Re: Testing request: gnutls update for F19

2014-03-05 Thread Jonathan Calloway
Thank you!

Jonathan Calloway

Sent from my iPad

 On Mar 5, 2014, at 2:22 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
 
 On 03/05/14 15:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:14 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
 Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this 
 bug?
 
 Jonathan Calloway
 Just ensuring it doesn't break any dependent apps would be useful. I
 don't know offhand how to check the actual vulnerability has been
 correctly fixed, but as long as the update doesn't actually make
 anything *worse*, we can't hurt anything by getting it to stable ASAP,
 and I'm kinda figuring the RH security folks have verified the
 vulnerability fix already.
 
 Besides, maybe telling folks who don't know how to exploit the vulnerability 
 isn't such a good idea?  :-) :-)
 
 -- 
 Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Testing request: gnutls update for F19

2014-03-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 15:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 On 03/05/14 15:00, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:14 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
  Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for 
  this bug?
 
  Jonathan Calloway
  Just ensuring it doesn't break any dependent apps would be useful. I
  don't know offhand how to check the actual vulnerability has been
  correctly fixed, but as long as the update doesn't actually make
  anything *worse*, we can't hurt anything by getting it to stable ASAP,
  and I'm kinda figuring the RH security folks have verified the
  vulnerability fix already.
 
 Besides, maybe telling folks who don't know how to exploit the
 vulnerability isn't such a good idea?  :-) :-)

That's 'security by obscurity', which is no security at all in the case
of a publicly disclosed vulnerability. Trying to obfuscate the issue for
some specific sub-culture once a comprehensive public description
available is just silly.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

DNF feedback request

2014-03-05 Thread Adam Williamson
Caught this on Planet Fedora today: the DNF devs are asking for feedback
on use of the 'yum repo-pkgs' subcommands - they'd like to find out
which of them people are actively using. See
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/03/05/dnf-0-4-17-released/ .
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test