F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability
Hi, I have the impression that the DVBT-USB stick mentioned in the subject line is not supported by F14. After plugging in, I got an error msg: missing firmware file in /lib/firmware: == Aug 17 16:13:56 localhost kernel: dvb-usb: found a 'AverMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD (A850)' in cold state, will try to load a firmware Aug 17 16:13:56 localhost kernel: dvb-usb: did not find the firmware file. (dvb-usb-af9015.fw) Please see linux/Documentation/dvb/ for more details on firmware-problems. == So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine. So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in = F15 versions? Kind regards -- Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 and GPM
On 08/18/2010 10:47 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote: On 08/17/2010 12:03 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: On 17/08/10 08:25, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, somebody knows when GPM will be available again in F14? You filed a bug, the rest is up to the maintainer\and or upstream I will take care of it today or tomorrow. Thank you. Kind regards -- Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 14 Alpha RC Validation Test Summary
Greetings testers, Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC validation test events, especially for Andre's leading of the events, quite a mount of bugs were identified and fixed until RC4 was posted and finally meets Alpha Release Criteria[1]. As always, here I summarized the test result based on the tests in both test matrices: ** Installation 623067 NEW - Failed to install using an FTP installation resource 623524 NEW - Err during filesystem check after upgrading bootloader 585006 NEW - livecd-creator creates i386 and x86_64 ISOs which are larger than indicated by the ISO header 624971 NEW - Fail to upgrade with preupgrade-1.1.4-1.fc13 621027 NEW - Graphical screen in anaconda shows F-13 623956 NEW - Graphical anaconda failed to display in kvm with xdriver=vesa 621469 MODIFIED - Fail to retrieve repo info using 'repo=nfsiso:' 596985 ON_QA - hang at start of X11 on fresh install from DVD 624414 CLOSED CANTFIX - OOMKILL on VM with 768MB RAM and no swap Desktop 621825 NEW - [abrt] gnome-keyring-2.31.4-2.fc14: g_str_hash: Process /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) To view detailed test results, please refer to the RC results pages[2]. And feel free to discuss if you have any suggestion/idea/criticism on the validation test events. Stay tuned for Beta Candidates! Thanks! Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Alpha_RC_Test_Results -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
rawhide report: 20100818 changes
Compose started at Wed Aug 18 08:15:08 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.4.so()(64bit) PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libvala.so.0 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgladeui-1.so.9()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libvala.so.0()(64bit) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.2-7.fc14.x86_64 requires librest-0.6.so.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10 frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) gedit-vala-0.6.1-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libvala.so.0()(64bit) glib-java-0.2.6-16.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 glib-java-0.2.6-16.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit) gpx-viewer-0.1.2-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit) intellij-idea-9.0.1.94.399-11.fc14.x86_64 requires jna-examples libgconf-java-2.12.4-14.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libgconf-java-2.12.4-14.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libglade-java-2.12.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libgnome-java-2.12.4-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libgtk-java-2.8.7-13.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libgtk-java-2.8.7-13.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libopenvrml-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libopenvrml-gl-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 libvte-java-0.12.1-15.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) matahari-0.0.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libqmf.so.1()(64bit) mine_detector-6.0-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit) mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-4.fc14.noarch requires mingw32(libpng-3.dll) moblin-panel-myzone-0.1.34-2.fc14.i686 requires libsocialweb-client.so.1 moblin-panel-myzone-0.1.34-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libsocialweb-client.so.1()(64bit) moblin-panel-status-0.1.21-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libsocialweb-client.so.1()(64bit) 1:mojito-0.21.7-4.fc13.i686 requires librest-extras-0.6.so.0 1:mojito-0.21.7-4.fc13.i686 requires librest-0.6.so.0 1:mojito-0.21.7-4.fc13.x86_64 requires librest-0.6.so.0()(64bit) 1:mojito-0.21.7-4.fc13.x86_64 requires librest-extras-0.6.so.0()(64bit) openvrml-java-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
Re: F14 alpha RC4: tons of sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping messages?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/17/2010 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:56 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote: I've just did a fresh install of F14alpha RC4 to see if I could reproduce a bug. When checking /var/log/messages a see a ton of these: Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping message Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping message Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping message Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping message Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping message Is this a known problem? Is that before or after applying updates? What does #ausearch -m avc -ts recent show? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxr4C8ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNScQCdFjxUG1bAbQkeMB7mOYBA4EoV R58An23SGUuDVectIwb+k0ylBcNFXYF/ =eNd/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #122: Proventester request for mschwendt
