Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (DEPRECATED building=funeral hall)
Sep 18, 2020, 16:25 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > On 18/09/2020 02.46, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> building=church is building constructed as a church that now can >> be a place of worship, warehouse, unused or something else but >> retained building structure typical to a church >> >> amenity=place_of_worship is a place where regular worship is conducted >> - it may be in a church, in open area, in former fish market, in building >> constructed >> as a warehouse >> > > Question: is > https://www.google.com/maps/@42.7408471,-73.7805254,132a,35y,69.19h,53.87t/data=!3m1!1e3 > a building=church? AFAIK it was constructed as a "church" (as a place of > worship, anyway), but if you took down the signage and started to use it for > another purpose, there would be no evidence that it ever used to be a place > of worship; the construction *style* is absolutely *not* what is typically > associated with a "church". > I would defer to decisions/interpretations of a local community, but if something like that appeared in Poland I would tag it as building=supermarket (it matches exactly supermarket building, at least from outside). NOTE: I am unfamiliar with this specific type of architectural monstrosity, maybe it should be handled differently. maybe some term can capture this well > Compare with > > https://www.google.com/maps/@42.6822058,-73.840315,35a,35y,225.94h,69.88t/data=!3m1!1e3> > , which still looks almost entirely generic from above, but at least has > *some* features of a "traditional church". > Here building=church makes *some* sort of sense >> Not sure whatever there are building where their structure makes them >> recognizable as funeral halls, but in case where such building exist >> correct tagging is building=funeral_hall (potentially also >> amenity=funerall_hall) >> > > Possibly something like > https://www.google.com/maps/@43.4139398,-84.0322268,53a,35y,89.44h,48.46t/data=!3m1!1e3 > ...? > > Maybe, GSV is too far away to allow remote tag theorethizing. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (DEPRECATED building=funeral hall)
On 18/09/2020 02.46, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: building=church is building constructed as a church that now can be a place of worship, warehouse, unused or something else but retained building structure typical to a church amenity=place_of_worship is a place where regular worship is conducted - it may be in a church, in open area, in former fish market, in building constructed as a warehouse Question: is https://www.google.com/maps/@42.7408471,-73.7805254,132a,35y,69.19h,53.87t/data=!3m1!1e3 a building=church? AFAIK it was constructed as a "church" (as a place of worship, anyway), but if you took down the signage and started to use it for another purpose, there would be no evidence that it ever used to be a place of worship; the construction *style* is absolutely *not* what is typically associated with a "church". Compare with https://www.google.com/maps/@42.6822058,-73.840315,35a,35y,225.94h,69.88t/data=!3m1!1e3, which still looks almost entirely generic from above, but at least has *some* features of a "traditional church". Not sure whatever there are building where their structure makes them recognizable as funeral halls, but in case where such building exist correct tagging is building=funeral_hall (potentially also amenity=funerall_hall) Possibly something like https://www.google.com/maps/@43.4139398,-84.0322268,53a,35y,89.44h,48.46t/data=!3m1!1e3 ...? -- Matthew ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (DEPRECATED building=funeral hall)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=funeral+hall=h_=images=images=images makes clear that at least some funeral halls are distinguishable from building=house This proposal reports that some members of German OSM community think differently, I am not sure why it is enough to make proposal to encourage to change all building=funeral_hall to building=yes "It is therefore proposed to instead use the combination: building=yes amenity=funeral_hall" Even if building is not recognizable specifically as funerall hall and some more generic tag would be fitting (building=hall? building=civic? building=public?) it does not mean that 1) nonspecific building=yes is best 2) there is currently funeral_hall there, so amenity=funeral_hall should not always be added Sep 18, 2020, 08:46 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > building tags and amenity/shop/... tags are for different purposes > > building=church is building constructed as a church that now can > be a place of worship, warehouse, unused or something else but > retained building structure typical to a church > > amenity=place_of_worship is a place where regular worship is conducted > - it may be in a church, in open area, in former fish market, in building > constructed > as a warehouse > > Not sure whatever there are building where their structure makes them > recognizable as funeral halls, but in case where such building exist > correct tagging is building=funeral_hall (potentially also > amenity=funerall_hall) > > Sep 17, 2020, 23:50 by woll...@posteo.de: > >> Dear list, >> >> Please comment on the following proposal: >> >> Tagging: building=funeral_hall >> Definition: DEPRECATED, use building=yes combined with amenity=funeral_hall >> instead >> >> (This is an offshoot from my recent proposal for amenity=funeral_hall, due >> to comments made there.) >> >> Proposal page: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/DEPRECATED_building%3Dfuneral_hall >> Discussion page: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/DEPRECATED_building%3Dfuneral_hall >> >> Thanks! >> >> Vollis >> >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (DEPRECATED building=funeral hall)
building tags and amenity/shop/... tags are for different purposes building=church is building constructed as a church that now can be a place of worship, warehouse, unused or something else but retained building structure typical to a church amenity=place_of_worship is a place where regular worship is conducted - it may be in a church, in open area, in former fish market, in building constructed as a warehouse Not sure whatever there are building where their structure makes them recognizable as funeral halls, but in case where such building exist correct tagging is building=funeral_hall (potentially also amenity=funerall_hall) Sep 17, 2020, 23:50 by woll...@posteo.de: > Dear list, > > Please comment on the following proposal: > > Tagging: building=funeral_hall > Definition: DEPRECATED, use building=yes combined with amenity=funeral_hall > instead > > (This is an offshoot from my recent proposal for amenity=funeral_hall, due to > comments made there.) > > Proposal page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/DEPRECATED_building%3Dfuneral_hall > Discussion page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/DEPRECATED_building%3Dfuneral_hall > > Thanks! > > Vollis > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (DEPRECATED building=funeral hall)
Dear list, Please comment on the following proposal: Tagging: building=funeral_hall Definition: DEPRECATED, use building=yes combined with amenity=funeral_hall instead (This is an offshoot from my recent proposal for amenity=funeral_hall, due to comments made there.) Proposal page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/DEPRECATED_building%3Dfuneral_hall Discussion page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/DEPRECATED_building%3Dfuneral_hall Thanks! Vollis ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging