Totals / Reports?
I need a simple way to get the total number of reviews in a group. We've assigned all the code reviews into groups based on project. Project management has to report the total number of code reviews completed for a project to our partner. When you look at the group view it only gives you a count of the pending reviews, no total count. Obviously in an ideal world there will be better reports some day, but for now I just need an easy way to get this number when needed. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Totals / Reports?
That worked. I wanted the total number of review requests, not the
number of reviews. Perhaps that could be added as a column some day
to the groups page.
On Jan 5, 2:21 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Chris Clark wrote:
> > grimbeaver wrote:
>
> >> I need a simple way to get the total number of reviews in a group.
> >> We've assigned all the code reviews into groups based on project.
> >> Project management has to report the total number of code reviews
> >> completed for a project to our partner. When you look at the group
> >> view it only gives you a count of the pending reviews, no total
> >> count. Obviously in an ideal world there will be better reports some
> >> day, but for now I just need an easy way to get this number when
> >> needed.
>
> > Off the top of my head there are 2 options:
>
> > 1. use the Django manage shell and write simple Python queries
> > 2. access the database directly, e.g. using native sql terminal
> > monitor tools and query the table(s) directly
>
> > I don't have queries for these but it probably wouldn't take long by poking
> > around. The Django tutorials are pretty good if you want to try option #1
> > which requires basic Python skills. Option #2 requires basic SQL skills.
>
> > If you create useful scripts they would be good to post back to the mailing
> > list.
>
> > Chris
>
> Yeah, these options are necessary for now.
>
> Is it the total number of reviews, or review requests?
>
> To get into the Python shell for Review Board, run:
>
> $ rb-site manage /path/to/site shell
>
> Then:
>
> >>> from django.db.models import Count
> >>> from reviewboard.reviews.models import ReviewRequest
> >>>
> >>> # Total number of public review requests to a group (pending and
> closed)
> >>> review_requests = ReviewRequest.objects.to_group("yourgroupname",
> status=None)
> >>> print review_requests.count()
> >>>
> >>> # Total number of public reviews to all review requests in a group
> >>> print
> review_requests.filter(reviews__public=True).aggregate(Count("reviews"))['r
> eviews__count']
>
> I think that should work off-hand. Let me know if there are problems with
> it.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Misaligned Dashboard w/ 1.0.6
After updating to 1.0.6 the dashboard is often misaligned or text is under the wrong columns if you use the pencil to add fields or change the position of the columns. Refreshing the screen will sometimes correct it or sometimes make it worse. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
Re: Misaligned Dashboard w/ 1.0.6
Issue 1582 has been created with screenshot. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1582 Normally I would not have worried about blanking stuff out but we have some "education" issues still with getting some users to actually close out the review when they are done with them. On Mar 31, 1:50 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Might be an issue with the new caching. Will look into it. > > Can you file a bug? Preferably with a screenshot, if you can blur anything > out. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, grimbeaver wrote: > > After updating to 1.0.6 the dashboard is often misaligned or text is > > under the wrong columns if you use the pencil to add fields or change > > the position of the columns. Refreshing the screen will sometimes > > correct it or sometimes make it worse. > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > oups.com> > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: PyLucene installation
I just went though installing PyLucene on a new server. Thought I had it documented how I did it last time but I was missing a few steps. PyLucene is the biggest pain in the &$# to install and I really wish they would use something else. On Apr 23, 1:21 pm, "Titi Ala'ilima" wrote: > In a followup to an old thread from last year (http:// > groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/ > 615b108947474d86?pli=1), I encountered this error while trying to > install PyLucene: > > /usr/bin/python: module jcc has no associated file > > Like the OP, I am new to most things python and lucene. The OP > figured out the issue but then didn't give specifics. I likewise > figured it out eventually, so I figured I'd give a little more info in > case it should help others. It's more accurately a pylucene issue, > but since it happened in the course of installing reviewboard for me > as well, and since this came up at the top of my search even excluding > reviewboard from the criteria, it seemed as good a place as any to > record the info. > > In my case, I'm on CentOS 5.4 64-bit, Python 2.4, OpenJDK 1.6. > setuptools 0.6c11. Looking at the options in the Makefile, I picked > the one that seemed to match the best: > # Linux (Ubuntu 8.10 64-bit, Python 2.5.2, OpenJDK 1.6, setuptools > 0.6c9) > PREFIX_PYTHON=/usr > ANT=ant > PYTHON=$(PREFIX_PYTHON)/bin/python > JCC=$(PYTHON) -m jcc --shared > NUM_FILES=2 > > Well it turns out that the python version impacts the JCC command > significantly. For my version of python, they suggested: > JCC=$(PYTHON) $(PREFIX_PYTHON)/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jcc/ > __init__.py > > But I didn't have my jcc files located there. I had to pay attention > to where the jcc installation placed the files. What I ended up with > was: > JCC=$(PYTHON) $(PREFIX_PYTHON)/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/JCC-2.5.1- > py2.4-linux-x86_64.egg/jcc/__init__.py > > Hope this helps! > > Titi > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: PyLucene installation
