[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-27 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

OK, here is patch based on the new policy support in 3.3.  I have some concern 
that the behavior change it introduces might cause some issues, but since it 
seems like a reasonable change and is happening at a feature release boundary, 
I think it should be OK.

The behavior change is that now by default get_payload will always produce 
*some* kind of decoding of a base64 part, and will register defects if it finds 
padding errors or characters outside the base64 character set.

--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25737/base64_payload_defects.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-27 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

Oh, and to be clear on how this addresses the bug report: if you set 
'raise_on_defect' to true when you call the parser, then you'll get an 
exception when you call msg.get_payload(decode=True).

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-27 Thread R. David Murray

Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:


Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file25737/base64_payload_defects.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-27 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

Hmm.  Thinking about it, though, that might not work if there are other errors 
in the message, many of which are more benign.  Probably the raise_on_defect 
control is a little too coarse.

I've been thinking that we need a way to set the policy on an already existing 
message, which would make this work more usefully.  But that's a different 
issue.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25738/base64_payload_defects.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-27 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment:

New changeset 17341b51af4f by R David Murray in branch 'default':
#1672568: email now registers defects for base64 payload format errors.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/17341b51af4f

--
nosy: +python-dev

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-27 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment:

New changeset d68e30be755e by R David Murray in branch 'default':
News item for #1672568.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d68e30be755e

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-27 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

Fix committed.

--
resolution:  - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2012-05-15 Thread R. David Murray

Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:


--
components: +email

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2010-12-02 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

I've taken another look at this, and the email module is pretty consistent 
about just passing through data if it can't interpret it according to 
standards.  I think it would lead to a cluttered API if we add support for 
being strict and raising errors piecemeal.  So I'm deferring this to 3.3 and 
the email6 work, where we plan to have a comprehensive 'strict' mode.

--
keywords:  -easy, patch
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2010-07-24 Thread Mark Lawrence

Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:

I've double checked this and still all tests pass before patching message.py.  
Could somebody else please pick this one up, thanks.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2010-07-16 Thread Mark Lawrence

Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:

To me a bug is a bug is a bug, but I'm sure there are different opinions so 
feel free to swap this back to feature request if you think that fits.  I'll 
try and have a crack at this tomorrow.

--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
type: feature request - behavior
versions: +Python 3.2

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2010-07-16 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

No, it's not a bug if it is working as documented.  (Well, it might be a design 
bug, but fixes to those are called feature requests :)

We're planning on addressing this is email6, by the way.

I'm OK with trying to get this into 3.2, but I'll be giving higher priority to 
bugs.

--
type: behavior - feature request
versions:  -Python 2.7, Python 3.1

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2010-05-05 Thread Barry A. Warsaw

Changes by Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org:


--
assignee: barry - r.david.murray
nosy: +r.david.murray

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2009-05-13 Thread Renaud Blanch

Renaud Blanch rndbl...@gmail.com added the comment:

looks very good to me.
thanks daniel for your work
renaud

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2009-05-11 Thread Daniel Diniz

Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com added the comment:

Renaud,
Here's your patch with a test case against trunk.

--
stage: test needed - patch review
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13967/noisy_get_payload.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2009-04-21 Thread Daniel Diniz

Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com added the comment:

Looks good to me, adding tests and docs could be a nice Bug Day task.

--
keywords: +easy

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2009-04-06 Thread Renaud Blanch

Renaud Blanch rndbl...@gmail.com added the comment:

good idea, why not something like sketched in the attached patch?
it does not break any existing code, while providing a way for new users
to have a chance to get the decoding errors.
of course, the doc should be updated accordingly, and tests should be added.

--
Added file: 
http://bugs.python.org/file13631/unsilent_get_payload_decoding_errors.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2009-04-05 Thread Daniel Diniz

Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com added the comment:

Hmm, ISTM that a change that breaks existing code that relies on
documented behavior has a negligible chance of being accepted.

However, I agree that the current behavior isn't developer-friendly. I
think adding an alternative behavior to get_payload (add a new
parameter?), allowing callers to log errors and/or displaying warnings
could have a better chance of being accepted, while still providing the
control you want.

Barry?

--
keywords: +patch
type: behavior - feature request
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2009-04-03 Thread Renaud Blanch

Renaud Blanch rndbl...@gmail.com added the comment:

Daniel: i can't remember the exact scenario (i filled this bug 2 years
ago !)
after having a look back at email.message.Message.get_payload, i
remember the problem: the decoding errors are silented by the method and
you have no way to know if the decoding has been successful or not.
to find my malformed email i had to patch the module like that
(basically just removing the try/except blocks):

patch
--- message.py.orig 2009-04-03 23:46:47.0 +0200
+++ message.py  2009-04-03 23:48:27.0 +0200
@@ -192,19 +192,11 @@
 if cte == 'quoted-printable':
 return utils._qdecode(payload)
 elif cte == 'base64':
-try:
-return utils._bdecode(payload)
-except binascii.Error:
-# Incorrect padding
-return payload
+return utils._bdecode(payload)
 elif cte in ('x-uuencode', 'uuencode', 'uue', 'x-uue'):
 sfp = StringIO()
-try:
-uu.decode(StringIO(payload+'\n'), sfp, quiet=True)
-payload = sfp.getvalue()
-except uu.Error:
-# Some decoding problem
-return payload
+uu.decode(StringIO(payload+'\n'), sfp, quiet=True)
+return sfp.getvalue()
 # Everything else, including encodings with 8bit or 7bit are
returned
 # unchanged.
 return payload
/patch

once again, the behaviour is documented, so it's not really a bug.
but it caused me a lot of trouble (and it does not conforms very well to
Errors should never pass silently.:)

but i guess applying such a patch could potentially break number of
client code so... is it worth the change?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1672568] silent error in email.message.Message.get_payload

2009-03-30 Thread Daniel Diniz

Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com added the comment:

Renaud: providing a test script would help us here.

--
nosy: +ajaksu2
stage:  - test needed
type:  - behavior
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 3.0

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1672568
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com