Re: [NEW] python-openid-2.0.1
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:24:14PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > quick update for version 2.1.1. Did you have any news from twill > maintener ? Yes; the copyright headers on the .py files are wrong -- MIT is the intended license. Titus plans to release a new version without the confusing license info soon. When that comes out (soon?), I'll update my twill port. -- o--{ Will Maier }--o | web:...http://www.lfod.us/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | *--[ BSD Unix: Live Free or Die ]--*
Re: [NEW] python-openid-2.0.1
On Dec 17, 2007 9:17 PM, Will Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tweaked the port a bit and made it available here: > > http://www.lfod.us/files/ports/py-openid.tgz > > In addition to tabbing fixes, I rewrote pkg/DESCR to be less verbose > and added www/twill to REGRESS_DEPENDS. Without twill (which doesn't > exist in the tree, yet), the regress test seems pretty incomplete. > > My next mail will include a twill port... > quick update for version 2.1.1. Did you have any news from twill maintener ? - benoit py-openid.tgz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: [bug] mercurial 0.9.5
On Dec 27, 2007 5:19 PM, Will Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > little bug in current mercurial package. hgk extension use wish > > (installed with tk) but wish8.4 is installed on openbsd. Here is a > > little patch to fix it. > > I like the intent of this patch, but I've considered and decided > against similar things in the past. A patch like this would provide > only a little benefit (since users already have to install tk and > move ${PREFIX}/share/mercurial/hgk into their $PATH anyway) while > increasing the likelihood of bitrot in devel/mercurial. > > As things stand, the port installs several files under ${PREFIX}/share > that may require some fiddling before they'll work. I think this is > a reasonable compromise between providing extra functionality (like > zsh_completion or mercurial.el) without making the mercurial package > a PITA to install. > > That said, I'm still open to other opinions on this, though. > Well you don't need to move any file to use hgk. Customizing ~/.hgrc like this : -- [extensions] hgk=/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hgext/hgk.py [hgk] path=/usr/local/share/mercurial/hgk is enough. But think you're right, this is really little benefit. I hesitated before sending the patch. - benoît
Re: [bug] mercurial 0.9.5
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > little bug in current mercurial package. hgk extension use wish > (installed with tk) but wish8.4 is installed on openbsd. Here is a > little patch to fix it. I like the intent of this patch, but I've considered and decided against similar things in the past. A patch like this would provide only a little benefit (since users already have to install tk and move ${PREFIX}/share/mercurial/hgk into their $PATH anyway) while increasing the likelihood of bitrot in devel/mercurial. As things stand, the port installs several files under ${PREFIX}/share that may require some fiddling before they'll work. I think this is a reasonable compromise between providing extra functionality (like zsh_completion or mercurial.el) without making the mercurial package a PITA to install. That said, I'm still open to other opinions on this, though. -- o--{ Will Maier }--o | web:...http://www.lfod.us/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | *--[ BSD Unix: Live Free or Die ]--*
[bug] mercurial 0.9.5
little bug in current mercurial package. hgk extension use wish (installed with tk) but wish8.4 is installed on openbsd. Here is a little patch to fix it. - benoît -- http://friendpaste.com mercurial.diff Description: Binary data
Re: bsnmpd porting
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:19:50AM +0200, Bojidara Marinchovska wrote: > Would you ever porting bsnmpd ( http://people.freebsd.org/~harti/bsnmp/ ) > and it's modules ( bsnmp-regex , bsnmp-ping ) for OpenBSD stable or current > release ( i386 arch ) ? > > Bsnmpd with bsnmp-ping module is so wonderful pingator ... > excellent-working, so light ... ! The only reason that _only one_ of my > routers is with OpenBSD is because in OpenBSD there is no bsnmpd ... All > manner of scripts as pingators is so awful ... slowly, lazy, heavy, > showing wrong data and so on ... > > http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/unix/b/bsnmpd.html - Here is written that > bsnmpd runs on OpenBSD 3.2 i386 arch ... That page specifically lists systems that bsnmpd is NOT available for. > # uname -a > OpenBSD r1 4.2 GENERIC#8 i386 > > From OpenBSD 3.6 i386 to now i'm still trying to install bsnmpd on my box > ... > > Soon , i'll try to install bsnmpd on OpenBSD 3.2 i386 ... > > Best regards Also it's probably not the best time to be asking for something like that, seeing our own implementation of snmpd was imported into the tree... But then again if you would provide a port for it, someone could like it enough. -- viq
UPDATE: net/poptop
Poptop updated to latest stable version, maintainership change discussed some times ago (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=116648382708437&w=2) Tested @i386 Giovanni Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/poptop/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.5 Makefile --- Makefile16 Dec 2004 00:31:24 - 1.5 +++ Makefile27 Dec 2007 14:57:07 - @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.5 2004/12/16 00:31:24 alek Exp $ -COMMENT= "PPTP Server" +COMMENT= PPTP Server -PKGNAME= poptop-1.1.4.b4p1 -DISTNAME= pptpd-1.1.4-b4 +PKGNAME= poptop-1.3.0 +DISTNAME= pptpd-1.3.0 CATEGORIES=net HOMEPAGE= http://www.poptop.org/ -MAINTAINER=Craig Barraclough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +MAINTAINER=Giovanni Bechis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # GPL PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@ MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE CONFIGURE_STYLE= gnu CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-bsdppp --with-pppd-ip-alloc +USE_GMAKE= yes -WRKDIST= ${WRKDIR}/poptop-1.1.4 +post-patch: + @perl -pi -e 's,/usr,${PREFIX},g' ${WRKSRC}/pptpctrl.c post-install: ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/examples/poptop Index: distinfo === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/poptop/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.3 distinfo --- distinfo5 Jan 2005 17:14:57 - 1.3 +++ distinfo27 Dec 2007 14:57:07 - @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ -MD5 (pptpd-1.1.4-b4.tar.gz) = 58603224998f22542e8d7ecb357bc006 -RMD160 (pptpd-1.1.4-b4.tar.gz) = 4824a2cdb7bd5ba7d4891ba02126700d996731ca -SHA1 (pptpd-1.1.4-b4.tar.gz) = 0d81d9cd9be498dd442a182c33deafbe694038cd -SIZE (pptpd-1.1.4-b4.tar.gz) = 157684 +MD5 (pptpd-1.3.0.tar.gz) = ddSU6IH3An9OYLEUFj9rZw== +RMD160 (pptpd-1.3.0.tar.gz) = AbuXa1ZYnX/SZGU8OUq+PIg+BVs= +SHA1 (pptpd-1.3.0.tar.gz) = mqEjRq+mB2UfFuHdffA1bXF7Y68= +SHA256 (pptpd-1.3.0.tar.gz) = T2/k6wjKemnINlirE7I6d6oVPsGiZjWW3cu/NXaLDO4= +SIZE (pptpd-1.3.0.tar.gz) = 204099 Index: patches/patch-Makefile_in === RCS file: patches/patch-Makefile_in diff -N patches/patch-Makefile_in --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 - +++ patches/patch-Makefile_in 27 Dec 2007 14:57:07 - @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +$OpenBSD$ +--- Makefile.in.orig Wed Aug 3 09:47:42 2005 Makefile.inSun Mar 18 12:19:38 2007 +@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ NORMAL_UNINSTALL = : + PRE_UNINSTALL = : + POST_UNINSTALL = : + EXTRA_PROGRAMS = +-sbin_PROGRAMS = pptpd$(EXEEXT) pptpctrl$(EXEEXT) bcrelay$(EXEEXT) ++sbin_PROGRAMS = pptpd$(EXEEXT) pptpctrl$(EXEEXT) + subdir = . + DIST_COMMON = README $(am__configure_deps) $(srcdir)/Makefile.am \ + $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(srcdir)/config.h.in \ +@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ COMPILE = $(CC) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUD + $(CPPFLAGS) $(AM_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) + CCLD = $(CC) + LINK = $(CCLD) $(AM_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(AM_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ +-SOURCES = $(bcrelay_SOURCES) $(pptpctrl_SOURCES) $(pptpd_SOURCES) +-DIST_SOURCES = $(bcrelay_SOURCES) $(pptpctrl_SOURCES) $(pptpd_SOURCES) ++SOURCES = $(pptpctrl_SOURCES) $(pptpd_SOURCES) ++DIST_SOURCES = $(pptpctrl_SOURCES) $(pptpd_SOURCES) + man5dir = $(mandir)/man5 + man8dir = $(mandir)/man8 + NROFF = nroff Index: patches/patch-pptpctrl_c === RCS file: patches/patch-pptpctrl_c diff -N patches/patch-pptpctrl_c --- patches/patch-pptpctrl_c17 Apr 2003 08:59:26 - 1.1.1.1 +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 - @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -$OpenBSD: patch-pptpctrl_c,v 1.1.1.1 2003/04/17 08:59:26 wilfried Exp $ pptpctrl.c.origFri Apr 11 10:51:32 2003 -+++ pptpctrl.c Fri Apr 11 10:51:53 2003 -@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ - #include - #include - #include --#include - #include - #include - #include Index: pkg/PFRAG.shared === RCS file: pkg/PFRAG.shared diff -N pkg/PFRAG.shared --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 - +++ pkg/PFRAG.shared27 Dec 2007 14:57:07 - @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] $OpenBSD$ +lib/pptpd/pptpd-logwtmp.so Index: pkg/PLIST === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/poptop/pkg/PLIST,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.6 PLIST --- pkg/PLIST 11 Nov 2004 18:15:53 - 1.6 +++ pkg/PLIST 27 Dec 2007 14:57:07 - @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.6 2004/11/11 18:15:53 naddy Exp $ +%%SHARED%% +lib/pptpd/ @man man/man5/pptpd.conf.5 @man man/man8/pptpctrl.8 @man man/man8/pptpd.8 @@ -9,5 +11,4 @@ share/doc/poptop/README.OpenBSD share/examples/poptop/ share/examples/poptop/pptpd.conf-sample @sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/pptpd.conf [EMAIL PROTECTED] GRE support required for PPTP data @sysctl net.inet
bsnmpd porting
Would you ever porting bsnmpd ( http://people.freebsd.org/~harti/bsnmp/ ) and it's modules ( bsnmp-regex , bsnmp-ping ) for OpenBSD stable or current release ( i386 arch ) ? Bsnmpd with bsnmp-ping module is so wonderful pingator ... excellent-working, so light ... ! The only reason that _only one_ of my routers is with OpenBSD is because in OpenBSD there is no bsnmpd ... All manner of scripts as pingators is so awful ... slowly, lazy, heavy, showing wrong data and so on ... http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/unix/b/bsnmpd.html - Here is written that bsnmpd runs on OpenBSD 3.2 i386 arch ... # uname -a OpenBSD r1 4.2 GENERIC#8 i386 From OpenBSD 3.6 i386 to now i'm still trying to install bsnmpd on my box ... Soon , i'll try to install bsnmpd on OpenBSD 3.2 i386 ... Best regards