Re: [Fedora QA] #222: L10N Test Day

2011-08-02 Thread Fedora QA
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
  Reporter:  noriko|   Owner:   
  Type:  task  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major |   Milestone:  Fedora 16
 Component:  Test Day  | Version:   
Resolution:|Keywords:   
---+
Comment (by noriko):

  According to noriko, the specific images will be provided for L10N test
 day, so I guess the installed system is not suitable for test? But it's a
 good idea to do it before i18n desktop day. Also as Igor suggested, we
 still give each test day an exact date but with proper announcements. In
 all the test week could be organized like:
 
  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-08-22_L10n_Desktop
 (Mon)
  *
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-08-24_L10n_i18n_Installation
 (Wed)
  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-08-26_I18n_Desktop
 (Fri)
 
  I've updated the test day schedule to include these. Feel free to
 discuss and modify it in need.

 Sorry replying late. It looks beautiful.[[BR]]
 One favour, is it possible or too late to change L10N test date from
 2011-08-22 to 2011-08-23 Tuesday?[[BR]]
 The image to be used for this test will be composed on 2011-08-19 Friday.
 It is convenient to have a day (Monday) for preparation before
 testing.[[BR]]
 This is minor, and both dates fine but just preference.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/222#comment:23
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main

2011-08-02 Thread Frank Murphy
Trying to test upgrade to branched. using preupgrade

from full updated F15.

Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main

This could be caused by a missing network connection or a bad mirror.

My net is fine, only branched seems borked for me.


-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main

2011-08-02 Thread Hongqing Yang
I think it is the same with the bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727428

- Original Message -
 From: Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
 To: FPO-testing test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2011 4:17:10 PM
 Subject: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main
 Trying to test upgrade to branched. using preupgrade
 
 from full updated F15.
 
 Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main
 
 This could be caused by a missing network connection or a bad mirror.
 
 My net is fine, only branched seems borked for me.
 
 
 --
 Regards,
 
 Frank Murphy
 UTF_8 Encoded
 Friend of fedoraproject.org
 --
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main

2011-08-02 Thread Frank Murphy
On 02/08/11 09:47, Hongqing Yang wrote:
 I think it is the same with the bug at
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727428


I'm not using anaconda, well it'n not installed.
mirrormanager problem?



-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


rawhide report: 20110802 changes

2011-08-02 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Aug  2 08:15:21 UTC 2011

Broken deps for x86_64
--
LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
LuxRender-core-0.7.1-6.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
QuantLib-test-1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcryptui.so.0()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.2.14-7.fc16.i686 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26
1:anerley-0.2.14-7.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26()(64bit)
assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit)
awstats-7.0-3.fc16.noarch requires perl(Switch)
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
bluetile-0.5.3-11.fc16.x86_64 requires ghc(xmonad-contrib-0.9.2) = 
0:d669bbdb9b9f7adb145fcb61825dec73
1:cheese-3.0.2-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit)
1:cheese-libs-3.0.2-1.fc16.i686 requires libcogl.so.1
1:cheese-libs-3.0.2-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit)
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.9-7.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libcogl.so.1()(64bit)
cluster-snmp-0.18.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit)
clutter-gtk-1.0.2-1.fc16.i686 requires libcogl.so.1
clutter-gtk-1.0.2-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit)
coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit)
coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit)
coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit)
coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit)
coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit)
coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit)
coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit)
coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit)
coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit)
coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires rvm-tools
coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit)
coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit)
coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit)
coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit)
coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit)
coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit)
collectl-3.5.1-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(Switch)
comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-18.noarch requires comoonics-base-py
comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-24.noarch requires comoonics-base-py
contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1
contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit)
deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit)
deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-applet
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
ease-0.4-5.fc16.i686 requires libcogl.so.1
ease-0.4-5.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit)
easystroke-0.5.4-1.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-5.fc15.noarch requires gwave
empathy-3.1.3-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit)
eog-plugins-3.1.2-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit)
evolution-mapi-3.1.3-1.fc16.i686 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.27

F16 Alpha

2011-08-02 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
Downloaded the x86_64 iso and wrote it to a jump drive with
Live USB creator.  Was unable to install from this image.
Better luck was had with a dvd-rw.

The basic storage checker throws an unhandled exception
apparently when it sees sda.  Sda contains several bootable
systems.

I got past that by using specialized storage devices and
installing to a different drive.

Both desktop and development choices failed dependency tests.
I was able to do a minimal install.  No network, no X.  Not too
useful.

A bit of local testing might be in order before the next alpha spin.


