Re: Minor Point Relase Policy Draft
A Dijous, 27 de gener de 2011, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: A Dilluns, 24 de gener de 2011, Rex Dieter va escriure: http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft I did some edits. So did anyone have a look at my edits to that page? Do they make sense for you? It's something we could agree on? Agreement from me. Ok, let's make it more fun. If by next month noone has oposed i'll remove the Draft part and make it a official policy. Moved it to non Draft, now we need someone to edit http://techbase.kde.org/Policies and add it, it seems i do have enough karma for that. Albert Albert -- Rex ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Minor Point Relase Policy Draft
A Dilluns, 24 de gener de 2011, Rex Dieter va escriure: http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft I did some edits. So did anyone have a look at my edits to that page? Do they make sense for you? It's something we could agree on? Agreement from me. Ok, let's make it more fun. If by next month noone has oposed i'll remove the Draft part and make it a official policy. Albert -- Rex ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Minor Point Relase Policy Draft
A Dilluns, 29 de novembre de 2010, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: A Diumenge, 28 de novembre de 2010, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:28:23PM +, Albert Astals Cid wrote: A Diumenge, 28 de novembre de 2010, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:16:47PM +, Albert Astals Cid wrote: http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft Yes the problem is that the policy contradicts what we are doing in reality. That's why there wasn't consensus. So improvements welcome, it's a wiki :) I thought you *needed* it to be exactly like that to convince your bosses at ubuntu to let you ship updates as part of the stable updates or something, if we change it to reflect reality I guess it won't be acceptable. But if you want I can update it with what i think is what we are doing now. That was my reason for starting on it but I think it would be a good thing for KDE to have generally and I think it should be influenced but not dictated by our downstreams, and it's pointless if it doesn't reflect reality. So please do edit and see if consensus can be found. I did some edits. So did anyone have a look at my edits to that page? Do they make sense for you? It's something we could agree on? Albert Albert Jonathan ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Minor Point Relase Policy Draft
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft I did some edits. So did anyone have a look at my edits to that page? Do they make sense for you? It's something we could agree on? Agreement from me. -- Rex ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
