Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Phil Miller wrote: > KDE has some issues with qt-4.8.0. > > One of it is regarding QUrl.toLocalfile: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749213 probably of more interest is following these, https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com//browse/QTBUG-22382 and it's impact on kde: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285028 > Patching qt with followed patch fixes it: > > qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0-QUrl_toLocalFile.patch Not exactly "fix", but more of a workaround to restore qt47 behavior in the meantime. -- rex ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Hello again I read through the Chakra thread. Very interesting. I've not experienced any of those bugs. I have two boxes with qt 4.8. As for the distro, I have one multilib Gentoo install and one LFS no multilib. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions. Harry --- On Mon, 12/26/11, Phil Miller wrote: From: Phil Miller Subject: Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1) To: "KDE release coordination" Date: Monday, December 26, 2011, 2:54 PM May I ask what distro you are using? We have several issues with QT 4.8 and discussing that in our mailing-list: http://groups.google.com/group/chakra- devel/browse_thread/thread/db11f92846e962f Am Montag, 26. Dezember 2011, 13:20:52 schrieb Harry Miller: > Hi, > > I've built kde 4.7.95 against qt 4.8 and haven't had any issues. Infact, it > ran a little faster and a lot more reliably when built against 4.8 than it > ever did for me against 4.7.4. I didn't use any patches either. I wasn't > aware that there was one, let alone that it was needed. > > Good luck. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
May I ask what distro you are using? We have several issues with QT 4.8 and discussing that in our mailing-list: http://groups.google.com/group/chakra- devel/browse_thread/thread/db11f92846e962f Am Montag, 26. Dezember 2011, 13:20:52 schrieb Harry Miller: > Hi, > > I've built kde 4.7.95 against qt 4.8 and haven't had any issues. Infact, it > ran a little faster and a lot more reliably when built against 4.8 than it > ever did for me against 4.7.4. I didn't use any patches either. I wasn't > aware that there was one, let alone that it was needed. > > Good luck. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Hi, I've built kde 4.7.95 against qt 4.8 and haven't had any issues. Infact, it ran a little faster and a lot more reliably when built against 4.8 than it ever did for me against 4.7.4. I didn't use any patches either. I wasn't aware that there was one, let alone that it was needed. Good luck. --- On Mon, 12/26/11, Phil Miller wrote: From: Phil Miller Subject: Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1) To: "KDE release coordination" Date: Monday, December 26, 2011, 9:21 AM KDE has some issues with qt-4.8.0. One of it is regarding QUrl.toLocalfile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749213 Patching qt with followed patch fixes it: qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0-QUrl_toLocalFile.patch Does anybody else has issues with KDE 4.7.95 build against qt-4.8.0 or would it be better to build the next RC against qt-4.7.4 again? -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
KDE has some issues with qt-4.8.0. One of it is regarding QUrl.toLocalfile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749213 Patching qt with followed patch fixes it: qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0-QUrl_toLocalFile.patch Does anybody else has issues with KDE 4.7.95 build against qt-4.8.0 or would it be better to build the next RC against qt-4.7.4 again?diff -up qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0/src/corelib/io/qurl.cpp.toLocalFile qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0/src/corelib/io/qurl.cpp --- qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0/src/corelib/io/qurl.cpp.toLocalFile 2011-10-03 22:44:32.0 -0500 +++ qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0/src/corelib/io/qurl.cpp 2011-10-27 12:58:35.706815049 -0500 @@ -6158,7 +6158,8 @@ QUrl QUrl::fromLocalFile(const QString & QString QUrl::toLocalFile() const { // the call to isLocalFile() also ensures that we're parsed -if (!isLocalFile()) +// Treat URLs with no scheme as local for backward compatibility +if (!isLocalFile() && (!d || !d->scheme.isEmpty())) return QString(); QString tmp;___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team