[GitHub] spark issue #14640: [SPARK-17055] [MLLIB] add groupKFold to CrossValidator

2016-10-31 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14640
  
OK let's close this one for now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #14640: [SPARK-17055] [MLLIB] add groupKFold to CrossValidator

2016-10-30 Thread VinceShieh
Github user VinceShieh commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14640
  
@rdelassus Agree. There are a number of folding methods, so some code 
refractoring should be done if more folding methods are to be supported in the 
future. But for now, I guess we will just align with what we currently have in 
mllib. Thanks for your comments.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #14640: [SPARK-17055] [MLLIB] add groupKFold to CrossValidator

2016-10-28 Thread rdelassus
Github user rdelassus commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14640
  
There is an infinite number of ways to make folds. Until now we had the 
mlutils kfold. You want to add the groupedKfold. But I don't think we should 
add one by one every folding method that can be useful, thus adding (like you 
did) "if my method else if this othermethod [...] else kfold". It would be far 
better to make the folding method independant from the crossvalidator class, 
and pass it as an argument for example.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #14640: [SPARK-17055] [MLLIB] add groupKFold to CrossValidator

2016-09-13 Thread VinceShieh
Github user VinceShieh commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14640
  
@finleyb indeed, thank you for pointing it out. I have put it right and 
added a test to guard this issue. Many thanks. And feel free to let us know if 
you have any problem with this class or any requirement. :)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #14640: [SPARK-17055] [MLLIB] add groupKFold to CrossValidator

2016-09-12 Thread finleyb
Github user finleyb commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14640
  
@VinceShieh I was wondering if require in the groupKFold method of MLUtils 
should be a greater than or equal rather than less than or equal? I was testing 
this branch because I need this functionality for a ML task I am performing and 
I ran into the require. Thanks for implementing this!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org