-- 
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
   Omen Technology Inc  The High Reliability Software
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: F16 Alpha

2011-08-02 Thread Masami Ichikawa
on 08/02/2011 10:01 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
 The basic storage checker throws an unhandled exception
 apparently when it sees sda.  Sda contains several bootable
 systems.
 
I may have same problem. In my case anaconda crashes after host name setup 
menu. I used empty ext4 formatted disk. 
Anyway, I filled a bug report for this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727573

Cheers,
-- 
/*
 * Masami Ichikawa
 * gmail: masami...@gmail.com
 * Fedora project: mas...@fedoraproject.org
 */
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


top using full cpu core session/process management weirdness

2011-08-02 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
Hi,
I just stumbled over a strange phenomenon that makes top go bananas.

To reproduce open one shell window (and only one), switch to root and run 
top. Now close the shell window (without quitting top first).
top will now suddenly start to use 100% of one cpu core.

Things get more interesting when multiple shell windows are involved.
I this situation top only goes bonkers once you close the last (!) shell 
window. As long as any shell window is still open the top process will 
still run but not use many resources.

Regards,
   Dennis
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!

2011-08-02 Thread James Laska
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 18:16 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
 As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Test Compose 1
 (TC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
 download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
 images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
 for updates. When they appear, the download directory should be the same
 as that for install images, except with the trailing /Fedora/ replaced
 by /Live/.
 
 Installation:
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
 
 Base:
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test
 
 Desktop:
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
 
 Security Lab:
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test
 
 Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3],
 and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria
 [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the
 test list [7].
 
 task#16 - Create Alpha Test Compose (TC)
 https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4844
 
 F16 Alpha Blocker tracker bug:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713560
 
 F16 Alpha Nice-To-Have tracker bug:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713563
 
 [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html
 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing
 [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing
 [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing
 [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Alpha_Release_Criteria
 [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
 [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Hey testers!

Just a quick heads up about a mirroring problem you may encounter while
testing.  The 'repo=fedora-16' is not yet acknowledged by MirrorManager.
As a result, any references to a mirror url such as
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-16arch=x86_64
are not recognized.

Dgilmore informed me that additional changes were needed for
MirrorManager.  Those changes have been made, and should be visible
soon.  Until then, any yum requests that rely on the mirror URL shown
above will fail.  This also impacts TC1 installer testing as
demonstrated by the following bugs ...

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727428
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727510

Thanks,
James


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

using dl instead of serverbeach1 for test matrix page download links

2011-08-02 Thread Andre Robatino
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes:
 
 After discussing with smooge and nirik on #fedora-admin, decided to change the
 16 Alpha TC1 test matrix pages to use dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1.fp.o and
 alt.fp.o for download links. If no problems are seen, the template pages can 
 be
 changed to make it permanent. This would eliminate up to an hour's delay due
 to the mirroring from dl to serverbeach1. The latter is still operating as a
mirror
 and will be available in case there are problems using dl.

Any problems seen with using dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1? If not, I'll go
ahead and put the change in the templates as well before the next TC/RC.




-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Version 16 not an option in bugzilla

2011-08-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 14:36 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
 With the branch sort of complete, shouldn't 16 be an option for the version
 now? (Currently I am not seeing it as an option when submitting bugs.)

Yes, it should be. If it still isn't, you can email
bugzilla-reque...@redhat.com , I believe this is the last procedure I
heard of for getting stuff done in RH bugzilla...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Anaconda is forcing GPT on non-EFI BIOS

2011-08-02 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
Hello,

I noticed when I tried to install F16 Alpha TC1 on a new guest ie: 
without any existing partition table that Anaconda is forcing GPT 
instead of msdos even on a classic BIOS (non EFI)

Any idea why ?

Thanks.
-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Anaconda is forcing GPT on non-EFI BIOS

2011-08-02 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 08/02/2011 07:36 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 Hello,

 I noticed when I tried to install F16 Alpha TC1 on a new guest ie:
 without any existing partition table that Anaconda is forcing GPT
 instead of msdos even on a classic BIOS (non EFI)

 Any idea why ?


Maybe it's related to:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GUID_Partition_Table

-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Anaconda is forcing GPT on non-EFI BIOS

2011-08-02 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 08/02/2011 07:45 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 07:36 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 Hello,

 I noticed when I tried to install F16 Alpha TC1 on a new guest ie:
 without any existing partition table that Anaconda is forcing GPT
 instead of msdos even on a classic BIOS (non EFI)

 Any idea why ?


 Maybe it's related to:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GUID_Partition_Table


I found some good info here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694808

-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Anaconda is forcing GPT on non-EFI BIOS

2011-08-02 Thread David Cantrell
On 08/02/2011 02:52 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 07:45 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 07:36 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 Hello,

 I noticed when I tried to install F16 Alpha TC1 on a new guest ie:
 without any existing partition table that Anaconda is forcing GPT
 instead of msdos even on a classic BIOS (non EFI)

 Any idea why ?


 Maybe it's related to:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GUID_Partition_Table


 I found some good info here:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694808


Correct.  There's no forcing by us, your hardware forced us to use GPT 
because of the size of its disk.

If you have a UEFI-capable system, I suggest using it in UEFI mode.

-- 
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Fedora QA] #215: Request for mentor to become the Proven Tester

2011-08-02 Thread Fedora QA
#215: Request for mentor to become the Proven Tester
--+-
  Reporter:  seenafcqa|   Owner:  jlaska
  Type:  proventester request |  Status:  closed
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:
 Component:  Proventester Mentor Request  | Version:
Resolution:  fixed|Keywords:
--+-
Changes (by jlaska):

  * status:  assigned = closed
  * resolution:  = fixed

Comment:

 Replying to [comment:4 seenafcqa]:
  Also I have applied for the membership in FAS.

 Excellent.  I sponsored your membership request, you are now an official
 proventester!  Welcome and happy testing!  Please don't hesitate to ask
 questions or post ideas to test@lists.fedoraproject.org.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/215#comment:5
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Anaconda is forcing GPT on non-EFI BIOS

2011-08-02 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 08/02/2011 08:52 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 02:52 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 07:45 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 07:36 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 Hello,
snip

 I found some good info here:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694808


 Correct.  There's no forcing by us, your hardware forced us to use GPT
 because of the size of its disk.

 If you have a UEFI-capable system, I suggest using it in UEFI mode.


Weird because it was a KVM guest with 32G disk

-- 
Athmane Madjoudj
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Anaconda is forcing GPT on non-EFI BIOS

2011-08-02 Thread David Cantrell
On 08/02/2011 04:05 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 08:52 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 02:52 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 07:45 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 On 08/02/2011 07:36 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
 Hello,
 snip

 I found some good info here:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694808


 Correct.  There's no forcing by us, your hardware forced us to use GPT
 because of the size of its disk.

 If you have a UEFI-capable system, I suggest using it in UEFI mode.


 Weird because it was a KVM guest with 32G disk


That definitely sounds suspicious.

-- 
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Fedora 16 updates-testing report

2011-08-02 Thread updates
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cifs-utils-5.0-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-7.6-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openarena-0.8.5-4.fc16,quake3-1.36-11.svn2102.fc16


The following Fedora 16 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.10.0-13.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.6.17-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsepol-2.1.1-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/redhat-rpm-config-9.1.0-14.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iputils-20101006-10.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udev-173-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.6.99-2.20110601giteaf202531.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.3.50.20110722-3.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.3.50.20110722-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.1-184.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.14.2-1.20110727git8c9266ed2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gobject-introspection-1.29.16-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.2-7.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcc-4.6.1-5.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvfs-1.9.2-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wpa_supplicant-0.7.3-9.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/binutils-2.21.53.0.1-2.fc16


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 16 updates-testing

389-ds-base-1.2.9.1-2.fc16
PackageKit-0.6.17-2.fc16
bluez-4.96-1.fc16
cheese-3.0.2-2.fc16
clutter-gtk-1.0.2-2.fc16
ease-0.4-6.fc16
eiciel-0.9.8.1-1.fc16
empathy-3.1.4-1.fc16
eog-plugins-3.1.2-2.fc16
florence-0.5.0-2.fc16
gaupol-0.19-1.fc16
gnome-games-3.1.4-2.fc16
gnome-shell-3.1.4-1.fc16
gnote-0.7.5-1.fc16
hamlib-1.2.14-1.fc16
irrlicht-1.7.2-7.fc16
kanatest-0.4.8-6.fc16
kdesdk-4.7.0-1.fc16
libreport-2.0.5-4.fc16
llvm-2.9-1.fc16
mairix-0.23-1.fc16
marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-3.fc16
memtester-4.2.2-1.fc16
mesa-7.11-1.fc16
mutter-3.1.4-1.fc16
obexd-0.42-1.fc16
python-virtinst-0.600.0-4.fc16
ruby-gnome2-0.90.4-1.5.fc16
rubygem-rhc-0.73.14-1.fc16
rubygem-state_machine-1.0.1-1.fc16
rusers-0.17-65.fc16
rwall-0.17-33.fc16
selinux-policy-3.10.0-13.fc16
stdair-0.36.2-1.fc16
sugar-turtleart-113-1.fc16
sushi-0.0.5-1.fc16
virt-manager-0.9.0-5.fc16
xorg-x11-drv-displaylink-0-1.20110102git.fc16
xtide-2.12-0.4.dev20110731.fc16

Details about builds:



 389-ds-base-1.2.9.1-2.fc16 (FEDORA-2011-10178)
 389 Directory Server (base)

Update Information:

A few bug fixes

ChangeLog:

* Tue Aug  2 2011 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com - 1.2.9.1-2
- Bug 723937 - Slapi_Counter API broken on  32-bit F15
-   fixed to use configure test for GCC provided 64-bit atomic functions
* Wed Jul 27 2011 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com - 1.2.9.1-1
- Bug 663752 - Cert renewal for attrcrypt and encchangelog
-   this was re-fixed due to a deadlock condition with cl2ldif task cancel
- Bug 725953 - Winsync: DS entries fail to sync to AD, if the User's CN entry 
contains a comma
- Bug 725743 - Make memberOf use PRMonitor for it's operation lock
- Bug 725542 - Instance upgrade fails when upgrading 389-ds-base package
- Bug 723937 - Slapi_Counter API broken on  32-bit F15

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #723937 - replication failing on RUV errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723937
  [ 2 ] Bug #725542 - Instance upgrade fails when upgrading 389-ds-base package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725542
  [ 3 ] Bug #725743 - Directory server hangs during unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725743
  [ 4 ] Bug #725953 - Winsync: DS entries fail to sync to AD, if the User's CN 
entry contains a comma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725953
  [ 5 ] Bug #663752 - Cert renewal for attrcrypt and encchangelog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663752




 PackageKit-0.6.17-2.fc16 (FEDORA-2011-10167)
 Package management service

Update Information:

- New upstream release.
- Manually convert the results of GetDetails to unicode.
- Parse 

warning to delta ISO users: rawread script can no longer be reliably used to extract Fedora images from disc

2011-08-02 Thread Andre Robatino
I removed all references to the rawread script from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Delta_ISOs . This script can be used to extract
ISO files from burned media, using the Volume Space Size in the ISO header to
read off the correct amount. Unfortunately, many of the recent Fedora images,
including the 16-Alpha.TC1 x86_64 DVD, are not true ISOs and include extra
padding beyond the size indicated by the ISO header. This means that if such an
image is read off a burned optical disc using rawread, it will be truncated.
This both prevents the checksum from matching and prevents applydeltaiso from
working if the delta ISO was made using the untruncated oldiso file.

I prefer to continue making delta ISOs using the official checksummed ISO
files for both oldiso and newiso. This means that in general the rawread script
should no longer be used to read oldiso off a burned optical disc into a file.
For oldiso, one should either use the ISO file matching the official checksum,
or use the disc directly (applydeltaiso /dev/dvd diso newiso).

It's still possible to read an ISO file off a burned optical disc by
specifying the size directly. For example, Fedora-16-Alpha.TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso is
3589275648 bytes = 1752576 2048-byte blocks, although the Volume Space Size is
1752162 blocks. The rawread script would only read off the latter amount,
truncating the file. Using the explicit command

dd if=/dev/dvd bs=2048 count=1752576 conv=notrunc,noerror  oldiso

will read off the file correctly. This requires knowing the exact size of the
file, which may not be available (especially for TCs/RCs which get deleted
often). I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727387 in the hope
of having file sizes included in the official checksum files. (Note that I filed
the bug before finding this issue - there are probably others lurking.)

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Test-Announce] 2011-08-04 Fedora 15 EC2 Test Day

2011-08-02 Thread Tim Flink
This is a little later than originally planned, but the Fedora 15
(yes, Fedora 15 - not a typo) EC2 test day will be on this Thursday
2011-08-04 [1].

Fedora 15 AMIs are available for testing and are listed on the test
day wiki page [1]. The tests are designed to ensure basic functionality
for the AMIs (MTA, httpd, yum etc.).

Since these tests require an Amazon AWS account, we are offering some
compensation (up to US$5) for the first 10 people to go through the EC2
test cases. This will be done on a first come, first served basis -
make sure that you contact rbergeron to verify that you are one of the
10 people or you may not get the credit.

Tim

PS - If you have the means to pay for the EC2 time or a free account,
please use that. We're just trying to make sure that everyone who wants
to participate can.

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-08-04_Cloud_SIG_Fedora_EC2




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: top using full cpu core session/process management weirdness

2011-08-02 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:12:54 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
 Hi,
 I just stumbled over a strange phenomenon that makes top go bananas.
 