A quick search turned up Xapian. Is that what you were thinking about using? I somewhat question the value of the search though. If you know what group the review was opened under and you know who opened the review it's not difficult to find the review. Plus it's not that frequent that you go back and look at an old review. I have my doubts that any of my coworkers even are using it. On Apr 25, 1:08 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > I want to use something else. The problem is, the only good, extensive, > performant search indexing systems are equally hard to install, and many > actually require Lucene under the hood. > > There's a new project for doing search that may be easier to use, and I'm > looking into switching to it (even worked on this for a bit) but it's still > too immature. Hopefully in time we can offer support for things other than > Lucene. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:01 AM, grimbeaver wrote: > > I just went though installing PyLucene on a new server. Thought I had > > it documented how I did it last time but I was missing a few steps. > > PyLucene is the biggest pain in the &$# to install and I really wish > > they would use something else. > > > On Apr 23, 1:21 pm, "Titi Ala'ilima" wrote: > > > In a followup to an old thread from last year (http:// > > > groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/ > > > 615b108947474d86?pli=1), I encountered this error while trying to > > > install PyLucene: > > > > /usr/bin/python: module jcc has no associated file > > > > Like the OP, I am new to most things python and lucene. The OP > > > figured out the issue but then didn't give specifics. I likewise > > > figured it out eventually, so I figured I'd give a little more info in > > > case it should help others. It's more accurately a pylucene issue, > > > but since it happened in the course of installing reviewboard for me > > > as well, and since this came up at the top of my search even excluding > > > reviewboard from the criteria, it seemed as good a place as any to > > > record the info. > > > > In my case, I'm on CentOS 5.4 64-bit, Python 2.4, OpenJDK 1.6. > > > setuptools 0.6c11. Looking at the options in the Makefile, I picked > > > the one that seemed to match the best: > > > # Linux (Ubuntu 8.10 64-bit, Python 2.5.2, OpenJDK 1.6, setuptools > > > 0.6c9) > > > PREFIX_PYTHON=/usr > > > ANT=ant > > > PYTHON=$(PREFIX_PYTHON)/bin/python > > > JCC=$(PYTHON) -m jcc --shared > > > NUM_FILES=2 > > > > Well it turns out that the python version impacts the JCC command > > > significantly. For my version of python, they suggested: > > > JCC=$(PYTHON) $(PREFIX_PYTHON)/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jcc/ > > > __init__.py > > > > But I didn't have my jcc files located there. I had to pay attention > > > to where the jcc installation placed the files. What I ended up with > > > was: > > > JCC=$(PYTHON) $(PREFIX_PYTHON)/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/JCC-2.5.1- > > > py2.4-linux-x86_64.egg/jcc/__init__.py > > > > Hope this helps! > > > > Titi > > > > -- > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// > >www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > oups.com> > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > oups.com> > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: AD Settings in RB
You might be able to do it by setting the group name or a custom search root in the settings but I'm not real familiar with the AD scheme. Currently I'm just using the Find DC from DNS option. The other thing to remember is that a user is not created in reviewboard until after the user logs in once. This makes assigning privileges kind of difficult. On Apr 29, 2:50 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi, > > I was hoping someone else would respond to this. AD is a > contributor-supplied feature, which I have little personal knowledge of. > > We make use of the Python ldap and DNS modules in order to handle > authentication. I don't know what is needed to support multiple security > groups, whether we need to modify code to allow for it or what. I'd love to > give you a better answer, but this is just outside my area of expertise. I'd > be fine with providing such support in our ActiveDirectory backend if > someone with the ability to test this could provide a patch. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Kunjal wrote: > > Can someone please replay as soon as possible? > > > On Apr 27, 5:42 pm, Kunjal wrote: > > > We have RB 1.0.5.1 installed. > > > We have configured AD settings so all the users can login easily. > > > Now, the issue is that we want to restrict users to only few > > > departments in our company. > > > So, we have created new windows security groups which has nested > > > multiple department names in it. > > > After doing this, the users of this departments can not access RB. > > > If we put one department group then it works. But nesting of > > > departments does not work. > > > Does the RB 1.0.5.1 has ability to put multiple windows security > > > groups for access/authentication? Is nesting possible? > > > > -- > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// > >www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > oups.com> > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > oups.com> > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Finally a PyLucene Package
For anyone interested I just installed an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server and the PyLucene package is finally built with Python 2.6 which means it is finally usable via modpython. No more painful building of PyLucene, just an easy to install package. I just got the system installed and restored a backup so I have not done much testing but so far everything seems to be working fine. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Finally a PyLucene Package
I just got the package through apt-get. Looks like it's 2.3.1 so it's actually a bit dated. But it seems to work. http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/pylucene On Apr 30, 12:35 pm, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 04/30/2010 01:32 PM, grimbeaver wrote: > > > For anyone interested I just installed an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server and > > the PyLucene package is finally built with Python 2.6 which means it > > is finally usable via modpython. No more painful building of > > PyLucene, just an easy to install package. > > > I just got the system installed and restored a backup so I have not > > done much testing but so far everything seems to be working fine. > > A link to the package would be helpful :) > > Also, is it 3.0 (which if I remember correctly is not compatible with > ReviewBoard), or is it an older version? > > (I'm very interested, because I want to put together a Fedora package > for it) > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 1222 - Send e-mails from static address
We really need to reopen this issue as more and more people are going to have problems with this design of sending as the logged in user. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1222 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: rb-site install - "Review Board is taking a nap"
Not sure about what you are seeing in the logs because I did not look at my logs. But I was getting that error when SELinux was enabled. Try turning off SELinux. On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, Eric P wrote: > Hi (me again), > > I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first > Review Board site per the documentation. > > When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' > dialog box. > > In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: > > [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, > interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', > handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error > ... > [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): > [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File > "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1537, > in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, > silent=hlist.silent) > ... > [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a > readonly database > > FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. > > rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ > --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ > --site-root=/ \ > --media-url=/media \ > --db-type=sqlite3 \ > --cache-type=memcached \ > --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ > --web-server-type=apache \ > --python-loader=modpython > > I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a > couple issues. > > Anyway, thanks for reading. > Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Enable Search?
I've just installed on Ubuntu 9.04. Everything is working great, included AD. But I can not get it to allow me to enable search. I've installed the packages for PyLucene and JCC via APT. Anyone know what I might be missing? Where would I look for an error to give me a clue? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Enable Search?
Thanks. That answers what's wrong. The PyLucene package in Ubuntu 9.04 is built against Python 2.5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/ pylucene). But mod_python is built using Python 2.6 (http:// packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libapache2-mod-python). So much for the idea of using Ubuntu 9.04 to avoid manually building PyLucene. Guessing there's no way around this. On Jun 26, 1:39 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi, > > Run python, and type: > > import lucene > > That's basically the entire check we use for search. If that fails, then > PyLucene isn't properly installed. > > Also make sure the version of Python that's being used to run Review Board > matches the version used to install PyLucene. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM, grimbeaver wrote: > > > I've just installed on Ubuntu 9.04. Everything is working great, > > included AD. But I can not get it to allow me to enable search. I've > > installed the packages for PyLucene and JCC via APT. Anyone know what > > I might be missing? Where would I look for an error to give me a clue? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Enable Search?
I removed the packages for PyLucene and JCC. I downloaded and built the source. I can enable search now. However when I try to use it I get an Error 500 and the directory for the index gets created but is empty. Starting to think about giving up on search for now. On Jun 26, 8:03 am, grimbeaver wrote: > Thanks. That answers what's wrong. The PyLucene package in Ubuntu > 9.04 is built against Python 2.5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/ > pylucene). But mod_python is built using Python 2.6 (http:// > packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libapache2-mod-python). So much for the > idea of using Ubuntu 9.04 to avoid manually building PyLucene. > Guessing there's no way around this. > > On Jun 26, 1:39 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Run python, and type: > > > import lucene > > > That's basically the entire check we use for search. If that fails, then > > PyLucene isn't properly installed. > > > Also make sure the version of Python that's being used to run Review Board > > matches the version used to install PyLucene. > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM, grimbeaver wrote: > > > > I've just installed on Ubuntu 9.04. Everything is working great, > > > included AD. But I can not get it to allow me to enable search. I've > > > installed the packages for PyLucene and JCC via APT. Anyone know what > > > I might be missing? Where would I look for an error to give me a clue? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Enable Search?
