CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work on the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the spec: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM Core. If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them to public-webapps by March 2 at the latest. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. -Art Barstow
Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
I support this. / Jonas On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work on > the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the > spec: > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html > > As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM Core. > If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them > to public-webapps by March 2 at the latest. > > As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and > silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. > > -Art Barstow > > >
Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
I also support. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > I support this. > > / Jonas > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow > wrote: > > Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work > on > > the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the > > spec: > > > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html > > > > As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM > Core. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send > them > > to public-webapps by March 2 at the latest. > > > > As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged > and > > silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. > > > > -Art Barstow > > > > > > > >
Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
I support this publication. - Maciej On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work on > the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the spec: > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html > > As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM Core. > If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them to > public-webapps by March 2 at the latest. > > As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and > silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. > > -Art Barstow > >
Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
Hi All, There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to favor PEPO (publish early, publish often). However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmful), for WebApps to publish a spec that conflicts/overlaps with D3E. Additionally, some members have been working on D3E for a relatively long time and they naturally want to preserve their investment. Doug expressed [DS] willingness to change D3E (to align with DOM Core Events) if there is broad consensus for changes. In this spirit of cooperation, before a new WD of DOM Core is published, I think the next step is to do as Doug suggested and identify all D3E issues. Anne asked [AvK] about the mechanism to use to identify issues. Unless Doug suggests otherwise, I recommend using a separate thread per issue on the www-dom mail list. -Art Barstow [DS] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0687.html [AvK] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0722.html On Feb/23/2011 11:20 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work on the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the spec: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM Core. If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them to public-webapps by March 2 at the latest. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal. -Art Barstow
Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:54:08 +0100, Arthur Barstow wrote: There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to favor PEPO (publish early, publish often). However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmful), for WebApps to publish a spec that conflicts/overlaps with D3E. Additionally, some members have been working on D3E for a relatively long time and they naturally want to preserve their investment. Doug expressed [DS] willingness to change D3E (to align with DOM Core Events) if there is broad consensus for changes. In this spirit of cooperation, before a new WD of DOM Core is published, I think the next step is to do as Doug suggested and identify all D3E issues. Anne asked [AvK] about the mechanism to use to identify issues. Unless Doug suggests otherwise, I recommend using a separate thread per issue on the www-dom mail list. I followed your suggestion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2011JanMar/ I also addressed the concerns raised by Adrian. I and Ms2ger also added several people to the list of acknowledgments that we missed initially. Can we publish now? :-) [DS] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0687.html [AvK] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0722.html -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
