention this gets. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages yafaray depends on: ii libc6 2.13-33 ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.1-2 ii libilmbase6 1.0.1-4 ii libjpeg8 8d-1 ii libopenexr6 1.6.1-6 ii libpng15-15 1.5.11-1 ii libpython3.2 3.2.3-2 ii libstdc++64.7.1-2 ii libtiff4 3.9.6-6 ii libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-4 ii python3 3.2.3-4 ii zlib1g1:1.2.7.dfsg-13 Versions of packages yafaray recommends: ii blender 2.63a-1 yafaray suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package: yafaray Version: 0.1.2+really0.1.2~beta5-3 Hi! On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:31:20AM +0100, Local user wrote: OK... well /usr/lib/yafaray/yafaray doesn't exist, but the package seems to provide a bunch of stuff in /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins and the man page describes a -p option which sets the path. Wrong. The correct parameter to use is -pp and: $ yafaray-xml -pp /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins path-to-file/yafarayRender.xml works fine here. So, closing. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A---End Message--- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#662628: Reported upstream
severity 660700 grave tags 660700 - upstream + fixed-upstream merge 662628 660700 thanks Am Montag, den 30.07.2012, 19:23 +0200 schrieb gregor herrmann: The upstream trac instance claims that the bug is fixed since yesterday including a commit (actually a revert): http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-2.0.git;a=commit;h=e89f4296febf218a5669a8ceb09ee79d9def0f25 Yes, this bug is fixed in the upstream branch. I will wait for the 2.0.4 bug-fix release to fix this RC bug. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#662628: Reported upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 660700 grave Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at startup when activated Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' tags 660700 - upstream + fixed-upstream Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at startup when activated Removed tag(s) upstream. Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at startup when activated Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. merge 662628 660700 Bug #662628 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc: Serious problems with playing video files Unable to merge bugs because: forwarded of #660700 is 'http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641' not 'https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641' Failed to merge 662628: Did not alter merged bugs Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x1ae0210)', 'requester', 'Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org', 'request_addr', 'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid', '1343840243.29962.5.camel@deep-thought', 'request_subject', ...) called at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 537 eval {...} called at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 536 Debbugs::Control::Service::control_line('line', 'merge 662628 660700', 'clonebugs', 'HASH(0x1ad99e8)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x1ad9430)', 'common_control_options', 'ARRAY(0x1ad9478)', 'errors', ...) called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 471 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 660700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660700 662628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662628 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: merge the bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 660700 https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641 Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at startup when activated Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641' from 'http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/6641' merge 662628 660700 Bug #662628 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc: Serious problems with playing video files Bug #660700 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc-plugin-notify: application blocks at startup when activated Marked as found in versions vlc/2.0.0-6. Bug #662628 [vlc-plugin-notify] vlc: Serious problems with playing video files Marked as found in versions vlc/2.0.0-1. Merged 660700 662628 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 660700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660700 662628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662628 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
01.08.2012 в 09:45:12 +0100 Adam D. Barratt написал: On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this separately? The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard said he was going to upload -6. That bug also contains some discussion which suggests the previous m-a:foreign changes were incorrect. In any case, let's move the discussion there, please. :-) These multi-arch changes were correct (the packages cannot be Multi-Arch: foreign because they provide architecture-specific interface) but not ideal (architecture-specific packages should not be Architecture: all). And problems created by this non-ideality are mitigated by general uselessness of the packages (they are intented to transition packages which were never in stable). Also, multi-arch changes were described correctly in the changelog before http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=commitdiff;h=677532340a55be1e0974de241f06aa605e2be083 The architecture change of libav-extra-dbg (with libav-regular-dbg forgotten again) was in fact related to #680602, not #680613. And it also creates architecture-dependent Architecture: all package problems. Which are again mitigated by uselessness of the package (it is not only intended to transition from package not found in stable, but also does not have reverse dependencies). ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#683465: yafaray: Can't set yafaray plugins path
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 16:44 +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: The correct parameter to use is -pp and: $ yafaray-xml -pp /usr/lib/yafaray/plugins path-to-file/yafarayRender.xml works fine here. So, closing. Ah, thanks! In that case the real problem is with the man page which says -p path Set an alternative path for the plugins. I (now) note that running the binary with no options does list -pp in the resulting help text. But it also lists a bunch of other/different options which lead me to believe the yafaray-xml.1 man page provided in the package is now rather obsolete/misleading... seems to be one of those created-for-Debian ones cooked up in the absence of one being provided by upstream. Update, or reduce it down to simply refer to another source of documentation ? (Better to contain no information than false information IMHO). Anyway, I'll leave it at that... thanks again Tim ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
guten Tag
Hallo dies ist ein Elektronik-Unternehmen das Unternehmen verkaufen haupts?chlich iPhone, iPad, Kamera, Rolex-Uhr, MacBook . der Preis ist sehr niedriger W e b; mndlrrr.com ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers