Filmadoras de hombro Sony y Panasonic
USD1450 PANASONIC NV-MD1 Sensor: 3 CCD Sistema: PAL / Formato: Mini DV Monitor: TFT 2.5 pulgadas / Zoom: Optico: 15x Digital: 750x / Accesorios incluidos: Cables AV y USB / Batería / Adaptador-cargador AC / Software USD 2100 SONY HD1000 Sensor: CMOS de 1/2,9 pulg. / Sistema: PAL / Formato: Mini DV / Monitor: TFT 2.5 pulgadas / Zoom: Optico: 18x / Digital: 750x
Re: [PATCH] Fix for kernel crash with udav(4) device
Ok, I tested it with an NFS server, and also tested it with SFTP. The original diff works fine with the original diff. udav(4) uses 1514 bytes for largest values of total_len. //Logan C-x-C-c
Western Union: Geldtransfer best�tigt Ihre Transaktionsnummer (MTCN) lautet : 5875934019
Western Union
Western Union
Review Konto
Sehr geehrte(r) Client ,
vielen Dank, dass Sie den Western Union Money TransferSM-Dienst in
Anspruch nehmen.Ihre Bargeld|berweisung wurde autorisiert, und der
Geldbetrag steht nun zur Abholung durch den Empfdnger bereit.
Nach Ihrer zweiten Online-Transaktion muss Ihre Identitdt gemd_
gesetzlichen Bestimmungen f|r das internationale Bankwesen verifiziert
werden, damit sie weiterhin unseren Online-Service nutzen kvnnen. Rufen
Sie zu diesem Zweck bitte auf westernunion.de lhr Profil auf, |berpr|fen
Sie alle Angaben auf ihre Aktualitdt und starten Sie das
Identifikationsverfahren.
TRANSAKTIONSDATEN:
Ihre Transaktionsnummer (MTCN) lautet : 5875934192 / Auszahlung in
Landeswdhrung = 100,00 EUR
Bitte klicken Sie hier ;
-> !-- if ( window.opener != null ) { window.document.vpasLogo.src =
opener.document.vpasLogo.src; window.document.memberLogo.src =
opener.document.memberLogo.src; window.opener = null; } //-->
Re: ISO-8859-1 character in manpage
Op Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:55:32 +0100 schreef Ingo Schwarze : Anthony J. Bentley wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:37:50PM -0600: $ mandoc -Tlint /usr/src/share/man/man4/udl.4 /usr/src/share/man/man4/udl.4:42:6: ERROR: skipping bad character: ignoring byte Thanks for reporting! Indeed, that character had to be replaced, ... The o with diaeresis should be replaced with the \(:o escape. (See mandoc_char(7).) .. however the German noun "Koenig" does not contain "o diaeresis", but "o umlaut". As this is a common source of confusion even among native Germans, here is my commit message to explain the situation: Using mandoc_char(7) escapes like "K\(:onig" for German umlauts is incorrect. The escape sequence "\(:o" represents "o diaeresis", not "o umlaut". These are two very different phonological phenomena that only happen to be represented by the same diacritic mark. This implies that it was a silly decision to use the same mark, which is arguable. In -Tascii mode, all renderers correctly render "\(:o" (o diaeresis) as plain "o", but that rendering is incorrect for "o umlaut", which must be transliterated to the digraph "oe" in -Tascii. That is not due to incorrect conversion, but due to missing language information. Your phrase "must be" is only true in a pure German-language context, which is not applicable here. In Dutch language for example, when converting to ASCII it would be more correct to remove the diaeresis for German loanwords without adding an 'e', due to different pronunciation rules. Regardless, the Kvnig website http://www.koniggaming.com/ uses both Kvnig and Konig, but not Koenig. There is no mandoc_char(7) escape for "o umlaut", That is no wonder, because Unicode, since version 1.0 has decided not to distinguish between diaeresis and umlaut. See the specification for U+0308 and the Unicode mail list archive. According to your explanation, every single German text on the Internet is encoded "wrong". But there is no alternative[1]. Suck it up and use the diaeresis like everybody[1] else. [1] Yes, the exception is ISO 5426, but that is only used for collating (sorting); it is unlikely that any widely recognized browser will ever support it. -- Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ (Remove the obvious prefix to reply.)
