Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
Eric Priou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:30:10 +0200): > Romain has contacted me and I've tested directly from the bin, with > bash… unfortunatly, the bug is there. > This is not a matter of as2ant. oi, sorry then. i see the CDATA takes care of as2ant not handling everything i (or steve) happen to add to swfml. it's a real bug then, affirmed. the rdf namespace is not properly included in the text written to the swf. i'll look into it when time (namespace handling is a bit messed up since we did the meta stuff). as for the FileAttributes problem- reviewing the simple xslt, it should be set automatically if version>=8, hasMetaData will be 1 (true) as soon as the contains a element, and useNetwork can be set with or respectively. -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
> your problem, AFAICS, lies with as2ant. swfml-s syntax within ant > files has to be understood by as2ant and converted to a standalone > file for swfmill to process, and obviously, as2ant doesnt understand > the new tags (yet). As a workaround, use a standalone xml file for > swfmill. No, Dan. Romain has contacted me and I've tested directly from the bin, with bash… unfortunatly, the bug is there. This is not a matter of as2ant. I'll look in your ticket to precise it. Sorry for the inconvenience ;) --- Eric Priou (aka erixtekila) In progress tech blog : http://blog.v-i-a.net/ Oregano XML Socket forum : http://forum.v-i-a.net/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
I'll do the test asap; thanks very much for standalone xml file solution... ;)Cheers,Romain. ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
"Romain Ecarnot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:29:46 +0200): > I open result in ActionScriptViewer and..SWF meta is incorrect, this is > the error message : Hey Romain, your problem, AFAICS, lies with as2ant. swfml-s syntax within ant files has to be understood by as2ant and converted to a standalone file for swfmill to process, and obviously, as2ant doesnt understand the new tags (yet). As a workaround, use a standalone xml file for swfmill. @Steve, i've closed bug submission for the time being in fear of trac-spam. bug reports have to be sent to me, i'll add them there. if circumstances require, i could appoint a "bug manager" to do that :) -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ ___ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Re: [swfmill] 0.2.11-18 meta not work
Hi Romain.
I'll try and look into this over the weekend. Can you please create a
bug on the trac site and attach the files (or a simple test case) you
were working with there so that I can keep track of it? Or send me the
files and I'll take care of it.
Regards,
Steve
On 9/22/06, Romain Ecarnot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After some tests and some mails with Eric ( aka erixtekila ), the new Flash
> 8 meta seems not working properly.
>
> I compile a first swf with the Flash IDE ( v8 ) and open swf result with
> ActionScriptViewer to see content.
> Great...SWF Meta is ok ! ( not surprise ^^ )
>
> Now I compile a swf with OS tools ( as2ant / mtasc / swfmill 0.2.11-18 )
> This is my as2ant task :
> ---
>
> mtasc="${soft.mtasc}"
> classpath="${src.dir}"
> src=" Main.as"
> dest="test.swf"
> version="8"
> wimp="true"
>
> swfmill="${soft.swfmill}">
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> I open result in ActionScriptViewer and..SWF meta is incorrect, this is
> the error message :
> ---
> -- XML parse error
> -- Reference to undeclared namespace prefix : 'rdf'.
> ---
>
>
> Error occured when I try a swf2xml too :
> ---
> -- namespace error : Namespace prefix rdf on RDF is not defined
> --
> -- namespace error : Namespace prefix rdf on Description is not defined
> --
> ---
>
> This is erixtekila point of view :
> ---
> 1. When define seems
> that default one is not overwrite.
>
> 2. rdf syntax seems to not be correct, namespace is not declared
> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
> xmlns:contact="
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact#";>
>
> 3. description is not added at all
> ---
>
> I add a small question ( not a problem ;) ), as meta is in rdf format, can
> we add rdf tag like 'author', 'date', 'publisher', 'Rights managment'... ?
> is it planned ? or is it a serach engine limitation for flash content ?
>
> Cheers,
> Romain
>
>
>
>
> ___
> swfmill mailing list
> swfmill@osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>
>
>
--
Steve Webster
http://dynamicflash.com
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