#122: Proventester request for mschwendt --+- Reporter: mschwendt| Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: --+- Changes (by maxamillion): * owner: = maxamillion * status: new = assigned Comment: I am approving your application to the ProvenTesters FAS group, feel free to email me (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org), the mailing list, or join in #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net if there are any questions you might have. -AdamM -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/122#comment:1 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #121: proventester mentor request, thomasj
#121: proventester mentor request, thomasj --+- Reporter: thomasj | Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: --+- Changes (by maxamillion): * owner: = maxamillion * status: new = assigned Comment: I will approve your request to the ProvenTesters FAS group and please feel free to ask any questions you might have on the t...@fedoraproject.org mailing list as well as in #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net I will do my best to be available all hours of the day, but if I am unavailable I'm sure another member of the QA community would be happy to field inquiries. Happy testing!! -AdamM -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/121#comment:1 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #121: proventester mentor request, thomasj
#121: proventester mentor request, thomasj --+- Reporter: thomasj | Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: fixed|Keywords: --+- Changes (by maxamillion): * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/121#comment:2 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #119: Proventester mentor request
#119: Proventester mentor request --+- Reporter: wilmore | Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: --+- Changes (by maxamillion): * owner: = maxamillion * status: new = assigned Comment: Looks like you are off to a great start! I will approve your request to the ProvenTesters FAS group and please feel free to ask any questions you might have on the t...@fedoraproject.org mailing list as well as in #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net I will do my best to be available all hours of the day, but if I am unavailable I'm sure another member of the QA community would be happy to field inquiries. Happy testing!! -AdamM -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/119#comment:1 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #119: Proventester mentor request
#119: Proventester mentor request --+- Reporter: wilmore | Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: fixed|Keywords: --+- Changes (by maxamillion): * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/119#comment:2 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #117: proventester request for petersen (aka juhp)
#117: proventester request for petersen (aka juhp) --+- Reporter: petersen | Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: --+- Changes (by maxamillion): * owner: = maxamillion * status: new = assigned Comment: I would be more than happy to help in your journey to the wild world of Critical Path, if there is anything I can do to assist you please let me know. We are now accepting proven testers candidates. Can you please read the proven tester instructions at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester If you have any questions, please feel free to post them to the t...@fedoraproject.org mailing list or come by #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net and if I am unavailable I am sure someone in the community will be happy to help! Happy Testing! -AdamM -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/117#comment:1 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #113: Proven Tester application / Mentor Request
#113: Proven Tester application / Mentor Request --+- Reporter: dp67 | Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: fixed|Keywords: --+- Changes (by maxamillion): * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/113#comment:3 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Boot time graphics
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:20 -0400, TK009 wrote: Until recently I would see it only rarely being a freedom hater and using the bad nvidia drivers. A. Useless rant / flame. The problem has -nothing- to do with Fedora. B. You can enable it (nvidia binary drivers) by adding vga=xxx to your kernel command line. C. ... If nVidia will -choose- to add KMS support to their binary drivers, vga=xxx will no longer be required. - Gilboa -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test I think you are lost. Yes I knew that and don't care enough to enable it. Just pointing out why I don't see it and therefore never paid it much attention. It was neither a flame or a rant. Calling you asshat would be a flame or a rant. See the difference? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F-14 Branched report: 20100818 changes
Compose started at Wed Aug 18 13:15:15 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0 CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-core-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.4.so()(64bit) PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit) QuantLib-test-1.0.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.41.0()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgladeui-1.so.9()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 avogadro-1.0.1-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_python-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) avogadro-libs-1.0.1-2.fc14.i686 requires libboost_python-mt.so.1.41.0 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_python-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) bastet-0.43-7.fc13.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options.so.1.41.0()(64bit) cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) easystroke-0.5.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) ekg2-python-0.2-0.12.rc1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10 frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) fuse-encfs-1.5-12.fc14.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0 fuse-encfs-1.5-12.fc14.i686 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.41.0 fuse-encfs-1.5-12.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) fuse-encfs-1.5-12.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) fusecompress-2.6-6.20100223git754bc0de.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) fusecompress-2.6-6.20100223git754bc0de.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) fusecompress-2.6-6.20100223git754bc0de.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
