Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building
Tenant? As per the message title? 2009/10/26 MP : >> >Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name >> >isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. >> >> >> Perhaps 'name', 'user' and 'owner' in that order? > > Tag 'user' was misused few times by some editors in the past to > contain name of user who made the edit, so I think we should use some > another name of tag to avoid confusion. > > Martin > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building
> >Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name > >isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. > > > Perhaps 'name', 'user' and 'owner' in that order? Tag 'user' was misused few times by some editors in the past to contain name of user who made the edit, so I think we should use some another name of tag to avoid confusion. Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building
Peter Körner mazdermind.de> writes: >Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name >isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. Perhaps 'name', 'user' and 'owner' in that order? -- Ed Avis ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Name, owner, and tenant of building
> > Is there a convention for disentangling these things? > Just tell me how you'd like the tags to be rendered. Maybe, if name isn't given on a building, another tag should be rendered instead. If you tell this we can male a patch to the rendering stylesheet and post it on dev and maybe it will be applied.. Peter ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
