Re: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
On 2/06/2013 3:12 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > Afternoon (UTC+10), > > I'd like to request a new user/pass for a FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT VM guest > I've just setup as a dedicated buildbot slave to complement my other > koobs-freebsd slaves. > > Also, with this and future additions to the FreeBSD buildslave set in > mind, I think it might also be prudent for a rename to take place: > > koobs-freebsd9-amd64 > koobs-freebsd9-amd64-clang (CC=clang) > koobs-freebsd10-amd64 (clang is default here) > > Convention being: koobs-freebsdX[Y]-arch[-config] (Happy for feedback here) > > If there are any permutations or additions you'd like to specifically > see for FreeBSD to increase coverage just let me know (Hint: I have a > PandaBoard arm board here i'm getting up and running) > > I have ZFS & DTrace to work with among other things, and the long term > plan is to have FreeBSD buildbots running the full gamut of versions, > from -RELEASE through -STABLE to HEAD branches. > > I'm on #python-dev IRC if someone needs to discuss. > > -- > Regards, > > Koobs > Ping :) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno < carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:12:43 +1000 > > From: koobs.free...@gmail.com > > To: python-dev@python.org > > Subject: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot > [...] > > koobs-freebsd10-amd64 (clang is default here) > > > Does CPython code compiled with clang runs faster than gcc? > > Why did you chose clang? Any benchmarks? Any benefits? > Clang is sometimes favored over gcc for its non-GPL license; I believe the FreeBSD project sees this as an important issue. In general, the more C compilers a piece of C code compiles on, the fewer bugs are left in it, because different C compilers tend to catch different problems - even with cranked up warnings. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:12:43 +1000 > From: koobs.free...@gmail.com > To: python-dev@python.org > Subject: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot [...] > koobs-freebsd10-amd64 (clang is default here) Does CPython code compiled with clang runs faster than gcc? Why did you chose clang? Any benchmarks? Any benefits? ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
Afternoon (UTC+10), I'd like to request a new user/pass for a FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT VM guest I've just setup as a dedicated buildbot slave to complement my other koobs-freebsd slaves. Also, with this and future additions to the FreeBSD buildslave set in mind, I think it might also be prudent for a rename to take place: koobs-freebsd9-amd64 koobs-freebsd9-amd64-clang (CC=clang) koobs-freebsd10-amd64 (clang is default here) Convention being: koobs-freebsdX[Y]-arch[-config] (Happy for feedback here) If there are any permutations or additions you'd like to specifically see for FreeBSD to increase coverage just let me know (Hint: I have a PandaBoard arm board here i'm getting up and running) I have ZFS & DTrace to work with among other things, and the long term plan is to have FreeBSD buildbots running the full gamut of versions, from -RELEASE through -STABLE to HEAD branches. I'm on #python-dev IRC if someone needs to discuss. -- Regards, Koobs ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com