Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kernel-vanilla.spec - fix for PPC failing when ...
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:58:49AM +0200, hawk wrote: +# build fix for intel network drivers for PPC +Patch0: linux-2.6-ppc-ICE-hacks.patch It's not vanilla now ;P -- Jakub Boguszhttp://qboosh.pl/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
[th] qt4 problems
Hi, 1. closing any qt4 application (e.g. kpoldek) crashes entire X server, 2. qt4 doesn't honour fontocnfig setup (doesn't draw through freetype/cairo/Xft and I've got badly subpixeled fonts) - is it fourth rendering engine? -- Tom Pala [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/ http://tccs.sourceforge.net/ ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kernel-vanilla.spec - fix for PPC failing when ...
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Marcin Król wrote: But it's not vanila now :D How about replacing with sed instead of using patch? :) sed was used on makefiles anyway (for extraversion). vanilla means unmodified. And you are changing that kernel. Doesn't matter if it's cosmetics or not. No matter if it's patch or sed. It's just mine 0,03€ about kernel-vanilla in general :D -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kernel-vanilla.spec - fix for PPC failing when ...
vanilla means unmodified. And you are changing that kernel. Doesn't matter if it's cosmetics or not. No matter if it's patch or sed. Yes. I know all that. By my previous mail I was trying to say: then it was never vanilla kernel as sed was used to modify makefile since the first revision. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
Re: [PLD 3.x (Th): Bug 23] binutils segfault
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:22:01PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Argh, resending. Could sb fix Reply-To address from pld-bugs list? (missing lists. in domain part) fixed. ;-) -- Michał Abramowicz abram pld - linux org ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