Re: Boot time graphics
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:47 -0400, TK009 wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:20 -0400, TK009 wrote: Until recently I would see it only rarely being a freedom hater and using the bad nvidia drivers. A. Useless rant / flame. The problem has -nothing- to do with Fedora. B. You can enable it (nvidia binary drivers) by adding vga=xxx to your kernel command line. C. ... If nVidia will -choose- to add KMS support to their binary drivers, vga=xxx will no longer be required. - Gilboa -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test I think you are lost. Yes I knew that and don't care enough to enable it. Just pointing out why I don't see it and therefore never paid it much attention. It was neither a flame or a rant. Calling you asshat would be a flame or a rant. See the difference? *Sigh* - Gilboa -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable ---+ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect| Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Resolution:|Keywords: ---+ Comment (by toshio): As a point of reference, but perhaps not relevant here's the packaging Guidelines for conflicts: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts Summary: file conflicts are always a bug to be fixed and should be fixed ASAP. Explicit Conflicts are almost always a bug to be fixed but leeway for fixing it exists. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116#comment:12 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #75: proventester mentor request: rdieter
#75: proventester mentor request: rdieter --+- Reporter: rdieter | Owner: adamwill Type: proventester request | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: fixed|Keywords: --+- Changes (by adamwill): * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed Comment: Then you are hereby anointed a proven tester - go forth and test! -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/75#comment:7 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #100: mentor request
#100: mentor request --+- Reporter: mrunge | Owner: jlaska Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: --+- Comment (by adamwill): Hi, Matthias - I guess James is busy. Have you applied to the 'proventesters' group in FAS yet? If not, please do that, and then we can sponsor you into the group. Thanks! -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/100#comment:3 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable ---+ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect| Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Resolution:|Keywords: ---+ Comment (by adamwill): kparal: How do we check available for selection? We can't crawl through all the package lists to see whether a package is available for selection or not. For the groups that you can pick during install (where you pick 'desktop' or 'minimal' or whatever), simple - just do an install and try picking each. For manual package selection, I'm told only packages listed in comps and marked as 'visible' are available there. It should be trivial to generate that list and compare it against the list of packages we find are conflicting. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116#comment:13 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 14 Alpha RC Validation Test Summary
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:04 +0800, He Rui wrote: Greetings testers, Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC validation test events, especially for Andre's leading of the events, quite a mount of bugs were identified and fixed until RC4 was posted and finally meets Alpha Release Criteria[1]. As always, here I summarized the test result based on the tests in both test matrices: Suggestion to avoid confusion for the future - separate the bug lists by release (Alpha, Beta, Final) and into 'warn' and 'fail' groups? That way it's more obvious when we encounter bugs during, say, Alpha testing, which don't actually block Alpha release. If this is too much work, just ignore it :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Boot time graphics
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 18:54 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: I think you are lost. Yes I knew that and don't care enough to enable it. Just pointing out why I don't see it and therefore never paid it much attention. It was neither a flame or a rant. Calling you asshat would be a flame or a rant. See the difference? *Sigh* Come on, guys, this isn't -devel :) It looked to me like tk009 was just being light-hearted in his original post. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 alpha RC4: tons of sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping messages?
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:29 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/2010 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:56 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
I've just did a fresh install of F14alpha RC4 to see if I could
reproduce a bug. When checking /var/log/messages a see a ton of these:
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Is this a known problem?
Is that before or after applying updates?
This was before applying updates. After updating I now longer see the
messages appear.
What does
#ausearch -m avc -ts recent
show?
For completeness I checked it. This only shows 'normal' AVC denied
messages from my current boot up. They are all from setroubleshootd
(comm=setroubleshootd). I am not sure this is normal behavior.
