Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 02:46:07PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > I've been using this for various LaTeX work on both i386 and amd64 for > a while now. No visible issue. Great. I think I will commit this soon. Thanks. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:00:29AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:16:41AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Using the patch provided by sthen, it doesn't build for me on amd64: > > > > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.2 - texlive-base builds on -current now > > (following the changes to make to preserve whitespace). > > Ah, I was about to post a simialr diff. > > Yeh, we figured out that the recent make changes hosed my comments. > > When testing, can people please test the upgrade too. Works for me (tm), > but i would like to be sure that I did not miss anything. > I've been using this for various LaTeX work on both i386 and amd64 for a while now. No visible issue. ok matthieu@ -- Matthieu Herrb
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
Hi, On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 08:45:36PM -0500, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Dear Edd and Stuart, > > Sorry I could not join the party earlier. I started testing TeXLive 2012 > i386 on current. The diff > > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.2 > > Stuart posted works great. TeXLive builds and runs fine. I tested many > complex documents. Some highlights of my early testing: > > 1. Semantic checkers chktex and lacheck work as expected > 2. PSTrics (heavy user here) works as expected. My usual workflow > tex->dvi->ps->pdf works without a glitch. > 3. bibtex, natbib works great have not checked biblatex will check. > 4. RevTeX4.1 class which I used to install manually works as expected. > 5. ModernCV, modern letter, exams class works as expected. > 6. I tested flyers, posters, badges, powerdot all sorts of very > complicated documents (floats, hyperref, index anything you can think > of). > 7. Have not checked latexmk (I usually use home brewed Makefiles) on my > todo list. > 8. I have not tested MetaPost on my todo list (I do not use it). I am > also planning to play with Metafont. > 9. Asymptote not tested. > 10. pdfjam tested. > 11. tex4ht and htlatex tested. > 12. LuaTeX not tested, ConTeXT not tested. I will play in next couple of > weeks. I have tested conTeXt. > 13. XeTeX not tested! > 14. detex tested. This is great testing Predrag. Thanks for taking the time to look at this. > > The most important for the last. I could not find tlgmr. I am working > under the assumption that you removed tlgmr from the build > intensionally? However I see lots of tl related binaries: > > intltool-extractintltool-update > intltool-merge intltoolize > installfont-tl intltool-prepare tlmgr is removed on purpose. If I allowed you to run that, then file checksums would be changed and the packages would fail to remove cleanly. Also, we don't want a moving target. > IMHO TeXLive2012 works good enough to be imported into the current tree. > That would hopefully attract some more testers. I hope to import it before xmas. I think we are waiting on Todd (in CC) to get back to us. If all goes well there, then we just need some OKs. > P.S. Do you want me to test on amd64 and sparc64? I have tested on these two arches. > I usually stay with > i386 because of Opera. A report that it works on i386 is good news. > Any reports on loongson and sgi? I do not have > the hardware. Nor do I. And if you did, you would probably not have the patience to wait for the build :P But seriously, if the build is broken on these arches, then I think we could fix these based upon bulk build logs. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
Dear Edd and Stuart, Sorry I could not join the party earlier. I started testing TeXLive 2012 i386 on current. The diff http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.2 Stuart posted works great. TeXLive builds and runs fine. I tested many complex documents. Some highlights of my early testing: 1. Semantic checkers chktex and lacheck work as expected 2. PSTrics (heavy user here) works as expected. My usual workflow tex->dvi->ps->pdf works without a glitch. 3. bibtex, natbib works great have not checked biblatex will check. 4. RevTeX4.1 class which I used to install manually works as expected. 5. ModernCV, modern letter, exams class works as expected. 6. I tested flyers, posters, badges, powerdot all sorts of very complicated documents (floats, hyperref, index anything you can think of). 7. Have not checked latexmk (I usually use home brewed Makefiles) on my todo list. 8. I have not tested MetaPost on my todo list (I do not use it). I am also planning to play with Metafont. 9. Asymptote not tested. 10. pdfjam tested. 11. tex4ht and htlatex tested. 12. LuaTeX not tested, ConTeXT not tested. I will play in next couple of weeks. 13. XeTeX not tested! 14. detex tested. The most important for the last. I could not find tlgmr. I am working under the assumption that you removed tlgmr from the build intensionally? However I see lots of tl related binaries: intltool-extractintltool-update intltool-merge intltoolize installfont-tl intltool-prepare That is the first thing I am going to hit next couple of days. I probably left out tons of other stuff too but this is all I could do in one day. IMHO TeXLive2012 works good enough to be imported into the current tree. That would hopefully attract some more testers. Thank you so much for your hard work. Best, Predrag P.S. Do you want me to test on amd64 and sparc64? I usually stay with i386 because of Opera. Any reports on loongson and sgi? I do not have the hardware.
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:16:41AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Using the patch provided by sthen, it doesn't build for me on amd64: > > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.2 - texlive-base builds on -current now > (following the changes to make to preserve whitespace). Ah, I was about to post a simialr diff. Yeh, we figured out that the recent make changes hosed my comments. When testing, can people please test the upgrade too. Works for me (tm), but i would like to be sure that I did not miss anything. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On 2012/11/15 11:40, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:36:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would > > appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building > > some documents on their systems. > > > > The extent of my testing so far: > > > > - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. > > - Upgrade path works and is clean. > > - Plain latex works. > > - pdftex based compilers work. > > - texdoc works. > > - xindy works. > > - ConTeXt works. > > > > The updated port is here: > > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive > > > > Using the patch provided by sthen, it doesn't build for me on amd64: http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.2 - texlive-base builds on -current now (following the changes to make to preserve whitespace).
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:36:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would > appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building > some documents on their systems. > > The extent of my testing so far: > > - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. > - Upgrade path works and is clean. > - Plain latex works. > - pdftex based compilers work. > - texdoc works. > - xindy works. > - ConTeXt works. > > The updated port is here: > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive > Using the patch provided by sthen, it doesn't build for me on amd64: ===> Checking files for texlive_base-2012 `/share/OpenBSD/ports/distfiles/texlive-20120701-source.tar.xz' is up to date. `/share/OpenBSD/ports/distfiles/texlive-20120701-extra.tar.xz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) texlive-20120701-source.tar.xz: OK >> (SHA256) texlive-20120701-extra.tar.xz: OK ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: clisp-* -> clisp-2.48p3 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: intltool->=0.41.1p0 -> intltool-0.50.2 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: gmake-* -> gmake-3.82p2 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: xz-* -> xz-5.0.4 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: t1lib-* -> t1lib-5.1.2 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: png-* -> png-1.5.10p0 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: gd-* -> gd-2.0.35p1 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: freetype-* -> freetype-1.3.1p3 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: poppler-* -> poppler-0.20.5p0 ===> texlive_base-2012 depends on: libiconv-* -> libiconv-1.14 ===> Verifying specs: ICE SM X11 Xau Xaw Xdmcp Xext Xmu Xpm Xt c expat fontconfig freetype gd jpeg lcms2 m openjpeg png>=3 poppler pthread pthread-stubs stdc++ t1>=4 tiff ttf xcb z iconv>=2 ICE SM X11 Xau Xaw Xdmcp Xext Xmu Xpm Xt c expat fontconfig freetype gd jpeg lcms2 m openjpeg png>=3 poppler pthread pthread-stubs stdc++ t1>=4 tiff ttf xcb z iconv>=2 ===> found ICE.9.0 SM.8.0 X11.15.1 Xau.9.0 Xaw.14.0 Xdmcp.10.0 Xext.12.0 Xmu.10.0 Xpm.8.0 Xt.10.1 c.66.0 expat.10.0 fontconfig.7.0 freetype.18.3 gd.20.35 jpeg.64.0 lcms2.0.2 m.7.1 openjpeg.5.0 png.15.0 poppler.15.0 pthread.17.0 pthread-stubs.1.0 stdc++.55.0 t1.6.0 tiff.39.2 ttf.1.3 xcb.2.3 z.4.1 iconv.6.0 ===> Extracting for texlive_base-2012 *** WARNING: this port uses xz distfiles: it will not build on vax. ===> Patching for texlive_base-2012 ===> Configuring for texlive_base-2012 Using /usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2012/config.site (generated) perl /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/pkg_subst -DMODPY_PYCACHE= -DMODPY_COMMENT=\"@comment\ \" -DMODPY_PYC_MAGIC_TAG= -DMODPY_BIN=/usr/local/bin/python2.7 -DMODPY_EGG_VERSION= -DMODPY_VERSION=2.7 -DMODPY_BIN_SUFFIX= -DMODPY_PY_PREFIX=py- -DMODRUBY_BINREV=18 -DMODPY_VERSION=2.7 -DTRUEPREFIX=/usr/local -DLOCALBASE=/usr/local -D^MODRUBY_RELDOCDIR=share/doc/ruby -D^MODRUBY_RELEXAMPLEDIR=share/examples/ruby -D^MODRUBY_SITEARCHDIR=lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-openbsd -D^MODRUBY_SITEDIR=lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 -DMODRUBY_LIBREV=1.8 -DMODRUBY_ARCH=x86_64-openbsd -DLIBkpathsea_VERSION=5.0 -DLIBptexenc_VERSION=2.0 -DMACHINE_ARCH=amd64 -DARCH=amd64 -DHOMEPAGE=http://tug.org/texlive/ -D^PREFIX=/usr/local -D^SYSCONFDIR=/etc -DFLAVOR_EXT= -DFULLPKGNAME=texlive_base-2012 -DMAINTAINER=Edd\ Barrett\ \ -D^BASE_PKGPATH=print/texlive/base -D^LOCALBASE=/usr/local -D^X11BASE=/usr/X11R6 -D^TRUEPREFIX=/usr/local -D^RCDIR=/etc/rc.d /usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2012/texlive-20120701-sou! rce/texk/texlive/context/mtxrun configure: loading site script /usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2012/config.site checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.2 checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.2 checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... (cached) o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether cc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for native WIN32 or MINGW32... no configure: Assuming `--with-x' configure: Assuming `--enable-biber=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-chktex=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-mtx=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-pmx=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-tpic2pdftex=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-vlna=yes' configure: Assuming `--with-clisp-runtime=system' configure: Assuming `--enable-xpdfopen=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-web2c=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-afm2pl=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-bibtex8=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-bibtexu=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-cjkutils=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-devnag=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-dtl=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-dvidvi=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-dviljk=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-dvipdfmx=yes' configure: Assuming `--enable-dvipng=yes' configure:
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:36:26PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > I have tested plain latex + pdftex based compilers and they work fine > with several documents on amd64 as of last week. Great. Thanks. Anyone else testing this? This is the only test report I have received. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would > appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building > some documents on their systems. > > The extent of my testing so far: > > - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. > - Upgrade path works and is clean. > - Plain latex works. > - pdftex based compilers work. > - texdoc works. > - xindy works. > - ConTeXt works. > > The updated port is here: > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive > > -- > Best Regards > Edd Barrett > > http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk > edd, I have tested plain latex + pdftex based compilers and they work fine with several documents on amd64 as of last week. thanks
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:46:10AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.gz Thanks Stuart. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On 2012/11/06 11:36, Peter Hessler wrote: > can you please post a usable diff, or a url to such a diff? > > On 2012 Nov 06 (Tue) at 10:36:28 + (+), Edd Barrett wrote: > :Hi, > : > :I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would > :appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building > :some documents on their systems. > : > :The extent of my testing so far: > : > : - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. > : - Upgrade path works and is clean. > : - Plain latex works. > : - pdftex based compilers work. > : - texdoc works. > : - xindy works. > : - ConTeXt works. > : > :The updated port is here: > :https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive > : > :-- > :Best Regards > :Edd Barrett > : > :http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk > : > > -- > "The whole world is about three drinks behind." > -- Humphrey Bogart > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.gz Recipe: - pkg_add rsync-- cvsutils - rsync -avC --delete $wipdir $portdir - cvsu - cvs rm `cvsu|grep ^U` - cvs add `cvsu|grep ^?`
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
can you please post a usable diff, or a url to such a diff? On 2012 Nov 06 (Tue) at 10:36:28 + (+), Edd Barrett wrote: :Hi, : :I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would :appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building :some documents on their systems. : :The extent of my testing so far: : : - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. : - Upgrade path works and is clean. : - Plain latex works. : - pdftex based compilers work. : - texdoc works. : - xindy works. : - ConTeXt works. : :The updated port is here: :https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive : :-- :Best Regards :Edd Barrett : :http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk : -- "The whole world is about three drinks behind." -- Humphrey Bogart