[Qgis-user] python plugins can't be seen

2013-08-14 Thread 西落
hi,everyone
I am trying to simplify QGIS to make a new system so that I can do my work 
without function modules i don't need. but something goes wrong(I have little 
idea about what had happened,maybe I deleted something important),so IS there 
anyone knows about how to make the plugin loader recognize a python plugin like 
sextante ? C++ plugins seems to be ok, but no python plugins can be seem in the 
qgis plugin selecting dialog. Thanks in advance.




 ___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-29 Thread Gary Sherman

On Jun 28, 2012, at 14:26, Pirmin Kalberer pi...@sourcepole.com wrote:

 
 I was surprised as well that the 3rd party button has been removed. Can you 
 point me to the discussion thread leading to this decision?

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2012-May/001117.html

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/2012-May/001119.html

-Gary
GeoApt LLC
Chair, Quantum GIS PSC
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-28 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 27/06/2012 20:29, Lee Hachadoorian ha scritto:

 IIUC, any plugin that satisfies some minimal requirements (no
 malicious code, at least minimal documentation, etc.) will get
 approved for Official. Is the idea that all plugins from Contributed
 should migrate to Official (at the authors' initiation and timetable)
 and Contributed will go away?

Yes. Please anybode consider helping or sponsoring develoipers to speed up the
migration of your preferred plugin.
All the best.
-- 
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-28 Thread Alex Mandel
On 06/28/2012 03:26 PM, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
 Hi Paolo,
 
 Am Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012, 16.49:13 schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
 Il 27/06/2012 16:44, Luca Casagrande ha scritto:
 All was fine, but some users were confused about the missing third part
 repository button.
 I think that would be nice to keep the button and show a dialogue window
 with the explanation of what happened.
 What do you think about?

 -1
 I think the current situation is cleaner; the only problem is migrating the
 plugins (at least those of general use) to the new infrastructure, which
 has major advantages. Unfortunately it seems that some of the plugins devs
 have not time nor interest to do the migration in these days.
 
 I was surprised as well that the 3rd party button has been removed. Can you 
 point me to the discussion thread leading to this decision? The options on 
 the 
 third tab do still imply 3rd party repositories.
 
 An incomplete list of plugins, which users of 1.8 won't ever find:
 -EasyPrint
 -CAD Tools
 -Click-Fu
 -TopoColour
 -OpenLayers plugin
 -Mapfile tools
 -Metatools
 -Interlis plugin
 -Quantumnik
 -OSM Tools
 
 Who is coordinating the transfer of all plugins to the new repo?
 
 Regards
 Pirmin
 
 

Nobody (afaik), it's been left up to the authors of the plugins to
migrate them. Want to suggest a grace period after which we let anyone
do it (Not that there's any technical reason stopping anyone right now)?

I thought OSM shipped with QGIS now. Are you sure all of those plugins
are still supported and work with 1.8?

Users can still add all the 3rd party repos they want, we just tried to
make that less appealing (you must do it by hand) in the hopes that
authors would finally move their plugins.

Thanks,
Alex

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


[Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-27 Thread Luca Casagrande
Hello everybody,
on Monday we had a QGis course and we decided to use 1.8. 
All was fine, but some users were confused about the missing third part
repository button. 
I think that would be nice to keep the button and show a dialogue window
with the explanation of what happened.
What do you think about?

Thx for all
Luca



--
View this message in context: 
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Python-plugins-for-1-8-tp4984257.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-27 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 27/06/2012 16:44, Luca Casagrande ha scritto:

 All was fine, but some users were confused about the missing third part
 repository button. 
 I think that would be nice to keep the button and show a dialogue window
 with the explanation of what happened.
 What do you think about?

-1
I think the current situation is cleaner; the only problem is migrating the 
plugins
(at least those of general use) to the new infrastructure, which has major
advantages. Unfortunately it seems that some of the plugins devs have not time 
nor
interest to do the migration in these days.
All the best.

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-27 Thread Micha Silver

  
  
On 27/06/2012 17:49, Paolo Cavallini
  wrote:


  Il 27/06/2012 16:44, Luca Casagrande ha scritto:


  
All was fine, but some users were confused about the missing "third part
repository" button. 
I think that would be nice to keep the button and show a dialogue window
with the explanation of what happened.
What do you think about?

  
  
-1
I think the current situation is cleaner; the only problem is migrating the plugins
(at least those of general use) to the new infrastructure, which has major
advantages. Unfortunately it seems that some of the plugins devs have not time nor
interest to do the migration in these days.
All the best.



In the interim, until all repos are migrated, how
  about a link to [1] in the Add plugins window to help users with
  the Add button?
  
