Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Jake Vickers 

Alberto Maffini wrote:
Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 
month ago I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow 
(approx 30 sec). I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due 
to my stupidity I deleted /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and 
/var/qmail/control/blacklists and /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. 
Since that moment I am receiving tons of spam mail
 
Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?
 


Replace those files.
Run sa-update to update your spamassassin rules, and add more rules.  
You could also look at Spamdyke and implement the greylisting feature.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Alberto Maffini 
Are you talking about recompile all the software ? Do I will loose all the 
mailboxes ?

Alberto Maffini

mobile +39.348.3677402

Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
http://www.sylcomed.com


  - Original Message - 
  From: Janno Sannik 
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:41 PM
  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


  get the packages. rebuild them (might not even be necessary)  and extract the 
needed configuration files from packages.

  my spamassassin configuration has following new lines (5 points is still the 
spam limit):
  skip_rbl_checks 0
  score   BAYES_994.9
  score   DRUGS_ERECTILE  4.0
  score   DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU 4.0
  score   NO_DNS_FOR_FROM 10.0
  score   DRUGS_PAIN  4.0
  score   MALE_ENHANCE4.0

  # dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
  header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect1', 
'dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
  describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
  tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 net
  score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 4.0

  # dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
  header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect2', 
'dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net.', '127.0.0.2')
  describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
  tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 net
  score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 1.0

  # dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
  header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect3', 
'dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
  describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
  tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 net
  score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 1.0


  Alberto Maffini wrote: 
Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 month 
ago I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 sec). 
I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I deleted 
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists and 
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. Since that moment I am receiving tons of spam 
mail

Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?

Following a sample message:

Received: (qmail 19970 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 11:24:53 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 19965, pid: 19967, t: 0.4072s
 scanners:none
Received: from unknown (HELO ns2.qmailtoaster.com) (209.177.154.102)
  by ariel.sylcomed.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Jul 
2008 11:24:53 -
Received-SPF: none (ariel.sylcomed.com: domain at qmailtoaster.com does not 
designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: (qmail 20998 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Delivered-To: mailing list qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on 
ns2.qmailtoaster.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_SIGNED,
 HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1 autolearn=no version=3.1.8
Received-SPF: pass (ns2.qmailtoaster.com: SPF record at _spf.google.com 
designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)

Thanks a lot

Alberto Maffini

mobile +39.348.3677402

Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
http://www.sylcomed.com





  __ Informazione NOD32 3302 (20080728) __

  Questo messaggio è stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32
  http://www.nod32.it

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Anil Aliyan 
Simply Create those files (simcontrol, badmailfrom and blacklists) again and 
put whatever u want to scan and block.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Alberto Maffini 
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:24 PM
  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


  Are you talking about recompile all the software ? Do I will loose all the 
mailboxes ?

  Alberto Maffini

  mobile +39.348.3677402

  Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
  Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
  Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
  http://www.sylcomed.com


- Original Message - 
From: Janno Sannik 
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


get the packages. rebuild them (might not even be necessary)  and extract 
the needed configuration files from packages.

my spamassassin configuration has following new lines (5 points is still 
the spam limit):
skip_rbl_checks 0
score   BAYES_994.9
score   DRUGS_ERECTILE  4.0
score   DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU 4.0
score   NO_DNS_FOR_FROM 10.0
score   DRUGS_PAIN  4.0
score   MALE_ENHANCE4.0

# dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect1', 
'dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 net
score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 4.0

# dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect2', 
'dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net.', '127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 net
score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 1.0

# dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect3', 
'dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 net
score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 1.0


Alberto Maffini wrote: 
  Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 month 
ago I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 sec). 
I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I deleted 
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists and 
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. Since that moment I am receiving tons of spam 
mail

  Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?

  Following a sample message:

  Received: (qmail 19970 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 11:24:53 -
  Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 19965, pid: 19967, t: 0.4072s
   scanners:none
  Received: from unknown (HELO ns2.qmailtoaster.com) (209.177.154.102)
by ariel.sylcomed.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Jul 
2008 11:24:53 -
  Received-SPF: none (ariel.sylcomed.com: domain at qmailtoaster.com does 
not designate permitted sender hosts)
  Received: (qmail 20998 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
  Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
  Precedence: bulk
  List-Post: mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Delivered-To: mailing list qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
  X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on 
ns2.qmailtoaster.com
  X-Spam-Level: 
  X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_SIGNED,
   HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1 autolearn=no version=3.1.8
  Received-SPF: pass (ns2.qmailtoaster.com: SPF record at _spf.google.com 
designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)

  Thanks a lot

  Alberto Maffini

  mobile +39.348.3677402

  Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
  Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
  Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
  http://www.sylcomed.com





__ Informazione NOD32 3302 (20080728) __

Questo messaggio è stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32
http://www.nod32.it

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Alberto Maffini 
Ok :-) My question was What I have to put inside those files to fight spam ? 
...

