[issue22741] suggestion for improving wording on len(s) (built-in function)

2014-10-27 Thread Van Ly

New submission from Van Ly:

-- suggest the following because 
-- the parenthetical parts interrupt the reading too often

len(s)

Returns a length count, the number of objects in argument s which may be a 
sequence, or mapping: a string, list or tuple, or a dictionary.

--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 230068
nosy: docs@python, vy0123
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: suggestion for improving wording on len(s) (built-in function)
type: enhancement
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.5

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22741
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22741] suggestion for improving wording on len(s) (built-in function)

2014-10-27 Thread Ethan Furman

Changes by Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us:


--
nosy: +ethan.furman

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22741
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22741] suggestion for improving wording on len(s) (built-in function)

2014-10-27 Thread Stefan Krah

Stefan Krah added the comment:

The original wording is clearer (this also applies to similar issues
that have been opened recently).

--
nosy: +skrah

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22741
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22741] suggestion for improving wording on len(s) (built-in function)

2014-10-27 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment:

Agreed.  The original follows the rules of standard written English (especially 
as regards to punctuation), while the suggested replacement does not.

--
nosy: +r.david.murray
resolution:  - not a bug
stage:  - resolved
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22741
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22741] suggestion for improving wording on len(s) (built-in function)

2014-10-27 Thread Van Ly

Van Ly added the comment:

(Well that is a stick in the mud and slap in the face attitude to different 
ways of describing what is there.) You have the documentation for len(s) 
perfect, __for_everyone__.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22741
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com