Seems it's throwing an exception because the search indexes do not
exist. What creates these files? The folder gets created when I
enable search but there are never any files in it. Did I miss a step?
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://10.10.10.97/r/search/
Django Version: 1.0.2 final
Python Version: 2.6.2
Installed Applications:
['django.contrib.admin',
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.markup',
'django.contrib.sites',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'djblets.datagrid',
'djblets.feedview',
'djblets.siteconfig',
'djblets.util',
'djblets.webapi',
'reviewboard.accounts',
'reviewboard.admin',
'reviewboard.changedescs',
'reviewboard.diffviewer',
'reviewboard.iphone',
'reviewboard.reports',
'reviewboard.reviews',
'reviewboard.scmtools',
'reviewboard.webapi',
'django_evolution']
Installed Middleware:
('django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',
'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',
'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware')
Traceback:
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-
py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py" in get_response
86. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
**callback_kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0-py2.6.egg/
reviewboard/reviews/views.py" in search
743. raise e
Exception Type: JavaError at /r/search/
Exception Value: java.io.FileNotFoundException: no segments* file
found in org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory@/tmp/rbsearch_index:
files:
On Jun 26, 3:51 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> If you set DEBUG = True in your site's conf/settings_local.py and restart
> Apache, you should be able to get more debug information for the 500.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:58 AM, grimbeaver wrote:
>
> > I removed the packages for PyLucene and JCC. I downloaded and built
> > the source. I can enable search now. However when I try to use it I
> > get an Error 500 and the directory for the index gets created but is
> > empty. Starting to think about giving up on search for now.
>
> > On Jun 26, 8:03 am, grimbeaver wrote:
> > > Thanks. That answers what's wrong. The PyLucene package in Ubuntu
> > > 9.04 is built against Python 2.5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/
> > > pylucene). But mod_python is built using Python 2.6 (http://
> > > packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libapache2-mod-python). So much for the
> > > idea of using Ubuntu 9.04 to avoid manually building PyLucene.
> > > Guessing there's no way around this.
>
> > > On Jun 26, 1:39 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > Run python, and type:
>
> > > > import lucene
>
> > > > That's basically the entire check we use for search. If that fails,
> > then
> > > > PyLucene isn't properly installed.
>
> > > > Also make sure the version of Python that's being used to run Review
> > Board
> > > > matches the version used to install PyLucene.
>
> > > > Christian
>
> > > > --
> > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM, grimbeaver
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > I've just installed on Ubuntu 9.04. Everything is working great,
> > > > > included AD. But I can not get it to allow me to enable search.
> > I've
> > > > > installed the packages for PyLucene and JCC via APT. Anyone know
> > what
> > > > > I might be missing? Where would I look for an error to give me a
> > clue?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Enable Search?
That did the trick. Thanks.
On Jun 29, 4:15 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> You need to run a command periodically to update the search index, through a
> scheduled task. Specifically:
>
> rb-site manage /path/to/site index -- --full
>
> (Note the "--" in there. It's important.)
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:41 AM, grimbeaver wrote:
>
> > Seems it's throwing an exception because the search indexes do not
> > exist. What creates these files? The folder gets created when I
> > enable search but there are never any files in it. Did I miss a step?
