Re: [R] image 256 x 920 data points too slow
Thanks, it works nicely. In the meantime, I came across a similar
approach taken in the documentation of ggplot2, using a small sample
of the diamonds data.
Thanks all again,
baptiste
On 21 Oct 2007, at 12:25, Katharine Mullen wrote:
> I'm not aware of any existing function that does what you want, but
> you
> could easily write a function to sample from x, y, z, and then pass
> the
> sampled values to image. e.g.,
>
> sam <- function(sx,sy,x,y,z){
> xind<-seq(1,length(x),by=sx)
> yind<-seq(1,length(y),by=sy)
> samplex<-x[xind]
> sampley<-y[yind]
> samplez<-z[xind,yind]
> list(x=samplex,y=sampley,z=samplez)
> }
> newval<-sam(sx=13.3,sy=15,x=x,y=y,z=z)
> image(newval$x,newval$y,newval$z)
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, [ISO-8859-1] baptiste Auguié wrote:
>
>> Dear R gurus,
>>
>> I'm trying to visualize a matrix 256 x 920 using image(), but i find
>> the display too slow (~ 1 minute –– admittedly, my iBook G4 isn't
>> very fast). The aim is not to get a good resolution image, but rather
>> have a quick look at the matrix. I couldn't find a way to plot a
>> smaller set of points from my data in a sensible manner (basically, i
>> want to decrease the resolution). Is there an easy option for this
>> purpose in image(), or possibly the lattice equivalent?
>>
>> Minimal example:
>>
>> x<-c(1:256)
>> y<-c(1:920)
>> z<-x%*%t(y)
>> image(x,y,z)
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> baptiste
>>
>> __
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-
>> guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] image 256 x 920 data points too slow
Take a looks at the 'hexbin' package on BioConductor. It may give you want you want. On 10/21/07, baptiste Auguié <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear R gurus, > > I'm trying to visualize a matrix 256 x 920 using image(), but i find > the display too slow (~ 1 minute –– admittedly, my iBook G4 isn't > very fast). The aim is not to get a good resolution image, but rather > have a quick look at the matrix. I couldn't find a way to plot a > smaller set of points from my data in a sensible manner (basically, i > want to decrease the resolution). Is there an easy option for this > purpose in image(), or possibly the lattice equivalent? > > Minimal example: > > x<-c(1:256) > y<-c(1:920) > z<-x%*%t(y) > image(x,y,z) > > > Best regards, > > baptiste > > __ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- Jim Holtman Cincinnati, OH +1 513 646 9390 What is the problem you are trying to solve? __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] image 256 x 920 data points too slow
I'm not aware of any existing function that does what you want, but you
could easily write a function to sample from x, y, z, and then pass the
sampled values to image. e.g.,
sam <- function(sx,sy,x,y,z){
xind<-seq(1,length(x),by=sx)
yind<-seq(1,length(y),by=sy)
samplex<-x[xind]
sampley<-y[yind]
samplez<-z[xind,yind]
list(x=samplex,y=sampley,z=samplez)
}
newval<-sam(sx=13.3,sy=15,x=x,y=y,z=z)
image(newval$x,newval$y,newval$z)
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, [ISO-8859-1] baptiste Auguié wrote:
> Dear R gurus,
>
> I'm trying to visualize a matrix 256 x 920 using image(), but i find
> the display too slow (~ 1 minute –– admittedly, my iBook G4 isn't
> very fast). The aim is not to get a good resolution image, but rather
> have a quick look at the matrix. I couldn't find a way to plot a
> smaller set of points from my data in a sensible manner (basically, i
> want to decrease the resolution). Is there an easy option for this
> purpose in image(), or possibly the lattice equivalent?
>
> Minimal example:
>
> x<-c(1:256)
> y<-c(1:920)
> z<-x%*%t(y)
> image(x,y,z)
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> baptiste
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] image 256 x 920 data points too slow
Dear R gurus, I'm trying to visualize a matrix 256 x 920 using image(), but i find the display too slow (~ 1 minute –– admittedly, my iBook G4 isn't very fast). The aim is not to get a good resolution image, but rather have a quick look at the matrix. I couldn't find a way to plot a smaller set of points from my data in a sensible manner (basically, i want to decrease the resolution). Is there an easy option for this purpose in image(), or possibly the lattice equivalent? Minimal example: x<-c(1:256) y<-c(1:920) z<-x%*%t(y) image(x,y,z) Best regards, baptiste __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