They are all like (at least 20 or so):
time-Wed Aug 18 18:33:02 2010
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1282149182.060:24): arch=c03e syscall=87
success=no exit=-13 a0=7fff4f795fa0 a1=0 a2=4c4dfc3c a3=1 items=0 ppid=1
pid=1684 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0
fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=setroubleshootd
exe=/usr/bin/python subj=system_u:system_r:setroubleshootd_t:s0
key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1282149182.060:24): avc: denied { write } for
pid=1684 comm=setroubleshootd name=plugins dev=dm-0 ino=397348
scontext=system_u:system_r:setroubleshootd_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 tclass=dir
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting August 19, 2010 @ 12:00 AM UTC
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:59 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Thursday, August 19, 2010, @ 12:00 AM UTC ( *20:00 EDT/17:00 PDT-- Wednesday, August 18, 2010* ) Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting. Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team. For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime keep an eye on the Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker list (which is currently EMPTY!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611990hide_resolved=1 James and I both send apologies for this meeting. If someone else wants to represent QA - Will? Kamil? Adam M? - that'd be great. James and I aren't aware right now of any reason from QA's perspective not to go ahead and ship RC4, now 596985 has been decided to be not a blocker. We have no open blockers and the test matrices show no blocking fails for Alpha tests. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #100: mentor request
#100: mentor request --+- Reporter: mrunge | Owner: jlaska Type: proventester request | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: fixed|Keywords: --+- Changes (by jlaska): * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed Comment: Replying to [comment:5 mrunge]: Hey, no problem. I did apply a few seconds ago to the proventesters group. Great, I've sponsored your FAS membership. Welcome to the group, and happy testing! :) -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/100#comment:6 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RE: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting August 19, 2010 @ 12:00 AM UTC
Adam, I will be available. Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting August 19, 2010 @ 12:00 AM UTC From: awill...@redhat.com To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:36:46 -0700 On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:59 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Thursday, August 19, 2010, @ 12:00 AM UTC ( *20:00 EDT/17:00 PDT-- Wednesday, August 18, 2010* ) Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting. Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team. For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime keep an eye on the Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker list (which is currently EMPTY!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611990hide_resolved=1 James and I both send apologies for this meeting. If someone else wants to represent QA - Will? Kamil? Adam M? - that'd be great. James and I aren't aware right now of any reason from QA's perspective not to go ahead and ship RC4, now 596985 has been decided to be not a blocker. We have no open blockers and the test matrices show no blocking fails for Alpha tests. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 alpha RC4: tons of sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping messages?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/2010 12:42 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:29 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/2010 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:56 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
I've just did a fresh install of F14alpha RC4 to see if I could
reproduce a bug. When checking /var/log/messages a see a ton of these:
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Aug 17 19:45:49 f14alpha-rc4 sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot,
dropping message
Is this a known problem?
Is that before or after applying updates?
This was before applying updates. After updating I now longer see the
messages appear.
What does
#ausearch -m avc -ts recent
show?
For completeness I checked it. This only shows 'normal' AVC denied
messages from my current boot up. They are all from setroubleshootd
(comm=setroubleshootd). I am not sure this is normal behavior.
They are all like (at least 20 or so):
time-Wed Aug 18 18:33:02 2010
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1282149182.060:24): arch=c03e syscall=87
success=no exit=-13 a0=7fff4f795fa0 a1=0 a2=4c4dfc3c a3=1 items=0 ppid=1
pid=1684 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0
fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=setroubleshootd
exe=/usr/bin/python subj=system_u:system_r:setroubleshootd_t:s0
key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1282149182.060:24): avc: denied { write } for
pid=1684 comm=setroubleshootd name=plugins dev=dm-0 ino=397348
scontext=system_u:system_r:setroubleshootd_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 tclass=dir
If this is F14, you need to make sure you have fully updated. Python2.7
changes was causing random apps to try to recompile their pyc files.
