RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ ....

2008-08-23 Thread Barry

If all else fails a pressure pack of silver paint provides decent protection as 
well..
 Long as it seals 

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:51:19 -0500
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ 




















Most of the advice given here about taping antenna connections 
and the 

techniques has been right on. However, I've been using Scotch 88 for sealing 

connectors since about 1970 as it is twice as thick as 33+. Supposedly the 

same material, just thicker.



I was also taught to spray the connections with clear Krylon before and 

after taping. Also, spray it on all the external hardware, nuts and bolts, 

etc. It dries so thin that the hardware can be easily removed but does 

provide protection against corrosion, at least for a few years.



Al, K9SI




  



















_
Win a Nokia E51 with mobile Hotmail SMS alertsĀ  
http://www.livelife.ninemsn.com.au/compIntro.aspx?compId=4589

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ ....

2008-08-23 Thread Chuck Kelsey
88 was supposed to be a better tape for use (applied) in cold weather. 33+ 
still gets my vote overall.

Chuck
WB2EDV



  - Original Message - 
  From: Maire-Radios 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 11:09 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ 


  yes when we did traffic signal installs they always had us use 88 and 
sometimes a gray tape that the phone co had and it was used for a lot of the 
wires that got cover in the ground.


- Original Message - 
From: Al Wolfe 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:51 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ 


Most of the advice given here about taping antenna connections and the 
techniques has been right on. However, I've been using Scotch 88 for 
sealing 
connectors since about 1970 as it is twice as thick as 33+. Supposedly the 
same material, just thicker.

I was also taught to spray the connections with clear Krylon before and 
after taping. Also, spray it on all the external hardware, nuts and bolts, 
etc. It dries so thin that the hardware can be easily removed but does 
provide protection against corrosion, at least for a few years.

Al, K9SI



   

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ ....

2008-08-23 Thread Eric Lemmon
Yes, the 88 tape is thicker than the 33, but not by much:  8.5 mil versus
7.0 mil.  Here's the info:
http://tinyurl.com/58qmmr

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:49 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ 

At 8/23/2008 19:23, you wrote:
>Yep. 88 is the thicker version of 33+. However, I prefer the 33+.
>
>Chuck
>WB2EDV

I tried 88 once. For some reason it didn't stick as well as 33+.

Bob NO6B



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ ....

2008-08-23 Thread Maire-Radios
yes when we did traffic signal installs they always had us use 88 and sometimes 
a gray tape that the phone co had and it was used for a lot of the wires that 
got cover in the ground.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Al Wolfe 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:51 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ 


  Most of the advice given here about taping antenna connections and the 
  techniques has been right on. However, I've been using Scotch 88 for sealing 
  connectors since about 1970 as it is twice as thick as 33+. Supposedly the 
  same material, just thicker.

  I was also taught to spray the connections with clear Krylon before and 
  after taping. Also, spray it on all the external hardware, nuts and bolts, 
  etc. It dries so thin that the hardware can be easily removed but does 
  provide protection against corrosion, at least for a few years.

  Al, K9SI



   

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ ....

2008-08-23 Thread no6b
At 8/23/2008 19:23, you wrote:
>Yep. 88 is the thicker version of 33+. However, I prefer the 33+.
>
>Chuck
>WB2EDV

I tried 88 once.  For some reason it didn't stick as well as 33+.

Bob NO6B



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ ....

2008-08-23 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Yep. 88 is the thicker version of 33+. However, I prefer the 33+.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: "Al Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:51 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ 


>Most of the advice given here about taping antenna connections and the
> techniques has been right on. However, I've been using Scotch 88 for 
> sealing
> connectors since about 1970 as it is twice as thick as 33+. Supposedly the
> same material, just thicker.
>
>I was also taught to spray the connections with clear Krylon before and
> after taping. Also, spray it on all the external hardware, nuts and bolts,
> etc. It dries so thin that the hardware can be easily removed but does
> provide protection against corrosion, at least for a few years.
>
> Al, K9SI
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>



[Repeater-Builder] Re: We all Love Super 33+ ....

2008-08-23 Thread Al Wolfe
Most of the advice given here about taping antenna connections and the 
techniques has been right on. However, I've been using Scotch 88 for sealing 
connectors since about 1970 as it is twice as thick as 33+. Supposedly the 
same material, just thicker.

I was also taught to spray the connections with clear Krylon before and 
after taping. Also, spray it on all the external hardware, nuts and bolts, 
etc. It dries so thin that the hardware can be easily removed but does 
provide protection against corrosion, at least for a few years.

Al, K9SI