[GitHub] spark issue #22938: [SPARK-25935][SQL] Prevent null rows from JSON parser

2018-11-15 Thread MaxGekk
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22938
  
@cloud-fan @HyukjinKwon Do you agree with the proposed changes, or there is 
anything which blocks the PR for now?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
**[Test build #98856 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98856/testReport)**
 for PR 23038 at commit 
[`c53ca48`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c53ca48885d14dc6a70412fe27a00c8f71aff561).
 * This patch **fails due to an unknown error code, -9**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
**[Test build #98857 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98857/testReport)**
 for PR 23034 at commit 
[`c542b8d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c542b8d1aed852978f72a8b01ec5c89cc04e682f).
 * This patch **fails due to an unknown error code, -9**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23041: [SPARK-26069][TESTS]Fix flaky test: RpcIntegrationSuite....

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23041
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98860/
Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23041: [SPARK-26069][TESTS]Fix flaky test: RpcIntegrationSuite....

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23041
  
**[Test build #98860 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98860/testReport)**
 for PR 23041 at commit 
[`6bebcb5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6bebcb5e004ed4b434c550d26ed1a922d13e0446).
 * This patch **fails due to an unknown error code, -9**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
**[Test build #98858 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98858/testReport)**
 for PR 23031 at commit 
[`37ebae4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/37ebae4c08f3746d7ce739057e81a8cc9c83e106).
 * This patch **fails due to an unknown error code, -9**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
**[Test build #98855 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98855/testReport)**
 for PR 22974 at commit 
[`ec9b83f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ec9b83f5fa0f91a180ad6af36784f6404ddf2299).
 * This patch **fails due to an unknown error code, -9**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23041: [SPARK-26069][TESTS]Fix flaky test: RpcIntegrationSuite....

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23041
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98857/
Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98858/
Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98856/
Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98855/
Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread ueshin
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
Jenkins, retest this please.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5045/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
**[Test build #98862 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98862/testReport)**
 for PR 23031 at commit 
[`37ebae4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/37ebae4c08f3746d7ce739057e81a8cc9c83e106).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans when de...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035
  
**[Test build #98861 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98861/testReport)**
 for PR 23035 at commit 
[`98d91a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/98d91a323d891b8995791fc991d80cee9c4f7f97).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans ...

2018-11-15 Thread mgaido91
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035#discussion_r233744065
  
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala 
---
@@ -2554,4 +2554,34 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with 
SharedSQLContext {
 
 checkAnswer(swappedDf.filter($"key"($"map") > "a"), Row(2, Map(2 -> 
"b")))
   }
+
+  test("SPARK-26057: attribute deduplication on already analyzed plans") {
+withTempView("cc", "p", "c") {
+  val df1 = Seq(("1-1", "sp", 6)).toDF("id", "layout", "n")
+  df1.createOrReplaceTempView("cc")
+  val df2 = Seq(("sp", 1)).toDF("layout", "ts")
+  df2.createOrReplaceTempView("p")
+  val df3 = Seq(("1-1", "sp", 3)).toDF("id", "layout", "ts")
+  df3.createOrReplaceTempView("c")
+  spark.sql(
+"""
+  |SELECT cc.id, cc.layout, count(*) as m
+  |FROM cc
+  |JOIN p USING(layout)
+  |WHERE EXISTS(
+  |  SELECT 1
+  |  FROM c
+  |  WHERE c.id = cc.id AND c.layout = cc.layout AND c.ts > p.ts)
+  |GROUP BY cc.id, cc.layout
+""".stripMargin).createOrReplaceTempView("pcc")
+  val res = spark.sql(
--- End diff --

yes, I simplified as much as I was able to. I hope now it is fine. Thanks.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread shahidki31
Github user shahidki31 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
retest this please


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans when de...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans when de...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5046/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
**[Test build #98863 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98863/testReport)**
 for PR 23038 at commit 
[`c53ca48`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c53ca48885d14dc6a70412fe27a00c8f71aff561).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread zhengruifeng
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
retest this please


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23042: [SPARK-26070] add rule for implicit type coercion...

2018-11-15 Thread uzadude
GitHub user uzadude opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23042

[SPARK-26070] add rule for implicit type coercion for decimal(x,0)

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding another excpetion rule for a popular case where ID columns are saved 
as decimal(x,0) and are compared with same ID columns in other tables which are 
saved as strings

## How was this patch tested?

added a unit tests and made some manual tests


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/uzadude/spark SPARK-26070-decimal-coercion

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23042.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #23042


commit 5bb97493c5a8d214762f36bbb824d34b6b44a5e2
Author: oraviv 
Date:   2018-11-15T08:13:07Z

add another exception rule for a wide use case in which ID columns are 
saved as decimal(x, 0)




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23042: [SPARK-26070] add rule for implicit type coercion for de...

