Re: [OSM-talk] highway=incline
"M∡rtin Koppenhoefer" wrote in message news:aanlktimuklnfhudhvfk1=_nkcnoy9hwh-xk9rrqc_...@mail.gmail.com... 2010/10/8 Gorm E. Johnsen : Any objections to removing highway=incline and highway=incline_steep from Map Features and adding them to depreciated? not at all. remove them, please. I'd rather they were added to 'deprecated' though. -- Steve ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Proposal: winter roads
I was just about to say that at least this winter road [1] is impassable at summer, but then I remembered about the Rinspeed sQuba [2]. [1] http://www.fotosidan.se/gallery/viewpic.htm/379398.htm [2] http://jalopnik.com/356461/rinspeed-squba-bonds-lotus-submarine-made-real Konrad ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] How does one get the default cyclemap rendering amended?
John wrote: > However in Ontario we have paved shoulders which are > tagged "shoulder:access:bicycle=yes", together with > "shoulder:surface=paved" as per the wiki. >From a quick wiki search the shoulder proposal [1] looks to be still in draft, so hasn't even reached the RFC stage. It's not really surprising it isn't rendered. Ed [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shoulder ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] How does one get the default cyclemap rendering amended?
Hi, You can put in requests or bug reports through trac. Details are on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenCycleMap I don't believe anything is done, or planned to be done, with bicycle=designated at the moment. Dave On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:58 PM, john whelan wrote: > If I look at the default map displayed on the web site then select base > layer cycle map I get nice blue lines on roads with cycle lanes, and cycle > paths which is perfect. > > However in Ontario we have paved shoulders which are tagged > "shoulder:access:bicycle=yes", together with "shoulder:surface=paved" as per > the wiki. It would be nice if these could be rendered on the default cycle > map in some way perhaps a dotted blue line? > > I'm not certain if roads that are signed "bicycle=designated" are rendered > in a special way or not. I have a couple locally but sometimes it takes a > bit of time before the rendered tiles reflect the map. > > Thoughts please. > > Many thanks > > Cheerio John > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] How does one get the default cyclemap rendering amended?
If I look at the default map displayed on the web site then select base layer cycle map I get nice blue lines on roads with cycle lanes, and cycle paths which is perfect. However in Ontario we have paved shoulders which are tagged "shoulder:access:bicycle=yes", together with "shoulder:surface=paved" as per the wiki. It would be nice if these could be rendered on the default cycle map in some way perhaps a dotted blue line? I'm not certain if roads that are signed "bicycle=designated" are rendered in a special way or not. I have a couple locally but sometimes it takes a bit of time before the rendered tiles reflect the map. Thoughts please. Many thanks Cheerio John ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Proposal: winter roads
I think that whether a road is passable or impassable is certainly factual information, and no more subjective than whether it is 'residential', 'secondary' or 'track'. If a road is impassable in summer - or more than that, simply does not exist in summer, being just swamp - then this is a fact which should be tagged. -- Ed Avis ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