You\'ve successfully unsubscribed from our newsletter.
Hello , You\'ve successfully unsubscribed from our newsletter. Sincerely, Your InTouch Team
Nuevo sitio de autos de alta gama
autosdealtagama Este es un mail legal, libre de virus y contiene informacisn que consideramos de su interis. De acuerdo con la nueva Ley Argentina N0 26.032 http://infoleg.mecon.gov.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/105000-10/107145/ norma.htm la libre distribucisn de este email esta autorizada por tratarse de propssitos de informacisn, sin embargo, si prefiere no continuar recibiendo este newsletter envie un email a: remo...@autosdealtagama.com con el Asunto REMOVER. Prohibida la reproduccisn total o parcial de imagenes y textos. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of autosdealtagama.jpg]
Anyone able to test a st(4) diff?
I noticed that stdetach() doesn't quite do the right thing. The
consequences should only be relevant if you have more than one st(4)
device and detach one while using it or another st(4).
I'd appreciate a quick test that this doesn't break st(4) in any
obvious ways. If you're a particularly savvy user with access to two
or more detachable tape drives, I can provide some more specific tests
for you to run.
Thanks.
Index: st.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/scsi/st.c,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -p st.c
--- st.c24 Dec 2010 02:45:33 - 1.116
+++ st.c17 Mar 2011 23:37:18 -
@@ -369,22 +369,14 @@ stdetach(struct device *self, int flags)
bufq_drain(&st->sc_bufq);
/* Locate the lowest minor number to be detached. */
- mn = STUNIT(self->dv_unit);
+ mn = self->dv_unit << 4;
for (bmaj = 0; bmaj < nblkdev; bmaj++)
- if (bdevsw[bmaj].d_open == stopen) {
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 0, VBLK);
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 1, VBLK);
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 2, VBLK);
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 3, VBLK);
- }
+ if (bdevsw[bmaj].d_open == stopen)
+ vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 15, VBLK);
for (cmaj = 0; cmaj < nchrdev; cmaj++)
if (cdevsw[cmaj].d_open == stopen) {
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 0, VCHR);
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 1, VCHR);
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 2, VCHR);
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 3, VCHR);
- }
+ vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 15, VCHR);
bufq_destroy(&st->sc_bufq);
Re: Anyone able to test a st(4) diff?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 06:47:14PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> I noticed that stdetach() doesn't quite do the right thing. The
> consequences should only be relevant if you have more than one st(4)
> device and detach one while using it or another st(4).
>
> I'd appreciate a quick test that this doesn't break st(4) in any
> obvious ways. If you're a particularly savvy user with access to two
> or more detachable tape drives, I can provide some more specific tests
> for you to run.
>
> Thanks.
And here's one that actually compiles...
Index: st.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/scsi/st.c,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -p st.c
--- st.c24 Dec 2010 02:45:33 - 1.116
+++ st.c18 Mar 2011 02:12:07 -
@@ -369,22 +369,14 @@ stdetach(struct device *self, int flags)
bufq_drain(&st->sc_bufq);
/* Locate the lowest minor number to be detached. */
- mn = STUNIT(self->dv_unit);
+ mn = self->dv_unit << 4;
for (bmaj = 0; bmaj < nblkdev; bmaj++)
- if (bdevsw[bmaj].d_open == stopen) {
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 0, VBLK);
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 1, VBLK);
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 2, VBLK);
- vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 3, VBLK);
- }
+ if (bdevsw[bmaj].d_open == stopen)
+ vdevgone(bmaj, mn, mn + 15, VBLK);
for (cmaj = 0; cmaj < nchrdev; cmaj++)
- if (cdevsw[cmaj].d_open == stopen) {
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 0, VCHR);
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 1, VCHR);
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 2, VCHR);
- vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 3, VCHR);
- }
+ if (cdevsw[cmaj].d_open == stopen)
+ vdevgone(cmaj, mn, mn + 15, VCHR);
bufq_destroy(&st->sc_bufq);
