Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete
Looking at Bing images Rue Gérard-Binette certainly has houses built on it on the photo so I strongly suspect it is correctly labelled and has the correct house numbers on. Rue Jean-Louis-Morin is the same I think there are half dozen more in the same bit of Alymer. Cheerio John On 23 February 2011 12:13, Bégin, Daniel wrote: > Bonjour Jonathan, > > NRN (source of Canvec road network) was not supposed to contain any > "planned" street but I understand that some have been included accidentally > in Quebec. Field work might be necessary until the next NRN version is > available and included in Canvec product. > > Daniel > > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Crowe [mailto:jonathan.cr...@gmail.com] > Sent: February 23, 2011 11:45 > To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete > > Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I didn't > have to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to normal as > far as I can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very widespread. > > I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all in all > I think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of the newer > developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of Allumettières); older > streets match up better with the addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat > ghostly to see them where there are no streets. These are things that can be > tweaked manually -- but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. > [1] > > I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost addr:interpolation > ways without confirming on the ground the existence of the street, in case > the imported data includes streets on the drawing boards that have not yet > been built (which I spotted in at least a couple of areas, unless the City > of Gatineau has been busy over the winter). I plan on surveying these > streets in the spring, unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it. > > [1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M- > > Jonathan Crowe > The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps > http://www.maproomblog.com > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete
Bonjour Jonathan, NRN (source of Canvec road network) was not supposed to contain any "planned" street but I understand that some have been included accidentally in Quebec. Field work might be necessary until the next NRN version is available and included in Canvec product. Daniel -Original Message- From: Jonathan Crowe [mailto:jonathan.cr...@gmail.com] Sent: February 23, 2011 11:45 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I didn't have to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to normal as far as I can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very widespread. I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all in all I think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of the newer developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of Allumettières); older streets match up better with the addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat ghostly to see them where there are no streets. These are things that can be tweaked manually -- but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. [1] I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost addr:interpolation ways without confirming on the ground the existence of the street, in case the imported data includes streets on the drawing boards that have not yet been built (which I spotted in at least a couple of areas, unless the City of Gatineau has been busy over the winter). I plan on surveying these streets in the spring, unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it. [1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M- Jonathan Crowe The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps http://www.maproomblog.com ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Revert in Aylmer is complete
Richard, thank you. The reversion is coming up in Mapnik now -- I didn't have to check in an editor after all -- and things look back to normal as far as I can tell. If there are glitches, they can't be very widespread. I notice that the addr:interpolation ways are still there, which all in all I think is a good thing. They can be a little off in some of the newer developments (e.g., around Wilfrid-Lavigne north of Allumettières); older streets match up better with the addr:interpolation ways. And it's somewhat ghostly to see them where there are no streets. These are things that can be tweaked manually -- but still less work than we would otherwise have faced. [1] I'm reluctant to trace in street ways between the ghost addr:interpolation ways without confirming on the ground the existence of the street, in case the imported data includes streets on the drawing boards that have not yet been built (which I spotted in at least a couple of areas, unless the City of Gatineau has been busy over the winter). I plan on surveying these streets in the spring, unless someone else who lives closer beats me to it. [1] http://osm.org/go/cIhDQbn1M- Jonathan Crowe The Map Room: A Weblog About Maps http://www.maproomblog.com ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
