Re: Nimda?

[David van Zuijlekom]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Dierk,

On Tuesday, September 25, 2001 at 18:48:39 +0200, Dierk Haasis [DH]
wrote concerning 'Nimda?':

DH> What happened here? I've seen the message some days ago. And here
DH> it comes again ...

I didn't receive this message until today.

- --
Best regards,
 David

** D)inner not ready:  (A)bort (R)etry (P)izza **

[TB! 1.54 Beta/9] [Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2]
 [Running on a Celeron 633@874 256 Mb RAM]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 06
Comment: PGPKeys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_PGP_key

iQA/AwUBO7C4n1K9yf5+yp9NEQKrqgCg3XiHDNCBmhPbJvgqR1UfhCEALdsAniRK
Jsos9bt8ZfRc+rF473A/TNFO
=p9Wn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Nimda?

[Marck D Pearlstone]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Dierk,

On 25 September 2001 at  18:48:39 +0200 (which was 17:48 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to Silviu Cojocaru and made these points:

>> Received: from relay.assist.ro ([194.102.130.2] helo=users.assist.ro)
>> by home.worldless.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2001)
>> id 15lsIT-vw-00
>> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:30:50 +0700

DH> Where has it gone awry, at Silviu's or at DUTAINT?

According to the line above, Silviu's.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user
 ~~~
\ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com /
 \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0  |  www: http://www.silverstones.com /
.
TB! v1.54 Beta/9-14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: GPG Sealed for freshness

iD8DBQE7sLuLOeQkq5KdzaARAtKLAJsEmaGBMAE5vsehJO63jwwjHr6mPwCdF5ct
1bXunIyzQTVUb1o/6wAbi4s=
=Uu/7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Nimda?

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Dierk,

>> Received: from relay.assist.ro ([194.102.130.2] helo=users.assist.ro)
>> by home.worldless.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2001)
>> id 15lsIT-vw-00
>> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:30:50 +0700
>> Received: from dialup11.assist.ro (dialup11.assist.ro [194.102.130.43])
>> by users.assist.ro (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8PDcoU00923
>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:38:51 +0300

DH> What happened here? I've seen the message some days ago. And here it
DH> comes again ...

DH> Where has it gone awry, at Silviu's or at DUTAINT?

Since it's coming from dialup11.assist.ro it seems likely that it's
gone wrong there or at Silviu's.


-- 
Groetjes, Roelof


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TB! crashes on viewing large JPEGs

[Silviu Cojocaru]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sunday, September 23, 2001 at 6:47:46 PM ,
Peter Meyns wrote about "TB! crashes on viewing large JPEGs":

> today I received several large .jpg files
> attached to mails. Upon trying to view them in
> the preview pane TB! is closed for some "illegal
> operation". Here are the details coming with the
> error msg (I'm sorry, it's in German like my
> system...):

This looks like an e-mail for TBBETA :)

- --
Earth first!  We'll strip-mine the other planets later.
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team

iD8DBQE7sKc98WBGNj3ut+0RAmq8AJ49G019F68lYPgghyJykb7i2GYjtACg36Gn
xwOT71WczCEcx8Orzaqg5Ik=
=ZNSE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Nimda?

[Dierk Haasis]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Silviu!

On Friday, September 21, 2001 at 1:29:18 PM you wrote:

> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Flags: 
> Delivered-To: GMX delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 23097 invoked by uid 0); 25 Sep 2001 13:39:29 -
> Received: from home.worldless.net (203.130.233.9)
>   by mx0.gmx.net (mx003-rz3) with SMTP; 25 Sep 2001 13:39:29 -
> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=thebat.dutaint.com)
> by home.worldless.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2001)
> id 15lsIW-w2-00; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:30:52 +0700
> Received: from relay.assist.ro ([194.102.130.2] helo=users.assist.ro)
> by home.worldless.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2001)
> id 15lsIT-vw-00
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:30:50 +0700
> Received: from dialup11.assist.ro (dialup11.assist.ro [194.102.130.43])
> by users.assist.ro (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8PDcoU00923
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:38:51 +0300
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:29:18 +0300
> From: Silviu Cojocaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/8) Personal
> Organization: S.C. Cezarom S.R.L.
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Nimda?
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> List-help: 
> List-unsubscribe: 
> X-ID: The Bat! Advance Technical Discussion List 
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Modified-Forwards: 1A.inbox

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1

> Wednesday, September 19, 2001 at 2:29:05 PM ,
> Marck D Pearlstone wrote about "Nimda?":

>> I think that was a linguistic confusion - protected: yes it is,
>> vulnerable: no it is not.

> Hah right on Marck :)

What happened here? I've seen the message some days ago. And here it
comes again ...

Where has it gone awry, at Silviu's or at DUTAINT?

- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/9 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

When you realize you've made a mistake, take immediate steps to
correct it.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO7CnWfTo1oA8g8dLEQKTxQCcDcTYr+Rk6PtNP1Bjbsq8t7ds1PMAniWG
CzoUTbv/AAME/xnjLVo3XLyj
=NVeS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Nimda?

[Silviu Cojocaru]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Wednesday, September 19, 2001 at 2:29:05 PM ,
Marck D Pearlstone wrote about "Nimda?":

> I think that was a linguistic confusion - protected: yes it is,
> vulnerable: no it is not.

Hah right on Marck :)

- --
"This is Microsoft technical support.  How may I misinform you?"
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team

iD8DBQE7qySP8WBGNj3ut+0RAsTIAKDBF3iGiTKybY8jzOEcQ/ETEYdMJACfeK93
vcZV6MNYBQjrcWneLDbFP1E=
=BdBD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Nimda?

[Silviu Cojocaru]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Wednesday, September 19, 2001 at 2:25:06 PM ,
Douglas Hinds wrote about "Nimda?":

> I assume that none of these are virus related. Is that assumption
> valid?

Yep. It should. Some old dos programs/games used readme.exe's to
make reading of their help files easier since one may have had or
or may not have had a shell program (like NC) equipped with a
viewer .

- --
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team

iD8DBQE7qyQ78WBGNj3ut+0RAt9JAJ4umriW0Vq6PANBp3Cgw3eo0sHJRACg1R3z
oaxt1feOBGjtq2zNpO+T93c=
=jxss
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]