Re: [Talk-us] OSM US Annual General Meeting tonight
You can watch using the YouTube link without a plugin and participate via the IRC channel. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Mike Dupont wrote: > Hi there, > google hang outs dont work on my computer, (debian sid) the plugin just > crashes. > too bad we dont have anything that is free/libre open source to use, > mike > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is a reminder that tonight at 8PM EST (in ~1 hour) we'll be holding > our > > Annual General Meeting for members of OpenStreetMap US. > > > > You'll find the previous announcement with more information here: > > > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-November/012183.html > > > > If you are an active member you'll receive an e-mail with the hangout > link > > shortly before the meeting. > > > > -Ian > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] OSM US Annual General Meeting Tonight
Hi all, This is a reminder that tonight at 8PM EST (in ~50 minutes) we'll be holding our Annual General Meeting for members of OpenStreetMap US. You'll find the previous announcement with more information here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-November/012183.html If you are an active member you'll receive an e-mail with the hangout link shortly before the meeting. -Ian ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] OSM US Annual General Meeting tonight
Hi all, This is a reminder that tonight at 8PM EST (in ~1 hour) we'll be holding our Annual General Meeting for members of OpenStreetMap US. You'll find the previous announcement with more information here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-November/012183.html If you are an active member you'll receive an e-mail with the hangout link shortly before the meeting. -Ian ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] [Imports-us] People ignoring NYC import pause, tasks done outstripping validation
Unfortunately I have an exam here in the next new minutes so I won't be able to attend either, a recording, if possible, would be fantastic! On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > I got word that Eric won't be able to make the meeting. > > Can we record it so that he (or anyone else) can watch it later? > > - Serge > > ___ > Imports-us mailing list > imports...@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us > > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] A new tracing layer for TIGER 2013
Thanks. I'll try to make that clearer in the next revision. Eric On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Between changed and unchanged. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Eric Fischer wrote: > >> Thanks for the report! >> >> Can you be a little more specific about what you want to show more >> contrast: >> >> * Between TIGER roads and iD or JOSM roads? >> * Between TIGER roads and the aerial imagery? >> * Between TIGER roads and railroads? >> * Between different classes of TIGER roads? >> * Something else? >> >> If you have a screenshot of two things that look alike to you and that >> should be distinguishable, that would be a big help. >> >> I don't think the 2012 TIGER layer uses any color at all, unless the >> color was too subtle for me to see too. >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Eric Fischer wrote: >>> There are only a few colors involved: streets are yellow and railroads are blue, and both are a little brighter if they have changed since the 2006 data. Service roads are drawn a little thinner than the rest, following the example of the 2012 TIGER layer. >>> >>> More contrast, please! I can't tell the difference between the colors. >>> The change in colors are too subtle to tell apart. And that's coming from >>> me, I have a JOSM stylesheet that colors maxspeed=* to color the same as >>> JOSM colors GPX for car speeds, and I can tell the difference between 30, >>> 35, 40, and 45 MPH at a glance. >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Talk-us mailing list >>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >>> >>> >> > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] A new tracing layer for TIGER 2013
Between changed and unchanged. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Eric Fischer wrote: > Thanks for the report! > > Can you be a little more specific about what you want to show more > contrast: > > * Between TIGER roads and iD or JOSM roads? > * Between TIGER roads and the aerial imagery? > * Between TIGER roads and railroads? > * Between different classes of TIGER roads? > * Something else? > > If you have a screenshot of two things that look alike to you and that > should be distinguishable, that would be a big help. > > I don't think the 2012 TIGER layer uses any color at all, unless the color > was too subtle for me to see too. > > Eric > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Eric Fischer wrote: >> >>> There are only a few colors involved: streets are yellow and railroads >>> are blue, and both are a little brighter if they have changed since the >>> 2006 data. Service roads are drawn a little thinner than the rest, >>> following the example of the 2012 TIGER layer. >>> >> >> More contrast, please! I can't tell the difference between the colors. >> The change in colors are too subtle to tell apart. And that's coming from >> me, I have a JOSM stylesheet that colors maxspeed=* to color the same as >> JOSM colors GPX for car speeds, and I can tell the difference between 30, >> 35, 40, and 45 MPH at a glance. >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] A new tracing layer for TIGER 2013
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Eric Fischer wrote: > I don't think the 2012 TIGER layer uses any color at all, unless the color > was too subtle for me to see too. > It does not: only white lines and text with a black outline. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] A new tracing layer for TIGER 2013
Thanks for the report! Can you be a little more specific about what you want to show more contrast: * Between TIGER roads and iD or JOSM roads? * Between TIGER roads and the aerial imagery? * Between TIGER roads and railroads? * Between different classes of TIGER roads? * Something else? If you have a screenshot of two things that look alike to you and that should be distinguishable, that would be a big help. I don't think the 2012 TIGER layer uses any color at all, unless the color was too subtle for me to see too. Eric On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Eric Fischer wrote: > >> There are only a few colors involved: streets are yellow and railroads >> are blue, and both are a little brighter if they have changed since the >> 2006 data. Service roads are drawn a little thinner than the rest, >> following the example of the 2012 TIGER layer. >> > > More contrast, please! I can't tell the difference between the colors. > The change in colors are too subtle to tell apart. And that's coming from > me, I have a JOSM stylesheet that colors maxspeed=* to color the same as > JOSM colors GPX for car speeds, and I can tell the difference between 30, > 35, 40, and 45 MPH at a glance. > > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
On 12/9/2013 12:42 AM, James Mast wrote: So, does anybody else agree with me on this subject of "primary overload" in South Carolina? If so, how do we go about fixing this with a reasonable approach? Looking at some of the history of some of the ways, it seems that only one user was doing the "upgrade" from secondary to primary/trunk over the past 4+ months. Disclaimer: I'm not familiar with DOT classifications in general. At first, the user seemed to be knowledgeable about highway classifications for the segments in question. But I agree - now that nearly everything was just changed to primary, it seems to be both less useful and inconsistent with most of the rest of the US. It seems that the intent was to match some other map rendering or road classification which has fewer classification levels. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
2013/12/9 Shawn K. Quinn > Even weirder: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/34.3071/-80.9977 > > is this stretch of SC 34 that goes primary-secondary-primary for no real > reason I can see. > +1, this one should probably be primary. cheers, Martin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013, at 04:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2013/12/9 James Mast > > There is no way almost all of the State Highways in SC can be "primary". > > Just look at almost any other state. None are overloaded with primaries. > > +1, also there are almost no secondary highways which also seems strange. Even weirder: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/34.3071/-80.9977 is this stretch of SC 34 that goes primary-secondary-primary for no real reason I can see. -- Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
2013/12/9 James Mast > There is no way almost all of the State Highways in SC can be "primary". > Just look at almost any other state. None are overloaded with primaries. +1, also there are almost no secondary highways which also seems strange. cheers, Martin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us