Re: [Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?
I think it best to get a sense of the activity stack before exploring Sugar core. So play with some activities... look at the source to begin to get a sense of the activity structure, and then either chase down a bug from our bug tracker or try making a change/enhancement of your choosing. -walter On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Sanatan Mishra wrote: > Thank you. > I got the developer environment up and running. > Please explain me step two. > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Walter Bender > wrote: >> >> Step Zero: hang out in our IRC channel (irc.freenode.net #sugar) >> Step One: get the developer environment [1] up and running; >> Step Two: Maybe poke around with a few tickets [2] regarding Sugar >> activities to get a feel for the code. >> >> [1] developer.sugarlabs.org >> [2] bugs.sugarlabs.org >> >> regards. >> >> -walter >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Sanatan Mishra >> wrote: >> > Hey, >> > I want to contribute to sugar labs by solving few bugs. >> > I am a beginner so I need guidance for starting the contribution. >> > Please help me by suggesting what should I do and from where to begin. >> > >> > Thanking you, >> > Sanatan Mishra >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > Sugar-devel mailing list >> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Walter Bender >> Sugar Labs >> http://www.sugarlabs.org > > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?
Thank you. I got the developer environment up and running. Please explain me step two. On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > Step Zero: hang out in our IRC channel (irc.freenode.net #sugar) > Step One: get the developer environment [1] up and running; > Step Two: Maybe poke around with a few tickets [2] regarding Sugar > activities to get a feel for the code. > > [1] developer.sugarlabs.org > [2] bugs.sugarlabs.org > > regards. > > -walter > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Sanatan Mishra > wrote: > > Hey, > > I want to contribute to sugar labs by solving few bugs. > > I am a beginner so I need guidance for starting the contribution. > > Please help me by suggesting what should I do and from where to begin. > > > > Thanking you, > > Sanatan Mishra > > > > > > ___ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?
Step Zero: hang out in our IRC channel (irc.freenode.net #sugar) Step One: get the developer environment [1] up and running; Step Two: Maybe poke around with a few tickets [2] regarding Sugar activities to get a feel for the code. [1] developer.sugarlabs.org [2] bugs.sugarlabs.org regards. -walter On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Sanatan Mishra wrote: > Hey, > I want to contribute to sugar labs by solving few bugs. > I am a beginner so I need guidance for starting the contribution. > Please help me by suggesting what should I do and from where to begin. > > Thanking you, > Sanatan Mishra > > > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Reg. how to start contribution?
Hey, I want to contribute to sugar labs by solving few bugs. I am a beginner so I need guidance for starting the contribution. Please help me by suggesting what should I do and from where to begin. Thanking you, Sanatan Mishra ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva > wrote: > > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? > > No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it breaks in > certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes problems the > upstream maintainer won't fix or any number of other reasons. What > ever the reason is it's historical and not documented, I wouldn't > assume malice. It's likely because translations or similar were broken > at the time. I mean we are talking the heady days of Fedora 14 when it > was removed! > > Peter > > > > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva : > >> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. > >> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. > >> I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I > >> aware of any bugs related to it or performance. > >> > >> Please add it back > >> Sebastian Silva > >> http://somosazucar.org/ > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson : > >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > >>> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > > wrote: > > > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. > > > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. > > > > It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously > > working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been > > working for years does it suddenly break. > > > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > Just an observation, mainly from what I learned the past few days, rather than memory. Alice's brain in Speak has mysteriously appeared and disappeared for me in SoaS. I just ran a SoaS Coconut CD, with Speak-29 on it. No functioning brain. However I am guessing at the time I used it last, Speak would have been updated from ASLO, and as a "Stick", the brain would have been functioning. Iain > > That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make > the > activity > work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) > cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. > > I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots > directory, > _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need of > the > bots data, > but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better add > the > bot directory again. > >>> > >>> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the reason. > >>> > >>> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. > >>> > >>> Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote: > Hi All, > > Hate to report that due to dependencies pointed out earlier[1], > sugar-tamtam has been retired from F21[2]. Yes, it can be fixed and re-packaged and then resubmiited but nobody has stepped up to test, make it work and update it from the ancient version that was shipped. I have mixed feeling about this but I personally don't really have the time to deal with it at the moment and it seems most people that care about the activities only care enough if it's them not doing the work. I'd like to be proven wrong though. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it breaks in certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes problems the upstream maintainer won't fix or any number of other reasons. What ever the reason is it's historical and not documented, I wouldn't assume malice. It's likely because translations or similar were broken at the time. I mean we are talking the heady days of Fedora 14 when it was removed! Peter > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva : >> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. >> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. >> I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I >> aware of any bugs related to it or performance. >> >> Please add it back >> Sebastian Silva >> http://somosazucar.org/ >> >> >> >> 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson : >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >>> wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > wrote: > > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. > > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. > > It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously > working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been > working for years does it suddenly break. > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make the activity work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots directory, _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need of the bots data, but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better add the bot directory again. >>> >>> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the reason. >>> >>> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. >>> >>> Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
Ahh, sorry, wrong Sebastian! Gonzalo On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution! > Sebastian Silva > http://somosazucar.org/ > > > > 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard : > > Yes, but that is what this patch do, right? > > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Silva < > sebast...@somosazucar.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? > >> Sebastian Silva > >> http://somosazucar.org/ > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva : > >> > I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. > >> > It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. > >> > I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I > >> > aware of any bugs related to it or performance. > >> > > >> > Please add it back > >> > Sebastian Silva > >> > http://somosazucar.org/ > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson : > >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson < > pbrobin...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > >> > >> wrote: > >> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be > deleted. > >> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. > >> > >> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously > >> working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has > been > >> working for years does it suddenly break. > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to > make > >> >>> the > >> >>> activity > >> >>> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) > >> >>> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. > >> >>> > >> >>> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots > >> >>> directory, > >> >>> _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need > >> >>> of the > >> >>> bots data, > >> >>> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better > >> >>> add the > >> >>> bot directory again. > >> >> > >> >> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the > >> >> reason. > >> >> > >> >> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. > >> >> > >> >> Peter > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Gonzalo Odiard > > > > SugarLabs - Software for children learning > -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Software for children learning ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution! Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard : > Yes, but that is what this patch do, right? > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Silva > wrote: >> >> btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? >> Sebastian Silva >> http://somosazucar.org/ >> >> >> >> 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva : >> > I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. >> > It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. >> > I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I >> > aware of any bugs related to it or performance. >> > >> > Please add it back >> > Sebastian Silva >> > http://somosazucar.org/ >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson : >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson >> >>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> >> wrote: >> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. >> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. >> >> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously >> working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been >> working for years does it suddenly break. >> >> >> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make >> >>> the >> >>> activity >> >>> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) >> >>> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. >> >>> >> >>> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots >> >>> directory, >> >>> _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need >> >>> of the >> >>> bots data, >> >>> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better >> >>> add the >> >>> bot directory again. >> >> >> >> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the >> >> reason. >> >> >> >> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. >> >> >> >> Peter > > > > > -- > Gonzalo Odiard > > SugarLabs - Software for children learning ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
Yes, but that is what this patch do, right? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? > Sebastian Silva > http://somosazucar.org/ > > > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva : > > I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. > > It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. > > I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I > > aware of any bugs related to it or performance. > > > > Please add it back > > Sebastian Silva > > http://somosazucar.org/ > > > > > > > > 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson : > >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson > >>> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard < > godi...@sugarlabs.org> > wrote: > > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. > > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. > > It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously > working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been > working for years does it suddenly break. > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > >>> > >>> > >>> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make > the > >>> activity > >>> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) > >>> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. > >>> > >>> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots > directory, > >>> _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need > of the > >>> bots data, > >>> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better > add the > >>> bot directory again. > >> > >> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the > reason. > >> > >> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. > >> > >> Peter > -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Software for children learning ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva : > I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. > It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. > I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I > aware of any bugs related to it or performance. > > Please add it back > Sebastian Silva > http://somosazucar.org/ > > > > 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson : >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson >>> wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been working for years does it suddenly break. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 >>> >>> >>> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make the >>> activity >>> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) >>> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. >>> >>> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots directory, >>> _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need of the >>> bots data, >>> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better add the >>> bot directory again. >> >> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the reason. >> >> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. >> >> Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I aware of any bugs related to it or performance. Please add it back Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson : > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >>> wrote: >>> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. >>> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. >>> >>> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously >>> working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been >>> working for years does it suddenly break. >>> >>> >>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 >> >> >> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make the >> activity >> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) >> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. >> >> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots directory, >> _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need of the >> bots data, >> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better add the >> bot directory again. > > I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the reason. > > Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. > > Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> wrote: >> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. >> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. >> >> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously >> working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been >> working for years does it suddenly break. >> >> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > > > That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make the > activity > work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) > cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. > > I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots directory, > _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need of the > bots data, > but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better add the > bot directory again. I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't remember the reason. Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > wrote: > > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. > > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. > > It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously > working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been > working for years does it suddenly break. > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like was done to make the activity work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this is still needed. I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 removes the bots directory, _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to remove the need of the bots data, but right now, we are not applying that patch, then would be better add the bot directory again. Gonzalo ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-runner not working in f21 Workstation
That's not a fix, it's a work around. I suspect something has changed or broken in Xephyr when used with mesa/3D etc. Peter On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > How to fix this: > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_21#Fix_sugar-runner_in_workstation > > Thanks to pbrobinson (previous comment in this thread and mcatanzaro on > #fedora-desktop Giimpnet irc > > Tom Gilliard > satellit > > > On 11/14/2014 11:32 AM, Sam P. wrote: > > I have the same issue with full screen on fedora 20 with gnome 3.12. > > On Nov 15, 2014 3:16 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: >> >> With more testing it seems to run OK from the command line if you >> specify a resolution eg "sugar-runner --resolution 1024x768" so I'm >> not sure the issue with full screen >> >> Peter >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> wrote: >> > Please copy all the output. >> > >> > Gonzalo >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Thomas Gilliard >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I can do alt+tab and get to stalled terminal or "unknown" no response >> >> or >> >> output on terminal >> >> alt+f2 (Command window) works to reboot. >> >> On reboot into sugar; terminal fails to start. >> >> Log app terminal last 2 lines: >> >> TypeError: argument foreground: Expected Gdk.RGBA, but got >> >> gi.overrides.GFK.Color >> >> Exited with status 1 >> >> >> >> Tom Gilliard >> >> satellit >> >> >> >> On 11/14/2014 1:37 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I seem the same on gnome3 but I don't need to restart, I get a black >> >>> screen but can alt+tab away and kill it. >> >>> >> >>> Peter >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Thomas Gilliard >> >>> >> >>> wrote: >> >> I tested sugar-runner in f21 workstation beta TC2 (bare metal install >> updated) and I get a grey screen but no sugar... >> sugar-runner locks up fedora and seems to require a power cycle to >> escape >> sugar-desktop starts and works fine from gdm login with sugar >> selected. >> >> in xfce and lxde sugar runner works correctly >> >> Tom Gilliard >> satellit on freenode IRC >> >> Possibly due to this bug? >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136581#c5 >> > >> > The GNOME_KEYRING_PID variable was removed in the version of >> > gnome-keyring >> > included with f21: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-keyring-list/2014-March/msg0.html >> >> >> >> [2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Final_TC2_Desktop#Sugar_.28non-blocking.2C_all_arches.29 >> ___ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >>> >> >>> ___ >> >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >> >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Gonzalo Odiard >> > >> > SugarLabs - Software for children learning >> > >> > ___ >> > Sugar-devel mailing list >> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > >> ___ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously working. The question is what does it do, and why when Speak has been working for years does it suddenly break. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > Gonzalo > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Iain Brown Douglas > wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 12:28 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: >> > On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:15 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: >> > > On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> > > > >> > > > The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the >> > > > Speak.activity folder. >> > > > >> > > > I deleted /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/ >> > > > I re-installed Speak by importing speak-48.xo with a USB >> > > > stick. >> > > > Alice is now running complete with brain. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Ok, that confirms the .xo is ok, >> > > > can you uninstall the activity again, and install the activity using >> > > > the rpm? >> > > > The rpm should be named sugar-speak >> > > >> > > Same behaviour after: >> > > >> > > sudo rpm -evv sugar-speak-48* >> > > >> > > then >> > > >> > > rpmbuild --rebuild -vv sugar-speak-48-1.fc21.src.rpm >> > > >> > > Alice: "I don't know what you are talking about" >> > > >> > > Directory bot/ is again missing >> > > from /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/ >> > > >> > Two attachments, >> > >> > >> > 1. "Speak11-Action2_attach" >> > >> > This is the only mention that I found of the folder bot/ in the install >> > logs. >> > >> > >> > I cannot explain the line >> > >> > + rm -rf .0sugar bot >> > >> Until I read sugar-speak.spec - line 32. >> >> Iain >> > >> > 2. I made "SpeakContentReview" in case it throws any light. >> > >> > As I see it the differences are: >> > AUTHORS >> > bot/ >> > po/ >> > *.pyo >> > >> > >> > Environment, hard drive install from Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4.iso >> > >> > Iain >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Gonzalo >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ___ >> > > SoaS mailing list >> > > s...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas >> > >> > ___ >> > Sugar-devel mailing list >> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > > > > -- > Gonzalo Odiard > > SugarLabs - Software for children learning ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
