Re: [Standards] Fwd: Minutes 2014-04-23
Did the vote not already fall in favour of accepting rayo-clustering as experimental? I've additionally responded to concerns about the motivation for its standardisation in the thread on that subject, and I feel the argument holds. On 2 May 2014 10:45, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Kevin Smith Date: Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Minutes 2014-04-23 To: XMPP Council On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote: Room logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2014-04-23/ 1) Roll call. Lance, Philipp, Matt, Kev present. Tobias absent. 2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/signing-forms.html Accept as Experimental No objection from Lance. Others have a fortnight to object. Temporarily -1 on the basis that I don't think the preamble with links to opinion pieces on blogs is appropriate. Not objecting to the proposal itself, but I'm not at all convinced that use of this for IBR would be a good idea. 3) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/rayo-clustering.html Accept as Experimental Lance/Philipp to post their objections to the council/standards lists. I'd like my position to count as -1 for the moment, but I might change my mind if a convincing argument is made on-list why clustering should be standardised. /K
[Standards] Fwd: Minutes 2014-04-23
-- Forwarded message -- From: Kevin Smith Date: Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Minutes 2014-04-23 To: XMPP Council On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote: Room logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2014-04-23/ 1) Roll call. Lance, Philipp, Matt, Kev present. Tobias absent. 2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/signing-forms.html Accept as Experimental No objection from Lance. Others have a fortnight to object. Temporarily -1 on the basis that I don't think the preamble with links to opinion pieces on blogs is appropriate. Not objecting to the proposal itself, but I'm not at all convinced that use of this for IBR would be a good idea. 3) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/rayo-clustering.html Accept as Experimental Lance/Philipp to post their objections to the council/standards lists. I'd like my position to count as -1 for the moment, but I might change my mind if a convincing argument is made on-list why clustering should be standardised. /K
[Standards] Fwd: Minutes 2014-04-23
FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Kevin Smith Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:58 AM Subject: Minutes 2014-04-23 To: XMPP Council Room logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2014-04-23/ 1) Roll call. Lance, Philipp, Matt, Kev present. Tobias absent. 2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/signing-forms.html Accept as Experimental No objection from Lance. Others have a fortnight to object. 3) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/rayo-clustering.html Accept as Experimental Lance/Philipp to post their objections to the council/standards lists. 4) Date of next meeting 2014-04-30 15:00 UTC 5) Any other business Philipp/Peter Waher report that 'stuff is happening' in their UPnP work. Peter Waher starts a discussion on people not understanding routing rules for IQs (see logs) Fini