 To reproduce open one shell window (and only one), switch to root
 and run top. Now close the shell window (without quitting top
 first).  top will now suddenly start to use 100% of one cpu core.

I can't reproduce this.

I suspect that because I'm using KDE and konsole.

$ konsole --version
Qt: 4.7.3
KDE Development Platform: 4.6.5 (4.6.5)
Konsole: 2.6.4
$

-- 
Garry Williams
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: using dl instead of serverbeach1 for test matrix page download links

2011-08-02 Thread Hongqing Yang


- Original Message -
 From: Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org
 To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 12:01:42 AM
 Subject: using dl instead of serverbeach1 for test matrix page download links
 Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes:
 
  After discussing with smooge and nirik on #fedora-admin, decided to
  change the
  16 Alpha TC1 test matrix pages to use dl.fp.o instead of
  serverbeach1.fp.o and
  alt.fp.o for download links. If no problems are seen, the template
  pages can be
  changed to make it permanent. This would eliminate up to an hour's
  delay due
  to the mirroring from dl to serverbeach1. The latter is still
  operating as a
 mirror
  and will be available in case there are problems using dl.
 
 Any problems seen with using dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1? If not,
 I'll go
 ahead and put the change in the templates as well before the next
 TC/RC.
 

everything is fine. Thanks.

Hongqing
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2011-08-02 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cifs-utils-4.8.1-7.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-7.6-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-0.97.2-1400.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cgit-0.9.0.2-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.4.8-1.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.8.4-2.git20110622.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-firewall-1.2.27-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsndfile-1.0.25-1.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.78.5-2.svn14966.fc14,glpi-data-injection-2.0.2-1.fc14,glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.4.2-1.fc14,glpi-pdf-0.7.2-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.4.3.2-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcap-2.22-1.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quake3-1.36-11.svn2102.fc14,openarena-0.8.5-4.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsoup-2.32.2-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.4.0-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-21.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.23-10.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdk-pixbuf2-2.22.0-2.fc14


The following Fedora 14 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.4.0-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsoup-2.32.2-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcap-2.22-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pinentry-0.8.1-4.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.1.3-0.git20100804.3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsndfile-1.0.25-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sed-4.2.1-6.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ModemManager-0.4.998-1.git20110706.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unique-1.1.6-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-savage-2.3.2-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.22-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdk-pixbuf2-2.22.0-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.12.4-146.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/policycoreutils-2.0.85-30.2.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-8.fc14.2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.0.21-3.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-14.20101010git8c8f15c.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libconcord-0.23-5.fc14,udev-161-9.fc14,concordance-0.23-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.23-10.fc14


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing

389-admin-1.1.21-1.fc14
389-ds-base-1.2.9.1-2.fc14
byobu-4.23-1.fc14
fwsnort-1.6-1.fc14
gnome-chemistry-utils-0.12.8-4.fc14
gnumeric-1.10.17-1.fc14
goffice-0.8.17-1.fc14
marathi-typing-booster-0.0.1-2.fc14
pam_afs_session-2.5-1.fc14
paraview-3.10.1-3.fc14
qbittorrent-2.8.3-1.fc14
rubygem-rhc-0.73.14-1.fc14
stdair-0.36.2-1.fc14
sugar-turtleart-113-1.fc14
supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc14
sx-2.03-8.fc14.1
systemtap-1.6-1.fc14
xtide-2.12-0.4.dev20110731.fc14

Details about builds:



 389-admin-1.1.21-1.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-10207)
 389 Administration Server (admin)

Update Information:

bugfix
several tls/ssl and migration bug fixes
Rebuild with 389-adminutil-1.1.14
look for separate openldap ldif library
skip rebranding current brand - add support for different skins

ChangeLog:

* Tue Aug  2 2011 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com - 1.1.21-1
- Bug 476925 - Admin Server: Do not allow 8-bit passwords for the admin user
* Tue Jul  5 2011 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com - 1.1.20-3
- bump rel to rebuild with 389-adminutil-1.1.14
* Tue Jul  5 2011 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com - 1.1.20-2
- bump rel to rebuild with 389-adminutil-1.1.14
* Tue Jul  5 2011 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com - 1.1.20-1
- Bug 719056 - migrate-ds-admin.pl needs to update SELinux policy
- Bug 718285 - AdminServer should use service command instead of 
start/stop/restart scripts
- Bug 718079 - Perl errors when running migrate-ds-admin.pl
- Bug 713000 - Migration stops if old admin server cannot be stopped
- added tests for the security cgi
- fix typo in NSS_Shutdown warning message
- better NSS error