>
> > Environment:
>
> > Request Method: GET
> > Request URL:http://10.10.10.97/r/search/
> > Django Version: 1.0.2 final
> > Python Version: 2.6.2
> > Installed Applications:
> > ['django.contrib.admin',
> > 'django.contrib.auth',
> > 'django.contrib.contenttypes',
> > 'django.contrib.markup',
> > 'django.contrib.sites',
> > 'django.contrib.sessions',
> > 'djblets.datagrid',
> > 'djblets.feedview',
> > 'djblets.siteconfig',
> > 'djblets.util',
> > 'djblets.webapi',
> > 'reviewboard.accounts',
> > 'reviewboard.admin',
> > 'reviewboard.changedescs',
> > 'reviewboard.diffviewer',
> > 'reviewboard.iphone',
> > 'reviewboard.reports',
> > 'reviewboard.reviews',
> > 'reviewboard.scmtools',
> > 'reviewboard.webapi',
> > 'django_evolution']
> > Installed Middleware:
> > ('django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',
> > 'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
> > 'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
> > 'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',
> > 'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
> > 'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
> > 'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
> > 'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
> > 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
> > 'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
> > 'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware')
>
> > Traceback:
> > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-
> > py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py" in get_response
> > 86. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
> > **callback_kwargs)
> > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0-py2.6.egg/
> > reviewboard/reviews/views.py" in search
> > 743. raise e
>
> > Exception Type: JavaError at /r/search/
> > Exception Value: java.io.FileNotFoundException: no segments* file
> > found in org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory@/tmp/rbsearch_index:
> > files:
>
> > On Jun 26, 3:51 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > > If you set DEBUG = True in your site's conf/settings_local.py and restart
> > > Apache, you should be able to get more debug information for the 500.
>
> > > Christian
>
> > > --
> > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
> > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:58 AM, grimbeaver wrote:
>
> > > > I removed the packages for PyLucene and JCC. I downloaded and built
> > > > the source. I can enable search now. However when I try to use it I
> > > > get an Error 500 and the directory for the index gets created but is
> > > > empty. Starting to think about giving up on search for now.
>
> > > > On Jun 26, 8:03 am, grimbeaver wrote:
> > > > > Thanks. That answers what's wrong. The PyLucene package in Ubuntu
> > > > > 9.04 is built against Python 2.5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/
> > > > > pylucene). But mod_python is built using Python 2.6 (http://
> > > > > packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libapache2-mod-python). So much for the
> > > > > idea of using Ubuntu 9.04 to avoid manually building PyLucene.
> > > > > Guessing there's no way around this.
>
> > > > > On Jun 26, 1:39 am, Christian Hamm
hardware requirements
We're looking to deploy Review Board for approximately 60 developers for post-commit svn reviews. I wanted to get some input from the community on hardware and distro since there is not much published for requirements. We have an ESX server which could be used, however our IT department tends to push the ESX servers beyond their reasonable capacity so I'm leaning towards asking management to buy a physical box. Should I use ESX the distro would probably be Ubuntu 8.04 LTS since 9.04 is not supported. I would be curious to know what others have used in ESX deployments though. If we go with a physical box it will probably be a quad core HP DL160 or DL320 with 2-4 GB of RAM. Is that complete overkill? Also what experience do people have with database growth? Just how much drive space is needed? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: stuck with install/config
Not sure about the apache setup on Ubuntu 8.10. But on Ubuntu 9.10 I had to remove the default site file /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000- default before the site would load. Not sure if that will help you but thought I would throw it out there. On Jul 1, 7:40 am, Jim Priest wrote: > I'm going back through everything this AM - the only thing I can't > find is this reference in my reviewboard.conf > > > ... > SetEvn DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings > ... > > > I've seen that settings file mentioned on other posts - where does > that file live?? > > I guess at this point I'm going to just start over and try again from > scratch and see what happens. > > Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: cmemcache instructions
I noticed this as well. I've opened a documentation bug for it: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1199 On Jun 30, 8:05 am, Jim Priest wrote: > I'm running through the Linux install instructions and got hung up on > cmemcache. > > The instructions mention running make/make install, etc. This no > longer appears to be the case. > > You now run 'python setup.py install' > > I found this to be a useful > site:http://leavingcorporate.com/2008/05/04/installing-cmemcache-on-ubuntu/ > > Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
e-mail notifications from address
I'm sure this has been asked before but I can not seem to find it. Is there any way to set the FROM address the e-mail notificaitons use to a specific address instead of it getting set to the TO address? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: e-mail notifications from address
Yes that is what happens. However it would be nice to have them come from a general address to make them easier to sort out in the inbox. On Jul 15, 4:20 pm, Manny Rodriques wrote: > Hi grimbeaver, > > From my experience the emails should be coming from the person that > perform the update to the review. So, if you made the change to the review > then the email should come from you. If personA made an update, then the > email comes from personA. > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, grimbeaver wrote: > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can not seem to find it. Is > > there any way to set the FROM address the e-mail notificaitons use to > > a specific address instead of it getting set to the TO address? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: e-mail notifications from address
Enhancement opened... http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1222 Come to think of it something like this might help people who's e-mail servers do not like the TO and FROM being identical. On Jul 15, 7:08 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > This can perhaps be done in a future release. I don't recall if there's a > bug filed on this or not, but it would be worth looking and filing. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:25 PM, grimbeaver wrote: > > > Yes that is what happens. However it would be nice to have them come > > from a general address to make them easier to sort out in the inbox. > > > On Jul 15, 4:20 pm, Manny Rodriques wrote: > > > Hi grimbeaver, > > > > From my experience the emails should be coming from the person that > > > perform the update to the review. So, if you made the change to the > > review > > > then the email should come from you. If personA made an update, then the > > > email comes from personA. > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, grimbeaver wrote: > > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can not seem to find it. Is > > > > there any way to set the FROM address the e-mail notificaitons use to > > > > a specific address instead of it getting set to the TO address? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: email not working
I would test smtp via telnet from the review board server. Try sending mail that way. Many companies may restrict use of smtp to certain hosts to avoid it being used for spam. http://www.messagingtalk.org/content/470.html On Jul 20, 3:35 am, chris wrote: > Thanks for your reply Christian > > The mail server concerned is the company's central mail server and it > cooperates well with 'Trac' when trac is configured with no more than > the server's ip:port > > When you say configured correctly do you mean that there is any greater > requirement than smtp on 25 ? > > I have no administration over that server but I do have an exim instance > that I could test against. > > Is there no logging at all of email activity/connections etc within the > RB/django logging subsystems ? > > Thanks and Kind regards, > Chris BAYLEY > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Email Settings
I already asked about this once before. The e-mails always come from the address of the person who performed the action. I've already opened an enhancement request a while ago to have them come from a single static address. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1222 On Aug 28, 2:08 am, dartarrow wrote: > Hey, > > how do i set the FROM email address? > I have exim4 setup on my localhost which send the email from > "webmas...@localhost" > > I would like to change that to something like > reviewbo...@mycompany.com > > Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!
Ok this is really not good, after upgrading to 1.0.2 I get the following error and reviewboard won't load. Someone please help. [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] mod_python (pid=5369, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ServerName: 'reviewboard.xxx.xxx' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] DocumentRoot: '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] URI: '/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Location: '/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Directory: None [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Filename: '/ var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] PathInfo: '' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Traceback (most recent call last): [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\ndefault=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1229, in _process_target\nresult = _execute_target(config, req, object, arg) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1128, in _execute_target\nresult = object(arg) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py", line 228, in handler\nreturn ModPythonHandler()(req) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py", line 191, in __call__\nself.load_middleware () [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/base.py", line 40, in load_middleware\nraise exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured, 'Error importing middleware %s: "%s"' % (mw_module, e) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware reviewboard.admin.middleware: "cannot import name parse_backend_uri" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released
It's taking a nap for me after upgrade. Kind of in panic mode that I'll have ticked off people coming to see me soon. I started a thread here: http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/981a2bdff7e99433# On Sep 16, 9:35 am, roshan pius wrote: > Hi Christian, > I'm having issues upgrading to the latest 1.02 release, when i try upgrading > i get a mesage saying that the latest release ReviewBoard > 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in easy-install.pth is > already installed. I was initially running reviewboard from the svn > checkout, but i had migrated to the normal install about 2 months back, so i > don't know if that history has something to do with this. > > linux-izbn:~ # easy_install -U ReviewBoard > Searching for ReviewBoard > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/downloads/nightlies/ > Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/ > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ > Best match: ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 > Processing ReviewBoard-1.1alpha1.dev_20090916-py2.6.egg > ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in > easy-install.pth > Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin > > Using > /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.1alpha1.dev_20090916-p > y2.6.egg > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/mirror/ > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/nightlies/ > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard > Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard > > Thanks, > Roshan Pius > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > We just put out the 1.0.2 release, which contains many bug fixes that users > > have hit, and improved error logging to help diagnose problems. We strongly > > encourage everyone to upgrade, and if you hit any new page crashes, we'll > > probably ask you to upgrade and send us your log file. > > > There's a brief news post at > >http://review-board.org/news/2009/09/16/review-board-102-released/ > > > Full release notes are up at > >http://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.2/ > > > As always, we're looking to fill out our page of Happy Users ( > >http://review-board.org/users/), so if you use Review Board and can give > > us permission to list you, please let us know! > > > Thanks, > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!
Anyone have any help at all on this? I don't really want to reload the server because of this. I'm using Ubuntu 8.0(4) LTS and have tried getting the latest updates for all the packages. On Sep 16, 10:43 am, grimbeaver wrote: > Ok this is really not good, after upgrading to 1.0.2 I get the > following error and reviewboard won't load. Someone please help. > > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] mod_python > (pid=5369, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', > phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): > Application error > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ServerName: > 'reviewboard.xxx.xxx' > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] DocumentRoot: > '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs' > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] URI: '/' > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Location: '/' > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Directory: > None > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Filename: '/ > var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/' > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] PathInfo: '' > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Traceback > (most recent call last): > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1537, in > HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, > silent=hlist.silent) > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1229, in > _process_target\n result = _execute_target(config, req, object, > arg) > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1128, in > _execute_target\n result = object(arg) > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ > handlers/modpython.py", line 228, in handler\n return > ModPythonHandler()(req) > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ > handlers/modpython.py", line 191, in __call__\n self.load_middleware > () > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ > handlers/base.py", line 40, in load_middleware\n raise > exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured, 'Error importing middleware %s: "%s"' > % (mw_module, e) > [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] > ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware > reviewboard.admin.middleware: "cannot import name parse_backend_uri" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!
Thank you, thank you so much. I removed: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg Then when I ran easy_setup again it downloaded Django 1.1 instead and everything works fine. On Sep 16, 12:31 pm, David Trowbridge wrote: > It looks like maybe Django got installed wrong? Can you remove the egg > directory and try reinstalling it? > > -David > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:02 AM, grimbeaver wrote: > > > Anyone have any help at all on this? I don't really want to reload > > the server because of this. I'm using Ubuntu 8.0(4) LTS and have > > tried getting the latest updates for all the packages. > > > On Sep 16, 10:43 am, grimbeaver wrote: > >> Ok this is really not good, after upgrading to 1.0.2 I get the > >> following error and reviewboard won't load. Someone please help. > > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] mod_python > >> (pid=5369, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', > >> phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): > >> Application error > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ServerName: > >> 'reviewboard.xxx.xxx' > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] DocumentRoot: > >> '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs' > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] URI: '/' > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Location: '/' > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Directory: > >> None > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Filename: '/ > >> var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/' > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] PathInfo: '' > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Traceback > >> (most recent call last): > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > >> lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1537, in > >> HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, > >> silent=hlist.silent) > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > >> lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1229, in > >> _process_target\n result = _execute_target(config, req, object, > >> arg) > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > >> lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1128, in > >> _execute_target\n result = object(arg) > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > >> lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ > >> handlers/modpython.py", line 228, in handler\n return > >> ModPythonHandler()(req) > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > >> lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ > >> handlers/modpython.py", line 191, in __call__\n self.load_middleware > >> () > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File "/usr/ > >> lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ > >> handlers/base.py", line 40, in load_middleware\n raise > >> exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured, 'Error importing middleware %s: "%s"' > >> % (mw_module, e) > >> [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] > >> ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware > >> reviewboard.admin.middleware: "cannot import name parse_backend_uri" --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Can't enable search though PyLucene is installed
I ran into this same problem. Ubuntu 9.04 has a package for PyLucene
but it is built for Python 2.5. Apache uses libapache2-mod-python
built for Python 2.6 so no changes to the path or default python are
going to make any difference. The only way I got it to work was to
manually build PyLucene instead of using the package. Hope this
helps.
-Tom
On Oct 21, 2:34 am, David Resnick wrote:
> Do you have any idea how I can reinstall PyLucene with 2.6? I'm running a
> vanilla installation of Ubuntu 9.04.
>
> There's nothing in the browser JavaScript log. I'm running Firefox 3.5.3.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Switching Python paths will certainly break things if you're switching
> > to a different version of Python. If you're using mod_python with 2.6
> > and using the 2.5 search path, you'll experience a number of issues.
> > Instead, you should reinstall PyLucene with 2.6.
>
> > Did you see anything in your browser's JavaScript debug log? And which
> > browser are you using?
>
> > Christian
>
> > On Tuesday, October 20, 2009, David Resnick wrote:
> > > I got an ImportError when I tried doing imp.find_module("lucene").
> > > I saw that lucene is installed in python2.5 and the default python used
> > was 2.6. So I changed the default python to 2.5 and now the import does
> > work.
>
> > > But after restarting Apache the checkbox is still disabled. How does
> > mod_python choose the installation of python to use?
> > > -David
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Christian Hammond
> > wrote:
> > > Also, can you manually run Python and type:
>
> > > import imp
> > > imp.find_module("lucene")
>
> > > If that throws an exception (an ImportError), then PyLucene isn't set up
> > properly. If it simply returns without any message, then it's installed fine
> > and Review Board is seeing it, so something else is going wrong.
>
> > > Christian
> > > --
> > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:08 AM, David Resnick
> > wrote:
>
> > > Yes.
> > > -David
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Christian Hammond
> > wrote:
>
> > > Did you restart the web server after installing PyLucene?
>
> > > Christian
> > > --
> > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:39 AM, David Resnick
> > wrote:
>
> > > I've installed PyLucene on an Ubuntu server and would like to enable
> > search in Review Board but the check box is disabled.
> > > Any ideas?
> > > Thanks,David
>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > oups.com>
>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
>
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > oups.com>
>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
>
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > oups.com>
>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
>
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > oups.com>
>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
>
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > oups.com>
>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
>
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>
> > --
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > oups.com>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--
Re: Can't enable search though PyLucene is installed
I also went back to the LTS release. The only reason I was
considering 9.04 was because I had hoped not to have to build
PyLucene. FYI I believe 9.04 is the first release that a PyLucene
package has been offered.
On Oct 22, 12:46 pm, Chris Clark wrote:
> David,
>
> Which Ubuntu version did you use? I've not (yet) setup search but I've
> found the LTS (8.10) Server version to be REALLY good for reliable
> config. If you need a reliable, *production* server I wouldn't use
> anything other than LTS. I can't promise LTS will handle Lucene but it
> has the best chance.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> David Resnick wrote:
> > Understood. I'll see about filing that bug.
>
> > Thanks all for your help!
>
> > -David
>
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Christian Hammond
> > mailto:chip...@chipx86.com>> wrote:
>
> > We don't have the time to check every version of every distro to
> > find out these things, so we basically learn about it when someone
> > tells us. I would file a bug against the Ubuntu people on this.
>
> > Christian
>
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com <mailto:chip...@chipx86.com>
>
> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David Resnick > <mailto:abune...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the info, Tom. This is kind of ironic, considering
> > that the main reason I choose Ubuntu was because I didn't want
> > to manually build PyLucene :-). Probably the docs should
> > mention which version of Ubuntu will make the setup least
> > painful.
>
> > -David
>
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:23 PM, grimbeaver
> > mailto:tbrez...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > I ran into this same problem. Ubuntu 9.04 has a package
> > for PyLucene
> > but it is built for Python 2.5. Apache uses
> > libapache2-mod-python
> > built for Python 2.6 so no changes to the path or default
> > python are
> > going to make any difference. The only way I got it to
> > work was to
> > manually build PyLucene instead of using the package.
> > Hope this
> > helps.
>
> > -Tom
>
> > On Oct 21, 2:34 am, David Resnick > <mailto:abune...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > Do you have any idea how I can reinstall PyLucene with
> > 2.6? I'm running a
> > > vanilla installation of Ubuntu 9.04.
>
> > > There's nothing in the browser JavaScript log. I'm
> > running Firefox 3.5.3.
>
> > > Thanks,
> > > David
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Christian Hammond
> > mailto:chip...@chipx86.com>>wrote:
>
> > > > Switching Python paths will certainly break things if
> > you're switching
> > > > to a different version of Python. If you're using
> > mod_python with 2.6
> > > > and using the 2.5 search path, you'll experience a
> > number of issues.
> > > > Instead, you should reinstall PyLucene with 2.6.
>
> > > > Did you see anything in your browser's JavaScript
> > debug log? And which
> > > > browser are you using?
>
> > > > Christian
>
> > > > On Tuesday, October 20, 2009, David Resnick
> > mailto:abune...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > I got an ImportError when I tried doing
> > imp.find_module("lucene").
> > > > > I saw that lucene is installed in python2.5 and the
> > default python used
> > > > was 2.6. So I changed the default python to 2.5 and
> > now the import does
> > > > work.
>
> > > > > But after restarting Apache the checkbox is still
> > disabled. How does
> > > > mod_python choose the installation of python to use?
> > > > > -David
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Christian Hammond
&g