2018-11-15 Thread uzadude
Github user uzadude commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23042
  
@cloud-fan - could you please take a look?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23042: [SPARK-26070] add rule for implicit type coercion for de...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23042
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23042: [SPARK-26070] add rule for implicit type coercion for de...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23042
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23042: [SPARK-26070] add rule for implicit type coercion for de...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23042
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5047/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
**[Test build #98864 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98864/testReport)**
 for PR 22974 at commit 
[`ec9b83f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ec9b83f5fa0f91a180ad6af36784f6404ddf2299).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
retest this please


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
**[Test build #98865 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98865/testReport)**
 for PR 23034 at commit 
[`c542b8d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c542b8d1aed852978f72a8b01ec5c89cc04e682f).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5048/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23043: [SPARK-26021][SQL] replace minus zero with zero i...

2018-11-15 Thread adoron
GitHub user adoron opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043

[SPARK-26021][SQL] replace minus zero with zero in UnsafeProjection

GROUP BY treats -0.0 and 0.0 as different values which is unlike hive's 
behavior.
In addition current behavior with codegen is unpredictable (see example in 
JIRA ticket).

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

In BoundReference class, in the generated code, replace -0.0 with 0.0 if 
the data type is double or float.

## How was this patch tested?

Added tests

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/adoron/spark 
adoron-spark-26021-replace-minus-zero-with-zero

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #23043


commit ee0ef91a7047d47328efac753e66ec97a91c0e37
Author: Alon Doron 
Date:   2018-11-14T16:18:30Z

replace -0.0 with 0.0 in BoundAttribute
added tests

commit 63b7f59ad44d0876ea6dde02e4204fc0140d0df6
Author: Alon Doron 
Date:   2018-11-14T16:27:24Z

minor remove var type




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23043: [SPARK-26021][SQL] replace minus zero with zero in Unsaf...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23043: [SPARK-26021][SQL] replace minus zero with zero in Unsaf...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23043: [SPARK-26021][SQL] replace minus zero with zero in Unsaf...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23043: [SPARK-26021][SQL] replace minus zero with zero in Unsaf...

2018-11-15 Thread adoron
Github user adoron commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
  
@srowen @gatorsmile  @cloud-fan 


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode for order...

2018-11-15 Thread kiszk
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976
  
gentle ping @rednaxelafx


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23012: [SPARK-26014][R] Deprecate R prior to version 3.4 in Spa...

2018-11-15 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23012
  
Merged to master.

Thanks @felixcheung.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode fo...

2018-11-15 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976#discussion_r233765313
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
 ---
@@ -68,62 +68,55 @@ object GenerateOrdering extends 
CodeGenerator[Seq[SortOrder], Ordering[InternalR
 genComparisons(ctx, ordering)
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Creates the variables for ordering based on the given order.
+   */
+  private def createOrderKeys(
+  ctx: CodegenContext,
+  row: String,
+  ordering: Seq[SortOrder]): Seq[ExprCode] = {
+ctx.INPUT_ROW = row
+// to use INPUT_ROW we must make sure currentVars is null
+ctx.currentVars = null
--- End diff --

nit: we only need one `ctx.currentVars = null`. Maybe move it out of this 
function and put it at previous position. 


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode fo...

2018-11-15 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976#discussion_r233764857
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
 ---
@@ -133,30 +126,26 @@ object GenerateOrdering extends 
CodeGenerator[Seq[SortOrder], Ordering[InternalR
   returnType = "int",
   makeSplitFunction = { body =>
 s"""
-  InternalRow ${ctx.INPUT_ROW} = null;  // Holds current row being 
evaluated.
-  $body
-  return 0;
-"""
+  |$body
+  |return 0;
+""".stripMargin
   },
   foldFunctions = { funCalls =>
 funCalls.zipWithIndex.map { case (funCall, i) =>
   val comp = ctx.freshName("comp")
   s"""
-int $comp = $funCall;
-if ($comp != 0) {
-  return $comp;
-}
-  """
+|int $comp = $funCall;
+|if ($comp != 0) {
+|  return $comp;
+|}
+  """.stripMargin
 }.mkString
   })
 ctx.currentVars = oldCurrentVars
 ctx.INPUT_ROW = oldInputRow
 // make sure INPUT_ROW is declared even if splitExpressions
 // returns an inlined block
--- End diff --

This comment is not invalid and can be removed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23012: [SPARK-26014][R] Deprecate R prior to version 3.4...