This would cause the behavior you are seeing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxsaQ4ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNvHACfYAOQvJVZGEwCAs/r6kK7Pof/
mrMAoL0fnhBcLsCmwXIKjPhneOf9MpGf
=2R/j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #117: proventester request for petersen (aka juhp)
#117: proventester request for petersen (aka juhp) --+- Reporter: petersen | Owner: maxamillion Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: --+- Comment (by petersen): Thanks Adam, yes I have read through Proven_tester. I am hanging around on #fedora-qa - my timezone is UTC+1000. Thanks, Jens -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/117#comment:2 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 14 updates-testing report
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing glib2-2.25.14-2.fc14 polkit-0.97-5.fc14 polkit-gnome-0.97-4.fc14 rubygem-jnunemaker-matchy-0.4.0-2.fc14 upower-0.9.5-7.fc14 wavemon-0.6.11-1.fc14 Details about builds: glib2-2.25.14-2.fc14 (FEDORA-2010-13005) A library of handy utility functions Update Information: This update includes several fixes on top of the upstream polkit 0.97 release to fix issues in that release. ChangeLog: * Wed Aug 18 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.25.14-2 - Fix a PolicyKit problem * Tue Aug 17 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.25.14-1 - Update to 2.25.14 4-1 - Update to 2.25.14 4-1 - Update to 2.25.14 4-1 - Update to 2.25.14 * Thu Aug 12 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.25.13-2 - Rebuild * Fri Aug 6 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.25.13-1 - Update to 2.25.13 * Tue Aug 3 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.25.12-2 - Fix a bug that causes nautilus crashes * Mon Aug 2 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.25.12-1 - Update to 2.25.12 References: [ 1 ] Bug #623535 - Lost gnome menu entry System-Shutdown in the panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623535 [ 2 ] Bug #623257 - Can not reboot anymore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623257 polkit-0.97-5.fc14 (FEDORA-2010-13005) PolicyKit Authorization Framework Update Information: This update includes several fixes on top of the upstream polkit 0.97 release to fix issues in that release. ChangeLog: * Wed Aug 18 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 0.97-5 - Rebuid to work around bodhi limitations * Wed Aug 18 2010 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 0.97-4 - Fix a ConsoleKit interaction bug * Fri Aug 13 2010 David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com - 0.97-3 - Add a patch to make pkcheck(1) work the way libvirtd uses it (#623257) - Require GLib = 2.25.12 instead of 2.25.11 - Ensure polkit-gnome packages earlier than 0.97 are not used with these packages * Mon Aug 9 2010 David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com - 0.97-2 - Rebuild * Mon Aug 9 2010 David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com - 0.97-1 - Update to 0.97. This release contains a port from EggDBus to the GDBus code available in recent GLib releases. References: [ 1 ] Bug #623535 - Lost gnome menu entry System-Shutdown in the panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623535 [ 2 ] Bug #623257 - Can not reboot anymore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623257 polkit-gnome-0.97-4.fc14 (FEDORA-2010-13005) PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop Update Information: This update includes several fixes on top of the upstream polkit 0.97 release to fix issues in that release. ChangeLog: * Mon Aug 9 2010 David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com - 0.97-4 - Bump polkit req to 0.97 since we have to chainbuild anyway. Sigh. * Mon Aug 9 2010 David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com - 0.97-3 - Nuke patch that was committed upstream * Mon Aug 9 2010 David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com - 0.97-2 - Fix up BRs * Mon Aug 9 2010 David Zeuthen dav...@redhat.com - 0.97-1 - Update to 0.97 References: [ 1 ] Bug #623535 - Lost gnome menu entry System-Shutdown in the panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623535 [ 2 ] Bug #623257 - Can not reboot anymore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623257 rubygem-jnunemaker-matchy-0.4.0-2.fc14 (FEDORA-2010-13006) RSpec-esque matchers for use in Test::Unit References: [ 1 ] Bug #624490 - Review Request: rubygem-jnunemaker-matchy -- RSpec-esque matchers for use in Test::Unit
Re: Boot time graphics
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:47 PM, TK009 john.brown...@gmail.com wrote: I think you are lost. Yes I knew that and don't care enough to enable it. Just pointing out why I don't see it and therefore never paid it much attention. It was neither a flame or a rant. Calling you asshat would be a flame or a rant. See the difference? -- After reading other comments to in this thread, it seems that I misread your original comments as a rant, while it was intended to be light-headed. Please accept my apologies for my previous comment. - Gilboa -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Can't read last ~5% of a remote file
I'm getting the same symptoms as a bug that was closed during f11 (and f12) in f13. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516165 Any chance that this bug has re-emerged? R. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
