Re: WSIT Support
From my understanding, I think the question is What's the CXF version used in servicemix? :-) Regards Freeman Bozhong Lin wrote: Just to clarify, I think CXF is used in ServiceMix version 3.2, not version 2.0.2. Regards, Bo On Nov 13, 2007 1:10 PM, Freeman Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes Freeman ArmenH wrote: Thanks, Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2? Freeman Fang wrote: Hi, We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf. And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue, I guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more people can answer your question. Best Regards Freeman ArmenH wrote: It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full interoperability? ArmenH wrote: Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? If not, are there plans to support it? CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT.
Re: WSIT Support
Just to clarify, I think CXF is used in ServiceMix version 3.2, not version 2.0.2. Regards, Bo On Nov 13, 2007 1:10 PM, Freeman Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes > > Freeman > > > ArmenH wrote: > > Thanks, > > > > Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2? > > > > > > Freeman Fang wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf. > >> And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf > >> and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue, I > >> guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more people > >> can answer your question. > >> > >> Best Regards > >> > >> Freeman > >> > >> ArmenH wrote: > >> > >>> It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* > >>> > >>> Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full > >>> interoperability? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ArmenH wrote: > >>> > >>> > Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? > > If not, are there plans to support it? > > CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT. > > > > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > >
[jira] Created: (SM-1136) PreDestroy being called for each exchange when it's not configured that way.
PreDestroy being called for each exchange when it's not configured that way.
Key: SM-1136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1136
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-bean
Affects Versions: 3.2
Reporter: Ryan Bohn
Priority: Critical
I have a sender bean and a receiver bean, both configured using
http://servicemix.apache.org/bean/1.0";
xmlns:example="http://servicemix.apache.org/example";>
The receiver simply implements MessageExchangeListener.
The PostConstruct and PreDestroy only gets called once on the sender
The PostConstruct only gets called once on the receiver
However, the PreDestroy gets called on the receiver for each request.
I noticed in BeanEndpoint, there is the following method:
protected void checkEndOfRequest(Request request, Object corId) {
if (request.getExchange().getStatus() != ExchangeStatus.ACTIVE) {
ReflectionUtils.callLifecycleMethod(request.getBean(),
PreDestroy.class);
//request.setBean(null);
//request.setExchange(null);
requests.remove(corId);
}
}
It doesn't look like this class pays any attention to whether the bean is
supposed to be a single instance of an instance-per-request, which is probably
the cause of the problem.
If you need me to attach an example, please let me know.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: WSIT Support
Yes Freeman ArmenH wrote: Thanks, Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2? Freeman Fang wrote: Hi, We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf. And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue, I guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more people can answer your question. Best Regards Freeman ArmenH wrote: It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full interoperability? ArmenH wrote: Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? If not, are there plans to support it? CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT.
Re: WSIT Support
Thanks, Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2? Freeman Fang wrote: > > Hi, > > We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf. > And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf > and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue, I > guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more people > can answer your question. > > Best Regards > > Freeman > > ArmenH wrote: >> It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* >> >> Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full >> interoperability? >> >> >> >> ArmenH wrote: >> >>> Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? >>> >>> If not, are there plans to support it? >>> >>> CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT. >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WSIT-Support-tf4795567s12049.html#a13719874 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: WSIT Support
Hi, We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf. And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue, I guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more people can answer your question. Best Regards Freeman ArmenH wrote: It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full interoperability? ArmenH wrote: Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? If not, are there plans to support it? CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT.
Re: WSIT Support
It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-* Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full interoperability? ArmenH wrote: > > Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT? > > If not, are there plans to support it? > > CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WSIT-Support-tf4795567s12049.html#a13719462 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jira] Commented: (SM-1103) Class not found (org.apache.camel.Component) while starting servicemix-camel component
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40590 ] David Medinets commented on SM-1103: I am running into this problem while starting ServiceMix from inside Eclipse 3.3. I am using C:\data\support\apache-servicemix-3.3.0.4-fuse as the home for ServiceMix server. Then when I start it from inside of Eclipse, I get the following error. Any suggestions? Starting Apache ServiceMix ESB: 3.3.0.4-fuse Loading Apache ServiceMix from servicemix.xml on the CLASSPATH INFO - ConnectorServerFactoryBean - JMX connector available at: service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi INFO - JBIContainer - ServiceMix 3.3.0.4-fuse JBI Container (ServiceMix) is starting INFO - JBIContainer - For help or more informations please see: http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/ INFO - ComponentMBeanImpl - Initializing component: #SubscriptionManager# INFO - DeploymentService - Restoring service assemblies INFO - JBIContainer - ServiceMix JBI Container (ServiceMix) started INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Archive changed: processing servicemix-bean-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip ... WARN - AutoDeploymentService - Shared libraries servicemix-shared are not installed yet: the componentservicemix-bean installation is suspended and will be resumed once the listed shared libraries are installed INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Finished installation of archive: servicemix-bean-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Archive changed: processing servicemix-bpe-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip ... WARN - AutoDeploymentService - Shared libraries servicemix-shared are not installed yet: the componentservicemix-bpe installation is suspended and will be resumed once the listed shared libraries are installed INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Finished installation of archive: servicemix-bpe-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Archive changed: processing servicemix-camel-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip ... INFO - JDBCAdapterFactory - Database driver recognized: [apache_derby_embedded_jdbc_driver] WARN - AutoDeploymentService - Shared libraries servicemix-shared are not installed yet: the componentservicemix-camel installation is suspended and will be resumed once the listed shared libraries are installed INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Finished installation of archive: servicemix-camel-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Archive changed: processing servicemix-cxf-bc-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip ... INFO - LogTask- Logging system reconfigured using file: file:/C:/data/support/apache-servicemix-3.3.0.4-fuse/conf/log4j.xml WARN - AutoDeploymentService - Shared libraries servicemix-shared are not installed yet: the componentservicemix-cxf-bc installation is suspended and will be resumed once the listed shared libraries are installed INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Finished installation of archive: servicemix-cxf-bc-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Archive changed: processing servicemix-cxf-se-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip ... WARN - AutoDeploymentService - Shared libraries servicemix-shared are not installed yet: the componentservicemix-cxf-se installation is suspended and will be resumed once the listed shared libraries are installed INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Finished installation of archive: servicemix-cxf-se-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Archive changed: processing servicemix-drools-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip ... WARN - AutoDeploymentService - Shared libraries servicemix-shared are not installed yet: the componentservicemix-drools installation is suspended and will be resumed once the listed shared libraries are installed INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Finished installation of archive: servicemix-drools-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Archive changed: processing servicemix-eip-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip ... WARN - AutoDeploymentService - Shared libraries servicemix-shared are not installed yet: the componentservicemix-eip installation is suspended and will be resumed once the listed shared libraries are installed INFO - AutoDeploymentService - Directory: hotdeploy: Finished installation of archive: servicemix-eip-3.3.0.4-fuse-installer.zip INFO - Au
[jira] Created: (SM-1135) Put mandatory osgi entries in the JBI artifacts so that those artifacts can be deployed as bundles
Put mandatory osgi entries in the JBI artifacts so that those artifacts can be deployed as bundles -- Key: SM-1135 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1135 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Improvement Components: tooling Reporter: Guillaume Nodet Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Fix For: 3.3 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (SM-810) Create single complete ServiceMix Shared Library
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-810. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.3 3.2.1 3.1.3 Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Move servicemix-shared-compat in the build. URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=594349&view=rev URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=594350&view=rev URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=594351&view=rev > Create single complete ServiceMix Shared Library > > > Key: SM-810 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-810 > Project: ServiceMix > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: 3.0 > Environment: ServiceMix 3.0 >Reporter: James Lorenzen >Assignee: Guillaume Nodet > Fix For: 3.1.3, 3.2.1, 3.3 > > Original Estimate: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 1 day > > The current ServiceMix Shared Library is insufficient to support proper > portability of existing ServiceMix components to other JBI containers, such > as OpenESB. For example, when installing the ServiceMix HTTP BC in OpenESB, > NoClassDefFoundErrors occur because the installed ServiceMix Shared Library > does not contain all the necessary dependencies. > Therefore it would be a good idea to create a single complete Shared Library. > To accomplish this here are some ideas: > 1) Combine the shared library and shared library compat projects together. > 2) Ensure the new single complete Shared Library contains the following > dependencies: > a) activemq-core > b) backport-util-concurrent > c) commons-logging > d) servicemix-core > e) servicemix-services > f) spring-2.0-rc3 > g) wsdl4j > h) xbean-classloader > i) xbean-kernel > j) xbean-server > k) xbean-spring > When complete the dependencies under /servicemix_home/lib should be smaller. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: ASF Board Report for Nov 2007 is now due
Here is a draft:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/2007-11-14
If I missed something, please edit it asap.
On Nov 12, 2007 11:30 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, we need one as a TLP, not as an incubator project ;-)
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2007 11:22 PM, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 11/12/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The meeting will take place this week at ApacheCon.
> > > I will work on a draft asap.
> >
> > I already submitted a quick note in the ServiceMix report stating that
> > ServiceMix has graduated from the Incubator. However, the MoinMoin
> > wiki config seems to be goofed up somehow.
> >
> > Bruce
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E > );'
> >
> > Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> > Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> > Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> > Castor - http://castor.org/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Wrt to SM-1090 OSGi offline tool
FYI, I've added a class in the offline module, wich is *very ugly* but is used in the JBI integration test to check deployment of JBI artifacts through OSGi. See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/branches/servicemix-4.0/jbi/offline/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/offline/Main.java Btw, I will patch to servicemix 3.3 branch so that the Bundle-Name, Bundle-SymbolicName and Bundle-Version will be automatically added by the jbi maven plugin And I will also patch the 3.2 and maybe 3.1 branch to add the servicemix-shared-compat SL in the build (which will be mandatory for deploying servicemix JBI components into ServiceMix 4.0). -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