2018-11-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23012


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode for order...

2018-11-15 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976
  
Two minor comments. LGTM


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode for order...

2018-11-15 Thread rednaxelafx
Github user rednaxelafx commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976
  
+1 LGTM, thanks for making this improvement!


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode fo...

2018-11-15 Thread rednaxelafx
Github user rednaxelafx commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976#discussion_r233771269
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
 ---
@@ -68,62 +68,55 @@ object GenerateOrdering extends 
CodeGenerator[Seq[SortOrder], Ordering[InternalR
 genComparisons(ctx, ordering)
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Creates the variables for ordering based on the given order.
+   */
+  private def createOrderKeys(
+  ctx: CodegenContext,
+  row: String,
+  ordering: Seq[SortOrder]): Seq[ExprCode] = {
+ctx.INPUT_ROW = row
+// to use INPUT_ROW we must make sure currentVars is null
+ctx.currentVars = null
--- End diff --

I thought about making the same suggestion, but on a second thought it's 
fine to just leave it here as well. The overhead isn't gonna be high, but it's 
nice to see how the `ctx.INPUT_ROW` and `ctx.currentVars` interact in adjacent 
lines.

So I'm okay either way (as-is or with @viirya 's suggestion)


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode fo...

2018-11-15 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976#discussion_r233771918
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
 ---
@@ -68,62 +68,55 @@ object GenerateOrdering extends 
CodeGenerator[Seq[SortOrder], Ordering[InternalR
 genComparisons(ctx, ordering)
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Creates the variables for ordering based on the given order.
+   */
+  private def createOrderKeys(
+  ctx: CodegenContext,
+  row: String,
+  ordering: Seq[SortOrder]): Seq[ExprCode] = {
+ctx.INPUT_ROW = row
+// to use INPUT_ROW we must make sure currentVars is null
+ctx.currentVars = null
--- End diff --

Very agreed. :)


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode for order...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976
  
thanks, merging to master!


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode fo...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976#discussion_r233787377
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
 ---
@@ -133,30 +126,26 @@ object GenerateOrdering extends 
CodeGenerator[Seq[SortOrder], Ordering[InternalR
   returnType = "int",
   makeSplitFunction = { body =>
 s"""
-  InternalRow ${ctx.INPUT_ROW} = null;  // Holds current row being 
evaluated.
-  $body
-  return 0;
-"""
+  |$body
+  |return 0;
+""".stripMargin
   },
   foldFunctions = { funCalls =>
 funCalls.zipWithIndex.map { case (funCall, i) =>
   val comp = ctx.freshName("comp")
   s"""
-int $comp = $funCall;
-if ($comp != 0) {
-  return $comp;
-}
-  """
+|int $comp = $funCall;
+|if ($comp != 0) {
+|  return $comp;
+|}
+  """.stripMargin
 }.mkString
   })
 ctx.currentVars = oldCurrentVars
 ctx.INPUT_ROW = oldInputRow
 // make sure INPUT_ROW is declared even if splitExpressions
 // returns an inlined block
--- End diff --

sorry didn't see this comment when merging. feel free to send a follow-up. 
thanks!


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode fo...

2018-11-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23040: [SPARK-26068][Core]ChunkedByteBufferInputStream should h...

2018-11-15 Thread LinhongLiu
Github user LinhongLiu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23040
  
Problem:
ChunkedByteBuffer has signature `ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks: 
Array[ByteBuffer])`. This means user is allowed to pass any kind of `chunks` to 
it. Then we will face the problem described in 
[JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26068). That's why I submit 
this PR.

But on the other hand:
This is an internal class and Spark safely uses `ChunkedByteBuffer` in 2 
ways:
1. Use `ChunkedByteBuffer(byteBuffer: ByteBuffer)` to pass only one buffer. 
Even if it's an empty one, spark will handle this case correctly.
2. Use `ChunkedByteBufferOutputStream` to create `ChunkedByteBuffer` with 
multiple `chunks`. In this case, empty ByteBuffer will never happen.

As a result, current spark code will never reach the problem as far as we 
won't use `ChunkedByteBuffer(var chunks: Array[ByteBuffer])` directly.

So it's both OK either we fix this or not.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22976: [SPARK-25974][SQL]Optimizes Generates bytecode for order...

