Re: Strange behavior
Thank you, it works. Stemming filter works only with lowercased words? On Feb 12, 2008 4:29 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try putting the stemmer after the lowercase filter. > -Yonik > > On Feb 12, 2008 9:15 AM, Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Please take a look at this strange behavior (connected with stemming I > > suppose): > > > > > > type: > > > > > stored="false"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > field: > > > > stored="false"/> > > > > > > > > I'm adding a document: > > > > 99 > name="name">Apple > > > > > > > > > > Queriyng "name:apple" - 0 results. Searching "name:Apple" - 1 result. > But > > "name:appl*" - 1 result > > > > > > Adding next document: > > > > 8 > name="name">Somenamele > > > > > > > > > > Searching for "name:somenamele" - 1 result, for "name:Somenamele" - 1 > result > > > > > > What is the problem with "Apple" ? Maybe StandardTokenizer understands > it as > > trademark :) ? > > > > > > Thank you in advence > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Traut > > > -- Best regards, Traut
Strange behavior
Hi all Please take a look at this strange behavior (connected with stemming I suppose): type: field: I'm adding a document: 99Apple Queriyng "name:apple" - 0 results. Searching "name:Apple" - 1 result. But "name:appl*" - 1 result Adding next document: 8Somenamele Searching for "name:somenamele" - 1 result, for "name:Somenamele" - 1 result What is the problem with "Apple" ? Maybe StandardTokenizer understands it as trademark :) ? Thank you in advence -- Best regards, Traut
Re: i think it is time to release new solr version
+ 1 Looking forward to get new release version :) On Jan 28, 2008 6:01 AM, j. L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > because lucene 2.3.0 today released.. > > > > -- > regards > j.L > -- Best regards, Traut
Re: PhraseQuery and WildcardQuery
Thank you for the clarification. On Jan 8, 2008 10:43 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : I've got this error when trying to search query like q=+myFiled:"some > : value"* > : > : org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: Query parsing error: Cannot parse > : '+myFiled:"some value"*': '*' or '?' not allowed as first character in > : WildcardQuery >... > > ...this is where the subtleties of the Lucene QueryParser come into place > ... where concepts like "word", "term", and "phrase" all collide. No, you > cannot use wildcards with a quoted phrase query. > > : p.s. unexpected - this query works just fine: q=+myFiled:some\ value* > : so I can just escape all control symbols and space - and I'll get > what > > be carefully ... that's probably not doing what you think it's doing. > it's searching for a documents which contain a single term that starts > with the characters "some value" ... if you indexed with a tokenizer that > splits on whitespace, or does any lowercasing, or does anything > interesting at all in the analyzer, this won't match those docs. > > This is generally true for prefix queries, but people might be confused > and think what they are getting with that syntax is a search for something > matching "some" followed by a prefix query for "value*" ... if you indexed > a doc containg "some the values" with a StopFilter to get rid of "the", > that doc won't match your query. > > I say this jsut to clarify for people who see this thread: that syntax > trick might work fine for you if you know you have a very special case, > but > it probably won't do what many people expect it to. > > : But there are no info about space escaping at > : > http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters > > Hmmm... i'll file bug on that. > > > > > -Hoss > > -- Best regards, Traut
PhraseQuery and WildcardQuery
Hi all I've got this error when trying to search query like q=+myFiled:"some value"* org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: Query parsing error: Cannot parse '+myFiled:"some value"*': '*' or '?' not allowed as first character in WildcardQuery at org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsing.parseQuery(QueryParsing.java:104) at org.apache.solr.request.StandardRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(StandardRequestHandler.java:109) ... Caused by: org.apache.lucene.queryParser.ParseException: Cannot parse '+firstName:"some value"*': '*' or '?' not allowed as first character in WildcardQuery at org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser.parse(QueryParser.java:150) at org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsing.parseQuery(QueryParsing.java:94) ... So is there any way to use wildcard with phrase query? p.s. unexpected - this query works just fine: q=+myFiled:some\ value* so I can just escape all control symbols and space - and I'll get what I want. But there are no info about space escaping at http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters Thank you in advance -- Best regards, Traut
SolrJ "commit" problem
Hi I've got a problem with solrj from nightly build (from 2007-11-12). I have this code: solrClient = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(new URL(indexServerUrl)); and after "add" operation firing solrClient.commit(true, true); But commit operation is not processing in Solr as I can see in log files (but I can see in debug mode that status 200 is returning after executing getHttpConnection().executeMethod(method); in SolrJ client class file) Command from console actually do the trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ curl http://traut-base:/-solr-network/update -H "Content-Type: text/xml" --data-binary '' I must say that I'm trying to use SolrJ client from nightly build with Solr server release 1.2. Most likely it is actually the root of the problem so, can I use Solr release 1.2 with nightly-build SolrJ client? Are there any problems? What can you cay about my "commit" problem? Thank you in advance -- Best regards, Traut
Re: leading wildcards
Seems like there is no way to enable leading wildcard queries except code editing and files repacking. :( On 11/12/07, Bill Au <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The related bug is still open: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-218 > > Bill > > On Nov 12, 2007 10:25 AM, Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > I found the thread about enabling leading wildcards in > > Solr as additional option in config file. I've got nightly Solr build > > and I can't find any options connected with leading wildcards in > > config files. > > > > How I can enable leading wildcard queries in Solr? Thank you > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Traut > > > -- Best regards, Traut
Re: solr workflow ?
rtfm :) http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html On Nov 12, 2007 4:33 PM, Dwarak R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys > > How do we add word documents / pdf / text / etc documents in solr ?. How do > the content of the files are stored or indexed ?. Are these documents stored > as XML in the SOLR filesystem ? > > Regards > > Dwarak R > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, > proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in > error, please notify the sender&[EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately and delete the > original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. > -- Best regards, Traut
leading wildcards
Hi I found the thread about enabling leading wildcards in Solr as additional option in config file. I've got nightly Solr build and I can't find any options connected with leading wildcards in config files. How I can enable leading wildcard queries in Solr? Thank you -- Best regards, Traut
Re: query syntax
So you think my problem is caused by different index/query data analysis? i'll check it. thank you On Nov 6, 2007 6:02 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/6/07, Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have in index document with field "name" and its value is > > "somename123" > > Why I can't find anything with query > > name:somename123* > > This is a prefix query. No analysis is done on the prefix, so it may > not match analysis that was done when the document was indexed. > > For example, if you use WordDelimiterFilter, this may be indexed as > "somename 123" > > > but there are results on query > > name:"somename123*" > > This is not a prefix query. The * will most likely be removed by the > analyzer, leaving you effectively with a query of name:somename123 > > -Yonik > -- Best regards, Traut
query syntax
Hi I have in index document with field "name" and its value is "somename123" Why I can't find anything with query name:somename123* but there are results on query name:"somename123*" As far as I understand first query is just fine. why Solr didn't understand it? I'm using StandardRequestHandler thank you -- Best regards, Traut
Re: can solr do it?
you can implement oscache as additional layer in Solr :) On 9/25/07, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think you can with the current Solr because each instance runs in a > separate web app. > > On 9/25/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > if use multi solr with one index, it will cache individually. > > > > so i think can it share their cache.(they have same config) > > > > -- > > regards > > jl > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Cuong Hoang > -- Best regards, Traut
Re: Search with in search results
Create a second query with IDs from first query? (id:XX id:YY id:ZZ) ? On 4/26/07, Suresh Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How to extend a query type? I need to implement search with in search results without faceted. Suresh -- Best regards, Traut
[question] speed
Hi all I'm working on some presentation for my co-workers about Lucene/Solr index/search process. The question is why lucene (especially Solr) is such a fast engine? Has it something to do with index file formats (http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/fileformats.html)? or is it all about using reverse indexing strategy? I'm have been digging into Lucene/Solr for nearly three month but only as an advanced user so I am not familiar with the details of engine implementation thank you Traut
Re: Solr logo poll
B
Re: failing post-optimize command execution
What about access rights on file snapshooter and on directories in path /home/solr/solr/bin ? Maybe this is the root of the problem? On 3/28/07, galo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've configured my solrconfig.xml to execute a snapshoot after an optimize is made but I keep getting the following exception in the tomcat logs: SEVERE: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "snapshooter" (in directory "/home/solr/solr/bin"): java.io.IOException: error=2, No such file or directory I'm certain the path and filename is correct.. does anybody have problems with this? Cheers, galo -- Best regards, Traut
Re: How to search with special values
It's about an analyzer. Maybe you are using a wrong analyzer which cuts out characters like "/" or even digits. Try to change default analyzer to something different or custom. Cyril Furtado wrote: I am indexing a field called location which is the directory value like /f1/ccde/bpc When I search for /f* it return empty When I search for f* it returns matching values If I search for f1* again it return empty (this happens with number followed by *) If I search for /* it returns empty I am not sure how to search for when '/' is present or if a number is present before the * Can someone please tell me how to search such values? Cyri
Re: Reindex only records that changed
additional field in your DB as flag? 1 - dirty, 0 - clean. Debra wrote: Hi all, This is not a direct solr issue but I need it for indexing. Is there a way to check if a database record changed since the last index (with out using a specail flag field that has to be set any-where the record is updated). I would like to re-index only records that changed. TIA Debra
