Re: [rsyslog] Rsyslog imkafka
The omkafka module was contributed to rsyslog, so the same thing would need to be done for an imkafka module. It's not something that's on Rainers list of things to do. So this needs to be a call for Kafka users to see who would be interested in this. David Lang On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, mostolog--- via rsyslog wrote: Ping! El 20/01/17 a las 15:19, mosto...@gmail.com escribió: Hi. Just started deploying kafka for testing with omkafka. Have anyone considered doing an *imkafka* module? So far, we have: * RELP->rsyslog->omelasticsearch->elasticsearch * RELP->rsyslog->omkafka Otherwise, I'll go for logstash. Regards ___ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
Re: [rsyslog] Rsyslog imkafka
Ping! El 20/01/17 a las 15:19, mosto...@gmail.com escribió: Hi. Just started deploying kafka for testing with omkafka. Have anyone considered doing an *imkafka* module? So far, we have: * RELP->rsyslog->omelasticsearch->elasticsearch * RELP->rsyslog->omkafka Otherwise, I'll go for logstash. Regards ___ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog and fail2ban
That appears to have fixed it. Thank you again for your help. On 1 February 2017 at 09:53, David Lang wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, James wrote: > > Thank you both Jacob and David. I misunderstood the example on >> http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/configuration/filters.html >> >> I was trying to make my filters apply to only the daemon facility level, >> is >> that possible with these legacy filters? I note more complex if-then >> options are available with newer versions of rsyslog. >> > > no, the older style of filters do not allow you to specify multiple > conditions. That requires the if..then style filters (or other features > only available in newer versions) > > David Lang > > ___ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > ___ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.