Re: [Standards] MAM and MUC archives
On 27 Jul 2015, at 14:38, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > > Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:05:34 +0100 > Kevin Smith wrote: > >> Yes, >> “”” >> 3.2 MUC archives >> >> A MUC service allowing MAM queries for a room MUST expose the MAM >> archive on the room's bare JID “”” > > This is still unclear. It's only said that a service allows MAM queries > for a room, but doesn't say where exactly a query must be sent: to the > service itself or directly to the room. I would like to see this > sentence to be written or an example to be added. I'm not to blame, > just my 2 cents. An example covering MUC seems reasonable enough, thanks. /K
Re: [Standards] MAM and MUC archives
Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:05:34 +0100 Kevin Smith wrote: > Yes, > “”” > 3.2 MUC archives > > A MUC service allowing MAM queries for a room MUST expose the MAM > archive on the room's bare JID “”” This is still unclear. It's only said that a service allows MAM queries for a room, but doesn't say where exactly a query must be sent: to the service itself or directly to the room. I would like to see this sentence to be written or an example to be added. I'm not to blame, just my 2 cents.
Re: [Standards] MAM and MUC archives
Hiya, On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:38, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > > Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:32:48 +0100 > Kevin Smith wrote: > >> To the room. > > Will it be defined in the spec? Because it's not very obvious. Yes, “”” 3.2 MUC archives A MUC service allowing MAM queries for a room MUST expose the MAM archive on the room's bare JID “”” /K
Re: [Standards] MAM and MUC archives
Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:32:48 +0100 Kevin Smith wrote: > To the room. Will it be defined in the spec? Because it's not very obvious.
Re: [Standards] MAM and MUC archives
Hi Mickaël, On 27 Jul 2015, at 12:14, Mickaël Rémond wrote: > I need a few questions to clarify the behaviour of the MAM XEP in the context > of the MUC archives. > > Are we supposed to send the MAM queries to the MUC service or to the room > itself ? To the room. > 2. If we send the query to the room itself. > - I guess it means each room must themselves somewhat advertised the Archive > service. It seems a bit strange as I would expect to have a single service to > talk to for my MUC archives Yes, if you want the archives for a particular room, you’d talk to that room. This isn’t *your* MUC archives, but those of the room - it’ll contain messages while you weren’t in there, etc. For those messages you have personally received from MUCs, you could query your personal archive, if your server stores MUC messages in the archive. > - The filter / with behaviour would still need to be clarified. Does it > really make sense to return only messages send by a given user ? It seems to make sense to me, if you want to see a particular user’s history within the room. I’m not sure that it’s sensibly defined, though. We’ve (Matt and I) got a bunch of pending updates for MAM, I’ll have to see where we are with them. /K