2018-11-15 Thread heary-cao
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22976
  
thanks, All 
@cloud-fan, @rednaxelafx, @viirya, @kiszk


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comm...

2018-11-15 Thread heary-cao
GitHub user heary-cao opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044

[SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as we don't use it 
anymore

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

remove invalid comment as we don't use it anymore
More details: #22976 (comment)

## How was this patch tested?

N/A

Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a 
pull request.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/heary-cao/spark followUpOrdering

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #23044


commit 786cd4d3e4c06033203618129de080a8e7d72530
Author: caoxuewen 
Date:   2018-11-15T11:00:39Z

remove invalid comment as we don't use it anymore




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as ...

2018-11-15 Thread heary-cao
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044
  
cc @cloud-fan, @viirya


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23045: [SPARK-26071][SQL] disallow map as map key

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045
  
cc @gatorsmile @dongjoon-hyun @viirya 


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23045: [SPARK-26071][SQL] disallow map as map key

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045

[SPARK-26071][SQL] disallow map as map key

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Due to implementation limitation, currently Spark can't compare or do 
equality check between map types. As a result, map values can't appear in EQUAL 
or comparison expressions, can't be grouping key, etc.

The more important thing is, map loop up needs to do equality check of the 
map key, and thus can't support map as map key when looking up values from a 
map. Thus it's not useful to have map as map key.

This PR proposes to stop users from creating maps using map type as key. 
The list of expressions that are updated: `CreateMap`, `MapFromArrays`, 
`MapFromEntries`, `MapConcat`, `TransformKeys`. I manually checked all the 
places that create `MapType`, and came up with this list.

Note that, maps with map type key still exist, via reading from parquet 
files, converting from scala/java map, etc. This PR is not to completely forbid 
map as map key, but to avoid creating it by Spark itself.

Motivation: when I was trying to fix the duplicate key problem, I found 
it's impossible to do it with map type map key. I think it's reasonable to 
avoid map type map key for builtin functions.

 

## How was this patch tested?

updated test

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark map-key

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #23045


commit 3ff0cd592c52839d0aac739b44cee0cf02e951bc
Author: Wenchen Fan 
Date:   2018-11-15T10:23:58Z

disallow map as map key




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23045: [SPARK-26071][SQL] disallow map as map key

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045
  
**[Test build #98866 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98866/testReport)**
 for PR 23045 at commit 
[`3ff0cd5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3ff0cd592c52839d0aac739b44cee0cf02e951bc).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23045: [SPARK-26071][SQL] disallow map as map key

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5049/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23045: [SPARK-26071][SQL] disallow map as map key

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23045
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23046: [SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use `SQLConf.get.en...

2018-11-15 Thread ueshin
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23046

[SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use `SQLConf.get.enableRadixSort` instead of 
`SparkEnv.get.conf.get(SQLConf.RADIX_SORT_ENABLED)`.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #20393.
We should read the conf `"spark.sql.sort.enableRadixSort"` from `SQLConf` 
instead of `SparkConf`, i.e., use `SQLConf.get.enableRadixSort` instead of 
`SparkEnv.get.conf.get(SQLConf.RADIX_SORT_ENABLED)`, otherwise the config is 
never read.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/ueshin/apache-spark issues/SPARK-23207/conf

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23046.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #23046


commit d8db5f3759b998e3ef5720f56c1a048c1494a1c1
Author: Takuya UESHIN 
Date:   2018-11-15T11:30:13Z

Use `SQLConf.get.enableRadixSort` instead of 
`SparkEnv.get.conf.get(SQLConf.RADIX_SORT_ENABLED)`.




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23046: [SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use `SQLConf.get.enableRad...

2018-11-15 Thread ueshin
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23046
  
cc @jiangxb1987 @cloud-fan 


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23046: [SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use `SQLConf.get.enableRad...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23046
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23046: [SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use `SQLConf.get.enableRad...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23046
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 

https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/5050/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23046: [SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use `SQLConf.get.enableRad...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23046
  
**[Test build #98867 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98867/testReport)**
 for PR 23046 at commit 
[`d8db5f3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d8db5f3759b998e3ef5720f56c1a048c1494a1c1).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans when de...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans when de...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98861/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98862/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
**[Test build #98862 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98862/testReport)**
 for PR 23031 at commit 
[`37ebae4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/37ebae4c08f3746d7ce739057e81a8cc9c83e106).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23031: [SPARK-26060][SQL] Track SparkConf entries and make SET ...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23031
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23042: [SPARK-26070][SQL] add rule for implicit type coe...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23042#discussion_r233816966
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
 ---
@@ -138,6 +138,11 @@ object TypeCoercion {
 case (DateType, TimestampType)
   => if (conf.compareDateTimestampInTimestamp) Some(TimestampType) 
else Some(StringType)
 
+// to support a popular use case of tables using Decimal(X, 0) for 
long IDs instead of strings
+// see SPARK-26070 for more details
+case (n: DecimalType, s: StringType) if n.scale == 0 => 
Some(DecimalType(n.precision, n.scale))
--- End diff --

what if the decimal is (1, 0) and the string is something like `.`?

