[sage-combinat-devel] Re: bug in latex for CombinatorialFreeModule in elements in the root lattice

2011-02-25 Thread Christian Stump
> Could you please reconcile this with the patch at #9370?  That implemented a
> latex prefix and various other things. (If you felt like refereeing #9370 at
> the same time, that would be helpful, too.)

Thanks for letting me know. I will fold my patch into yours, if that's
okay for you.

Christian

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.



[sage-combinat-devel] Re: bug in latex for CombinatorialFreeModule in elements in the root lattice

2011-02-25 Thread John H Palmieri


On Friday, February 25, 2011 1:28:06 PM UTC-8, Christian Stump wrote:
>
> > > Is it okay if I open a ticket on that and provide a fix? 
> > 
> > Yes, please fix CombinatorialFreeModule! 
> > > Is there a way to provide a "latex prefix" in addition to the prefix 
> > > for CombinatorialFreeModule in order to get the alpha shown as an 
> > > \alpha?  Should I add this functionality as well? 
>
> here is the patch: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10852


Could you please reconcile this with the patch at #9370?  That implemented a 
latex prefix and various other things. (If you felt like refereeing #9370 at 
the same time, that would be helpful, too.)

-- 
John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.



[sage-combinat-devel] Re: bug in latex for CombinatorialFreeModule in elements in the root lattice

2011-02-25 Thread Christian Stump
> > Is it okay if I open a ticket on that and provide a fix?
>
> Yes, please fix CombinatorialFreeModule!

> > Is there a way to provide a "latex prefix" in addition to the prefix
> > for CombinatorialFreeModule in order to get the alpha shown as an
> > \alpha?  Should I add this functionality as well?

here is the patch: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10852

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.