  [1]
  http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/wiki/Python_Plugin_Repositories
  

-- 
Micha Silver
052-3665918

  

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-27 Thread Luca Casagrande

Paolo Cavallini wrote
 
 Il 27/06/2012 16:44, Luca Casagrande ha scritto:
 
 All was fine, but some users were confused about the missing third part
 repository button. 
 I think that would be nice to keep the button and show a dialogue window
 with the explanation of what happened.
 What do you think about?
 
 -1
 I think the current situation is cleaner; the only problem is migrating
 the plugins
 (at least those of general use) to the new infrastructure, which has major
 advantages. Unfortunately it seems that some of the plugins devs have not
 time nor
 interest to do the migration in these days.
 All the best.
 

I know that the problem is migrating the plugins to the new infrastructure,
but some users who update or install 1.8 don't know this situation.
My idea is to write something to explain this.

L.


--
View this message in context: 
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Python-plugins-for-1-8-tp4984257p4984270.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


Re: [Qgis-user] Python plugins for 1.8

2012-06-27 Thread Lee Hachadoorian
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Luca Casagrande
luca.casagra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Paolo Cavallini wrote

 Il 27/06/2012 16:44, Luca Casagrande ha scritto:

 All was fine, but some users were confused about the missing third part
 repository button.
 I think that would be nice to keep the button and show a dialogue window
 with the explanation of what happened.
 What do you think about?

 -1
 I think the current situation is cleaner; the only problem is migrating
 the plugins
 (at least those of general use) to the new infrastructure, which has major
 advantages. Unfortunately it seems that some of the plugins devs have not
 time nor
 interest to do the migration in these days.
 All the best.


 I know that the problem is migrating the plugins to the new infrastructure,
 but some users who update or install 1.8 don't know this situation.
 My idea is to write something to explain this.

 L.

I know the docs are currently undergoing revision, but currently the
instructions at
http://docs.qgis.org/user_guide/html/en/plugins/plugins.html#repositories-tab
still say to click the Add 3rd party repositories button.

Last night I added the QGIS Contributed Repository to 1.8 to get a
plugin I used in 1.7.4 that is not (yet?) in Official, but I'm a
little unclear about whether the distinction between Official and
Contributed will be meaningful going forward.
IIUC, any plugin that satisfies some minimal requirements (no
malicious code, at least minimal documentation, etc.) will get
approved for Official. Is the idea that all plugins from Contributed
should migrate to Official (at the authors' initiation and timetable)
and Contributed will go away?

--Lee

-- 
Lee Hachadoorian
PhD, Earth  Environmental Sciences (Geography)
Research Associate, CUNY Center for Urban Research
http://freecity.commons.gc.cuny.edu/
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


[Qgis-user] python plugins

2008-10-12 Thread JC Notter

Hi,

I can't install Python plugins on  win2000 or winXP with 0.11 or 1.0 
except mapserver export and plugin installer.


Example :
Impossible de charger le plugin postgps provoque une erreur lors de 
l'appel de sa méthode classFactory()


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File , line 1, in
  File C:/Documents and 
Settings/jcnotter/.qgis//python/plugins\postgps\__init__.py, line 23, 
in classFactory

from postgps import PostGPS
  File C:/Documents and 
Settings/jcnotter/.qgis//python/plugins\postgps\postgps.py, line 20, in

import psycopg2
ImportError: No module named psycopg2

Python version:
2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)]

Python path:
['C:/Program Files/QGIS/./python', 'C:/Documents and 
Settings/jcnotter/.qgis//python/plugins', 'C:/Program 
Files/QGIS/./python/plugins', 'C:\\Program Files\\QGIS\\python25.zip', 
'C:\\Python25\\Lib', 'C:\\Python25\\DLLs', 'C:\\Python25\\Lib\\lib-tk', 
'C:\\Program Files\\QGIS', 'C:\\Python25', 
'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages']


Thank you

JC - La Reunion Island
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


[Qgis-user] python plugins

2008-08-27 Thread Gonzalo Gutiérrez Narváez
H everyone, I used to work with arcview and other commercial gis software,
but now I trying to use qgis.  My problem is i have no experience about
program in any language.  I want to learn to use and to made my own pynthon
plugins.   Any recomendation about where I should beggin, in wich language,
something simple..?
Thanks to everybody

Gonzalo, from Chile
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


[Qgis-user] python plugins missing in Metis

2008-07-16 Thread maning sambale
Hi,

After upgrading to Metis, I can't find my python plugins in the plugin manager

Any ideas?

cheers,
maning

-- 
|-|--|
| __.-._  |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great. -Yoda |
| '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden|
|  /'.-c  |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ |
|  |  /T  |http://esambale.wikispaces.com|
| _)_/LI
|-|--|
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user