The string can be anything: a very big integer, a fraction with many digits 
after the dot, etc. I don't think there is a perfect solution, casting to 
double is the best we can do here.

I'd suggest end users to manually do the cast which fits their data best.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans when de...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035
  
thanks, merging to master/2.4!


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23046: [SPARK-23207][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Use `SQLConf.get.enableRad...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23046
  
good catch! LGTM


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comm...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044#discussion_r233819066
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
 ---
@@ -76,8 +76,6 @@ object GenerateOrdering extends 
CodeGenerator[Seq[SortOrder], Ordering[InternalR
   row: String,
   ordering: Seq[SortOrder]): Seq[ExprCode] = {
 ctx.INPUT_ROW = row
-// to use INPUT_ROW we must make sure currentVars is null
-ctx.currentVars = null
--- End diff --

I think the conclusion was to keep it?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23035: [SPARK-26057][SQL] Transform also analyzed plans ...

2018-11-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23035


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as ...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044
  
ok to test


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as ...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044
  
add to whitelist


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comment as ...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044
  
**[Test build #98868 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98868/testReport)**
 for PR 23044 at commit 
[`786cd4d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/786cd4d3e4c06033203618129de080a8e7d72530).


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23040: [SPARK-26068][Core]ChunkedByteBufferInputStream should h...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23040
  
It's good to fix a potential bug, can you add a unit test?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23043: [SPARK-26021][SQL] replace minus zero with zero in Unsaf...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23043
  
This only works for attribute, not literal or intermedia result. Is there a 
better place to fix it?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #22989: [SPARK-25986][Build] Add rules to ban throw Error...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22989#discussion_r233821654
  
--- Diff: 
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/UnsafeAlignedOffset.java ---
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ public static int getSize(Object object, long offset) {
   case 8:
 return (int)Platform.getLong(object, offset);
   default:
+// checkstyle.off: RegexpSinglelineJava
 throw new AssertionError("Illegal UAO_SIZE");
--- End diff --

yea, that's exactly the use case of `IllegalStateException`, which can also 
pass the style check here.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23029: [SPARK-26055][CORE] InterfaceStability annotations shoul...

2018-11-15 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23029
  
thanks, merging to master!


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23029: [SPARK-26055][CORE] InterfaceStability annotation...

2018-11-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23029


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
**[Test build #98864 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98864/testReport)**
 for PR 22974 at commit 
[`ec9b83f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ec9b83f5fa0f91a180ad6af36784f6404ddf2299).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
**[Test build #98863 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98863/testReport)**
 for PR 23038 at commit 
[`c53ca48`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c53ca48885d14dc6a70412fe27a00c8f71aff561).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98863/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/98864/
Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22974: [SPARK-22450][WIP][Core][MLLib][FollowUp] Safely registe...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22974
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23038: [SPARK-25451][CORE][WEBUI]Aggregated metrics table doesn...

2018-11-15 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23038
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23000: [SPARK-26002][SQL] Fix day of year calculation for Julia...

2018-11-15 Thread attilapiros
Github user attilapiros commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23000
  
ping @10110346 @gatorsmile 


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #23044: [SPARK-26073][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] remove invalid comm...

2018-11-15 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23044#discussion_r233827093
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
 ---
@@ -76,8 +76,6 @@ object GenerateOrdering extends 
CodeGenerator[Seq[SortOrder], Ordering[InternalR
   row: String,
   ordering: Seq[SortOrder]): Seq[ExprCode] = {
 ctx.INPUT_ROW = row
-// to use INPUT_ROW we must make sure currentVars is null
-ctx.currentVars = null
--- End diff --

I think so.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #23034: [WIP][SPARK-26035][PYTHON] Break large streaming/tests.p...

2018-11-15 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23034
  
Will go and merge this tomorrow if there's no outstanding issues.

cc @zsxwing and @tdas.



---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



  1   2   3   4   5   >