Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 141, Issue 25, about OSM

[Daniel Koć]

W dniu 22.05.2016 14:57, St Niklaas napisał(a):


Hi Daniel, nice, but would not it be better to make a simple link to
the OSM pages so that you would not have to maintain a lot of data.


For me it was no brainer to add some basic facts there, once somebody 
has created navigating template for OSM-related projects and tools.


I also don't like redundancy too much, but I guess after 10 years OSM 
deserves more general public exposure. I think over time inner Wiki and 
Wikipedia articles will diverge anyway, because the audience is 
different.



And avoid figures as most used, thats IMHO not a good bases for a
statement.


You could use a different wording - feel free to rephrase it - but this 
is about illustrating real usage of these editors with hard data (see 
the reference link).


--
"Low, low, low..." [M. Kempa]

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 141, Issue 25, about OSM

[St Niklaas]

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 23:00:40 +0200
From: Daniel Koć 
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Wikipedia articles about OSM
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

>I've just created some basic Wikipedia articles about popular OSM
>editors:

Hi Daniel, nice, but would not it be better to make a simple link to the OSM 
pages so that you would not have to maintain a lot of data. And avoid figures 
as most used, thats IMHO not a good bases for a statement.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


--

End of talk Digest, Vol 141, Issue 25
*

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk