Re: [pfSense Support] Squidguard Fatal Error
If you don't get an answer your question you could try the squidGuard mailing list? http://www.squidguard.org/mailinglist.html -- Regards, James. http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand Vigesimal, and J others...? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] Squidguard Fatal Error
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote: Dear all, When my system starts i am getting an error message error in squidguard error, When i checked the proxyfilter log i can see an error, Fatal error: Call to undefined function: str_split() in /usr/local/pkg/squidguard.inc on line 1329 what is this? Some kind of problem in the squidguard package, are you on the latest version? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense Support] MHz myth?
I'm familiar with the hardware sizing guide, and I've done a few benchmarks myself, but I'm wondering if a MHz is a MHz when it comes to pf performance, or do things like IPC and cache sizes matter? What about RAM frequencies and latency? Putting encryption and the various pfsense packages aside, can anybody tell me (based on theory and/or experience) what kind of comparative routing throughput I could expect to see from say an Athlon X2, Athlon II X2, Phenom 2, Atom D510, Pentium D, Celeron D, Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, Pentium G6950 and a Core i7, all dual-core and controlling for NIC and core clock differences? db - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] Squidguard Fatal Error
i got a solution from , http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=31171.0 now its working fine On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote: Dear all, When my system starts i am getting an error message error in squidguard error, When i checked the proxyfilter log i can see an error, Fatal error: Call to undefined function: str_split() in /usr/local/pkg/squidguard.inc on line 1329 what is this? Some kind of problem in the squidguard package, are you on the latest version? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org -- Thanks Regards Shali K R Server Administrator Vidya Academy of Science Technology Thrissur,Kerala. Mob:9846303531
Re: [pfSense Support] MHz myth?
Op 18-1-2011 4:32, David Burgess schreef: Putting encryption and the various pfsense packages aside, can anybody tell me (based on theory and/or experience) what kind of comparative routing throughput I could expect to see from say an Athlon X2, Athlon II X2, Phenom 2, Atom D510, Pentium D, Celeron D, Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, Pentium G6950 and a Core i7, all dual-core and controlling for NIC and core clock differences? They are not comparable, a Geode 500Mhz is good for about 70, a 500Mhz PIII was good for about 250, a intel D510 is good for about 400, a C2D (2.13) should be able to do 600-800 depending on motherboard. I now have Core i3 3.2Ghz firewalls, clockspeed rules, not in the absolute sense, but prefer clockspeed over cores. I have no idea how fast these go yet. It has just 6 gig ports so I really don't know what the fastest it can do is. It should easily do gigabit wirespeed. If you can choose between a higher clocked dual core or a lower clocked quad. Take the higher clocked dual core. Regards, Seth - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
