Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 19:42 -0400, FeRD wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:37 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > Yes we were in the middle of a mass rebuild of packages with the > > new > > > > x264 (0.155) and and x265 (2.8), after rebuilt ffmpeg the problem > > was > > > > fixed. And after that I resubmit audacity-freeworld. > > > > Should I plan to rebuild libopenshot, or have you guys got that > covered? No, only packages that depends on x264-libs and x265-libs, libopenshot just depend on ffmpeg . We have an wiki page to help us (I can update it today or tomorrow), for example the list for x265 [1] , today we had x264 and x265 soname bump (on rawhide) , 2 in 1 like shampoos :) [1] https://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists#only_x265_so_bump Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:37 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Yes we were in the middle of a mass rebuild of packages with the new > x264 (0.155) and and x265 (2.8), after rebuilt ffmpeg the problem was > fixed. And after that I resubmit audacity-freeworld. > > Should I plan to rebuild libopenshot, or have you guys got that covered? ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 08:14 +1000, David Timms wrote: > On 05/10/18 07:20, David Timms wrote: > > On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > > .. > > > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? > > > > > > x264 soname bump > > > > I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since > > their > > release was done last month. > > > > I had build failure on armv7hl, when trying to install ffmpeg- > > devel: > > > > root.log: > > DEBUG util.py:522: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/dnf', > > 'builddep', > > '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root/', > > '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845- > > 40910/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/audacity-freeworld-2.3.0- > > 1.fc30.src.rpm'] > > with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': > > '/builddir', > > 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', > > 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': > > ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'http_proxy': > > 'http://proxy:3128', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'LD_PRELOAD': > > '/tmp/tmp.mock.tx49hobf/$LIB/nosync.so'} and shell False > > DEBUG util.py:439: Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:03 ago on > > Thu > > 04 Oct 2018 01:27:05 PM UTC. > > DEBUG util.py:439: Package zip-3.0-23.fc29.armv7hl is already > > installed, skipping. > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error: > > DEBUG util.py:439: Problem: package ffmpeg-devel-4.0.2- > > 6.fc30.armv7hl > > requires libavutil.so.56, but none of the providers can be > > installed > > DEBUG util.py:439:- conflicting requests > > DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides libx264.so.152 needed by > > ffmpeg-libs-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl > > > > Local rpmbuild (f27) and mock for 27,28,29 all succeeded. > > > > Do I need to give the repo a few days to catch up to the x264 > > change ? > > Or maybe use ffmpeg-compat- instead ? > > I made a resubmit, but looks like Sergio had already started a build > - Yes we were in the middle of a mass rebuild of packages with the new x264 (0.155) and and x265 (2.8), after rebuilt ffmpeg the problem was fixed. And after that I resubmit audacity-freeworld. Thanks ! > which has succeeded in f30. I'm going to make same changes for f29 > now. > > Dave. > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu > sion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf > usion.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On 05/10/18 07:20, David Timms wrote: On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: .. Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? x264 soname bump I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since their release was done last month. I had build failure on armv7hl, when trying to install ffmpeg-devel: root.log: DEBUG util.py:522: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/dnf', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root/', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/audacity-freeworld-2.3.0-1.fc30.src.rpm'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'http_proxy': 'http://proxy:3128', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'LD_PRELOAD': '/tmp/tmp.mock.tx49hobf/$LIB/nosync.so'} and shell False DEBUG util.py:439: Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:03 ago on Thu 04 Oct 2018 01:27:05 PM UTC. DEBUG util.py:439: Package zip-3.0-23.fc29.armv7hl is already installed, skipping. DEBUG util.py:439: Error: DEBUG util.py:439: Problem: package ffmpeg-devel-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl requires libavutil.so.56, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:439: - conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:439: - nothing provides libx264.so.152 needed by ffmpeg-libs-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl Local rpmbuild (f27) and mock for 27,28,29 all succeeded. Do I need to give the repo a few days to catch up to the x264 change ? Or maybe use ffmpeg-compat- instead ? I made a resubmit, but looks like Sergio had already started a build - which has succeeded in f30. I'm going to make same changes for f29 now. Dave. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: .. Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? x264 soname bump I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since their release was done last month. I had build failure on armv7hl, when trying to install ffmpeg-devel: root.log: DEBUG util.py:522: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/dnf', 'builddep', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root/', '/var/lib/mock/f30-free-build-51845-40910/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/audacity-freeworld-2.3.0-1.fc30.src.rpm'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8', 'http_proxy': 'http://proxy:3128', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C', 'LD_PRELOAD': '/tmp/tmp.mock.tx49hobf/$LIB/nosync.so'} and shell False DEBUG util.py:439: Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:03 ago on Thu 04 Oct 2018 01:27:05 PM UTC. DEBUG util.py:439: Package zip-3.0-23.fc29.armv7hl is already installed, skipping. DEBUG util.py:439: Error: DEBUG util.py:439: Problem: package ffmpeg-devel-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl requires libavutil.so.56, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:439:- conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides libx264.so.152 needed by ffmpeg-libs-4.0.2-6.fc30.armv7hl DEBUG util.py:577: Child return code was: 1 DEBUG util.py:188: kill orphans Local rpmbuild (f27) and mock for 27,28,29 all succeeded. Do I need to give the repo a few days to catch up to the x264 change ? Or maybe use ffmpeg-compat- instead ? Dave. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 16:02 +, Andrew Bauer wrote: > Should I assume that the upcoming f29 GA is behind why recent builds > this week have not been pushed to testing? The main reason I think was ENOTIME , anyway GA is just on 30: 2018-10-09 Final Freeze (*)2018-10-10 Update of the AppStream data2018-10-23Fedora 29 Final Release (GA) (Preferred target)2018-10-30Fedora 29 Final Release (GA) (Target #1) > > > > > > From: Sérgio Basto > > Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 11:37 PM > > To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list > > Subject: Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ? > > > > > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? > > > As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday > > > the 9th. > > > > > > On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc > > > There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp > > > support. > > > There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. > > > > x264 soname bump > > > > > Thx in advances. > > > > > > -- > > > - > > > > > > Nicolas (kwizart) > > > ___ > > > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-develop...@lists.rpm > fu > > > sion.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rp > mf > > > usion.org > > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu > sion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf > usion.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Should I assume that the upcoming f29 GA is behind why recent builds this week have not been pushed to testing? From: Sérgio Basto Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 11:37 PM To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list Subject: Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ? On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? > As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday > the 9th. > > On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc > There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp > support. > There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. x264 soname bump > Thx in advances. > > -- > - > > Nicolas (kwizart) > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu > sion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf > usion.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? > As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday > the 9th. > > On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc > There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp > support. > There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. x264 soname bump > Thx in advances. > > -- > - > > Nicolas (kwizart) > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu > sion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf > usion.org -- Sérgio M. B. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:13 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > Nvidia is nonfree so use > > > koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-nonfree-override > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 > Duh... Too much cut-n-paste. Thanks, Richard ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Nvidia is nonfree so use koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-nonfree-override xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 22:21, Richard Shaw a écrit : [...] > I tried but it didn't work... > > $ koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-free-override > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 > 2018-10-03 15:16:27,878 [ERROR] koji: TagError: Package > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx not in list for f29-free-override You need to use nonfree -- - Nicolas (kwizart) ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On mercredi 3 octobre 2018 14:55:22 CEST Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not > > responded to my request to finish the review... > > Oops, I didn't catch your message, I'm on it right now. > Thanks for following up! Now, do I need to submit buildroot overrides[1] for the xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx builds so I can build nvidia-390xx-kmod? I tried but it didn't work... $ koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-free-override xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29 2018-10-03 15:16:27,878 [ERROR] koji: TagError: Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx not in list for f29-free-override Thanks, Richard [1] https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Requesting_a_buildroot_override ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On mercredi 3 octobre 2018 14:55:22 CEST Richard Shaw wrote: > I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not > responded to my request to finish the review... > > Thanks, > Richard Oops, I didn't catch your message, I'm on it right now. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not responded to my request to finish the review... Thanks, Richard ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
On 10/3/18 12:47 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday the 9th. On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp support. There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. Thx in advances. I updated to F29 with dnf system-upgrade last weekend and had to fetch vlc from -testing. I just checked and vlc is now in rpmfusion-free, so all is fine. Nothing else to report so far. Thanks everyone for the hard work ! Regards, Xavier ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?
Hi, Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday the 9th. On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should lands armhfp support. There is a need to review the rpmfusion obsoletes package. Thx in advances. -- - Nicolas (kwizart) ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org