Sorry for not explain correctly ..

Alberto Maffini

mobile +39.348.3677402

Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
http://www.sylcomed.com


  - Original Message - 
  From: Anil Aliyan 
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


  Simply Create those files (simcontrol, badmailfrom and blacklists) again and 
put whatever u want to scan and block.
- Original Message - 
From: Alberto Maffini 
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


Are you talking about recompile all the software ? Do I will loose all the 
mailboxes ?

Alberto Maffini

mobile +39.348.3677402

Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
http://www.sylcomed.com


  - Original Message - 
  From: Janno Sannik 
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:41 PM
  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


  get the packages. rebuild them (might not even be necessary)  and extract 
the needed configuration files from packages.

  my spamassassin configuration has following new lines (5 points is still 
the spam limit):
  skip_rbl_checks 0
  score   BAYES_994.9
  score   DRUGS_ERECTILE  4.0
  score   DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU 4.0
  score   NO_DNS_FOR_FROM 10.0
  score   DRUGS_PAIN  4.0
  score   MALE_ENHANCE4.0

  # dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
  header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect1', 
'dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
  describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
  tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 net
  score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 4.0

  # dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
  header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect2', 
'dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net.', '127.0.0.2')
  describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
  tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 net
  score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 1.0

  # dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
  header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect3', 
'dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
  describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
  tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 net
  score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 1.0


  Alberto Maffini wrote: 
Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 
month ago I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 
sec). I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I 
deleted /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists and 
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. Since that moment I am receiving tons of spam 
mail

Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?

Following a sample message:

Received: (qmail 19970 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 11:24:53 -
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 19965, pid: 19967, t: 0.4072s
 scanners:none
Received: from unknown (HELO ns2.qmailtoaster.com) (209.177.154.102)
  by ariel.sylcomed.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 
Jul 2008 11:24:53 -
Received-SPF: none (ariel.sylcomed.com: domain at qmailtoaster.com does 
not designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: (qmail 20998 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Delivered-To: mailing list qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on 
ns2.qmailtoaster.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_SIGNED,
 HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1 autolearn=no version=3.1.8
Received-SPF: pass (ns2.qmailtoaster.com: SPF record at _spf.google.com 
designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)

Thanks a lot

Alberto Maffini

mobile +39.348.3677402

Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
http://www.sylcomed.com





  __ Informazione NOD32 3302 (20080728) __

  Questo messaggio è stato

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Anil Aliyan 
for simcontrol please refer to this link 
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Simscan
  - Original Message - 
  From: Alberto Maffini 
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:43 PM
  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


  Ok :-) My question was What I have to put inside those files to fight spam 
? ...

  Sorry for not explain correctly ..

  Alberto Maffini

  mobile +39.348.3677402

  Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
  Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
  Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
  http://www.sylcomed.com


- Original Message - 
From: Anil Aliyan 
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


Simply Create those files (simcontrol, badmailfrom and blacklists) again 
and put whatever u want to scan and block.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Alberto Maffini 
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:24 PM
  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


  Are you talking about recompile all the software ? Do I will loose all 
the mailboxes ?

  Alberto Maffini

  mobile +39.348.3677402

  Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
  Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
  Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
  http://www.sylcomed.com


- Original Message - 
From: Janno Sannik 
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


get the packages. rebuild them (might not even be necessary)  and 
extract the needed configuration files from packages.

my spamassassin configuration has following new lines (5 points is 
still the spam limit):
skip_rbl_checks 0
score   BAYES_994.9
score   DRUGS_ERECTILE  4.0
score   DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU 4.0
score   NO_DNS_FOR_FROM 10.0
score   DRUGS_PAIN  4.0
score   MALE_ENHANCE4.0

# dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect1', 
'dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 net
score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 4.0

# dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect2', 
'dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net.', '127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net
tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 net
score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2 1.0

# dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
header RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 rbleval:check_rbl('uceprotect3', 
'dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net.','127.0.0.2')
describe RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 Received via a blocked site in 
dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
tflags RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 net
score RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 1.0


Alberto Maffini wrote: 
  Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 
month ago I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 
sec). I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I 
deleted /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists and 
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. Since that moment I am receiving tons of spam 
mail

  Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?

  Following a sample message:

  Received: (qmail 19970 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 11:24:53 -
  Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 19965, pid: 19967, t: 0.4072s
   scanners:none
  Received: from unknown (HELO ns2.qmailtoaster.com) (209.177.154.102)
by ariel.sylcomed.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 
Jul 2008 11:24:53 -
  Received-SPF: none (ariel.sylcomed.com: domain at qmailtoaster.com 
does not designate permitted sender hosts)
  Received: (qmail 20998 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
  Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
  Precedence: bulk
  List-Post: mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Delivered-To: mailing list qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
  X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on 
ns2.qmailtoaster.com
  X-Spam-Level: 
  X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_SIGNED,
   HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1 autolearn=no version=3.1.8

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Anil Aliyan 
For blacklists please refer to this link

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/RBLs



  - Original Message - 
  From: Alberto Maffini 
  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:04 PM
  Subject: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam


  Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 month ago 
I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 sec). I 
found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I deleted 
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists and 
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. Since that moment I am receiving tons of spam 
mail

  Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?

  Following a sample message:

  Received: (qmail 19970 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 11:24:53 -
  Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 19965, pid: 19967, t: 0.4072s
   scanners:none
  Received: from unknown (HELO ns2.qmailtoaster.com) (209.177.154.102)
by ariel.sylcomed.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Jul 2008 
11:24:53 -
  Received-SPF: none (ariel.sylcomed.com: domain at qmailtoaster.com does not 
designate permitted sender hosts)
  Received: (qmail 20998 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
  Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
  Precedence: bulk
  List-Post: mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Delivered-To: mailing list qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
  Received: (qmail 20991 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2008 12:14:49 -
  X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on 
ns2.qmailtoaster.com
  X-Spam-Level: 
  X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_SIGNED,
   HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1 autolearn=no version=3.1.8
  Received-SPF: pass (ns2.qmailtoaster.com: SPF record at _spf.google.com 
designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)

  Thanks a lot

  Alberto Maffini

  mobile +39.348.3677402

  Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250
  Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
  Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608
  http://www.sylcomed.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Jake Vickers 

Alberto Maffini wrote:
Ok :-) My question was What I have to put inside those files to fight 
spam ? ...
 
Sorry for not explain correctly ..
 



To get the defaults back (should be your first move) look at the wiki - 
I believe we have all the files documented on there with the defaults: 
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com

RE: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread António Pedro Lima 
I would look into spamdyke, trust me.

I was stressing with spam, and was looking into RBLs and sa-updates, etc etc
etc…

Tried spamdyke and my stress was gone.

You probably will need to tune it a little, but will be once.

For my case at least it was…


António Pedro Lima



  _  

De: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviada: segunda-feira, 28 de Julho de 2008 12:42
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

 

Alberto Maffini wrote: 

Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 month ago
I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 sec).
I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I
deleted /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists and
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. Since that moment I am receiving tons of
spam mail

 

Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?

 


Replace those files.
Run sa-update to update your spamassassin rules, and add more rules.  You
could also look at Spamdyke and implement the greylisting feature.

RE: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Sergio Minini (NETKEY) 
+1 for spamdyke
The best solution ever to help QM against spam.
www.spamdyke.org.
 
Good luck- Sergio

-Original Message-
From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:05 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam



I would look into spamdyke, trust me.

I was stressing with spam, and was looking into RBLs and sa-updates, etc etc
etc…

Tried spamdyke and my stress was gone.

You probably will need to tune it a little, but will be once.

For my case at least it was…


António Pedro Lima




  _  


De: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Enviada: segunda-feira, 28 de Julho de 2008 12:42
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

 

Alberto Maffini wrote: 

Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 month ago I
had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 sec). I
found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I deleted
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists and
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom. Since that moment I am receiving tons of spam
mail

 

Is there someone can help me hardening the sistem fighting spam ?

 


Replace those files.
Run sa-update to update your spamassassin rules, and add more rules.  You could
also look at Spamdyke and implement the greylisting feature.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread dnk 


On 28-Jul-08, at 10:29 AM, Sergio Minini (NETKEY) wrote:


+1 for spamdyke
The best solution ever to help QM against spam.
www.spamdyke.org.

Good luck- Sergio


+2

Huge reduction in spam for me.

d