Re: [OpenID] OpenID IPR Policy Draft
Again - as the new guy... It gives me a pretty thorough understanding of what's expected. With regards to your Open Issue (2), Since it is from the community perspective would it not be appropriate to have; (obviously my text will require some tweaking ) "When in doubt - Bring to our attention the possibility of a conflict at the earliest time" As a a follow-up question - and I am assuming it is a "legal" question - but does the act of disclosing a conflict / possible conflict have any possible side-effect along the lines of disclosing commercial-in-confidence information etc? >>> "Recordon, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday, December 07, 2006 06:42 >>> Hey guys, Been working with Gabe, and others, on starting to draft an IPR Policy for OpenID specifications. We'd appreciate feedback in terms of if what is written captures the correct intent of the community? We realize the language isn't technically as tight as it needs to be, though first want to make sure it is saying the right thing. It is largely based on the IPR Policy for Microformats. http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/IPR_Policy Thanks, --David ___ general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
Re: [OpenID] Spec Development Process Write-up
David, I don't know if its misrepresenting anything or not (I am pretty green when it comes to the IETF / their processes and creating a specification... But from my "totally new" perspective it reads easily and gives me the basic information I need to know / want to know with regards to what is "official" / what is under consideration and how I contribute / ask questions as required. If there was the complete intention - then I would say it is successfully completing its job. >>> "Recordon, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thursday, December 07, 2006 05:23 >>> Added a section about how specs evolve from creation to being "official". Anything I'm mis-representing? http://openid.net/specs.bml --David ___ general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
RE: OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1
Done, commit 172. --David -Original Message- From: Jonathan Daugherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 1:41 PM To: Recordon, David Cc: specs@openid.net Subject: Re: OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1 # Please review and +1 or -1 for final draft. Only change is adding # namespace parameters to request and response to work as a 2.0 # extension. It also doesn't hurt to have these parameters in 1.1 # messages. +1, but please change my email address in the authors list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, -- Jonathan Daugherty JanRain, Inc. ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
Re: OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1
# Please review and +1 or -1 for final draft. Only change is adding # namespace parameters to request and response to work as a 2.0 # extension. It also doesn't hurt to have these parameters in 1.1 # messages. +1, but please change my email address in the authors list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, -- Jonathan Daugherty JanRain, Inc. ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
OpenID Simple Registration 1.1 - Draft 1
Please review and +1 or -1 for final draft. Only change is adding namespace parameters to request and response to work as a 2.0 extension. It also doesn't hurt to have these parameters in 1.1 messages. Draft: http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-extension-1_1-01.html Diff: http://openid.net/svn/comp.php?repname=specifications&path=&compare%5B%5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]&compare%5B%5D=%2Fsimple_regis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, --David ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
OpenID IPR Policy Draft
Hey guys, Been working with Gabe, and others, on starting to draft an IPR Policy for OpenID specifications. We'd appreciate feedback in terms of if what is written captures the correct intent of the community? We realize the language isn't technically as tight as it needs to be, though first want to make sure it is saying the right thing. It is largely based on the IPR Policy for Microformats. http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/IPR_Policy Thanks, --David ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
Spec Development Process Write-up
Added a section about how specs evolve from creation to being "official". Anything I'm mis-representing? http://openid.net/specs.bml --David ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
