Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning

[Joerg Lechner]

 Hi,
I am in discussion with Nvidia Support, to get known, why I can not install the 
Nvidia Grafics Driver.
Mike from Nvidia Support asked me the following:

I reviewed your lspci -nn output and I  see two VGA devices below:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT 
Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0a16] (rev 0b) 
03:00.0 3D controller [0302]: NVIDIA Corporation GM108M [GeForce 840M] 
[10de:1341] (rev a2)

This means that your laptop is an Optimus laptop.

Please let me know if you can disable Optimus or disable the onboard Intel 
graphics card.  
 
---
I let You know, when there is a solution to install the Nvidia driver 
correctly, but
if the "Optimus Laptop" is the reason, this could be interesting for all 
others, not being able,
to install the Nvidia grafics driver.
Kind Regards

 

-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- 
Von: Reynold 
An: test 
Verschickt: Di, 11 Nov 2014 6:48 pm
Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning


How to manually install NVIDIA graphics driver

using yum or dnf (I prefer dnf so I will use that)

#dnf clean all
#dnf update
#dnf install gcc kernel-devel dkms

download NVIDIA driver from nvidia.com and cd to the download directory
#chmod +x NVIDIA-XXX.run (the NVIDIA driver, for instance 
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)

#vi /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf and insert a line with text 
"blacklist nouveau" (without quotes)
#vi /etc/sysconfig/grub and insert this text 
"rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau" (without quotes) and the end
of the line beginning with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= making sure the text is 
inside the last quotation mark

#grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg

#dnf remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.x86x_64 (this is 64bit driver - if you 
have a 32bit operating system it will be 32bit driver)

#reboot

When you are in grub and the and your operating system kernel is 
highlighted as the one you are booting to press the "e" on the keyboard 
to edit the line
Then at the end of this line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT= still inside 
the ending quotes insert this text "init 3" (without quotes)
press F10 to reboot

you should then come to a command prompt where you log on as a root user
cd to the download directory where the NVIDIA driver located
#./NVIDIA-XXX.run (for instance ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)
The NVIDIA installer will start
Accept the license agreement
Install 32 bit compatibility (if you are on a 64bit machine)
Choose to automatically update nvidia-xconfig-utility

reboot and log into graphical mode or from command line using root init 5

Hope this helps

Reynold

On 11/10/2014 11:49 PM, Bidski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you instruct me in how you installed the nVidia drivers?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> "Joerg Lechner" 
>
> To:
> , 
> Cc:
>
> Sent:
> Tue, 11 Nov 2014 02:18:35 -0500
> Subject:
> Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning
>
>
> Hi,
> on my laptop there is a Nvidia Geforce 840M (Acer Aspire E15, E5
> 571G). I didn't have any problems with the grafics drivers so far.
> Currently running F21 Final TC1.
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
> Von: Bidski 
> An: test 
> Verschickt: Mo, 10 Nov 2014 10:05 pm
> Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
> partitioning
>
>
> Has anyone had success installing the nVidia drivers in F21 yet?
> I am meeting some strange issues following the instructions for
> installing them in F20. Including this page
> (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9de7q9llhlamf32/IMG_20141110_192627.jpg?dl=0)
> displaying while booting after installing the drivers.
>
> I will generate some better diagnostics tonight.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> "Adam Williamson"  >
>
> To:
> "Bidski" mailto:bid...@iinet.net.au>>,
> "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>  >
> Cc:
>
> Sent:
> Sun, 09 Nov 2014 23:38:19 -0800
> Subject:
> Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
> partitioning
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:28 +1100, Bidski wrote:
> >
> > After shifting the partitions on my HDD up by about 200 MiB
> and then
> > using gdisk to convert the disk to GPT (did it this way to
> try and
> > preserve the existing Windows partitions), the Fedora
> installer now
> > only recognises my HDD as a multipath device.
>
> 

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

[Bodhi Zazen]

Adrian - I got the information from man yum and a little trial and error

- Original Message -
From: "Adrian" 
To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" 

Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:06:29 PM
Subject: Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with 
fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

Is there a particular url link available for the new yum with command 
formats & options available please ?

Adrian Fewster


On 13/11/14 08:57, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
> You can "fix" this with
>
> yum swap -- remove firewalld-config-standard fedora-release-cloud -- install 
> firewalld-config-workstation fedora-release-workstation
>
> swap workstation for non-product if you wish ;)
>
> IMHO it would be nice if it were easier / more straightforward to swap 
> between releases, although I could see that the list of packages that make up 
> the various releases may become divergent.
>
> FWIW I upgraded a few weeks ago and I do not recall an option to select cloud 
> vs workstation vs non-product , although as this is pre-release it may have 
> been resolved.
>
>

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

[Adrian]

Is there a particular url link available for the new yum with command 
formats & options available please ?


Adrian Fewster


On 13/11/14 08:57, Bodhi Zazen wrote:

You can "fix" this with

yum swap -- remove firewalld-config-standard fedora-release-cloud -- install 
firewalld-config-workstation fedora-release-workstation

swap workstation for non-product if you wish ;)

IMHO it would be nice if it were easier / more straightforward to swap between 
releases, although I could see that the list of packages that make up the 
various releases may become divergent.

FWIW I upgraded a few weeks ago and I do not recall an option to select cloud 
vs workstation vs non-product , although as this is pre-release it may have 
been resolved.




--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: 2014-11-12 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 

I'd like add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088619 
as blocker to release 21 . Please read last comments #95 still #101 


On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 11:26 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: 
> ==
> #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
> ==
> 
> Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-12/f21-blocker-review.2014-11-12-16.03.log.html
> .
> 
> Meeting summary
> ---
> * Roll Call  (roshi, 16:03:53)
> 
> * (1161779) System fails to boot with rootfs on iSCSI - missing kernel
>   parameters  (roshi, 16:07:30)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161779   (roshi,
> 16:07:33)
> * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (roshi, 16:07:36)
>   * AGREED: - 1161779 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a clear violation of
>   the Final criteria: "The installer must be able to detect (if
> possible) and install to supported network-attached storage
> devices."  (roshi, 16:14:04)
> 
> * (1162215) LV resize does not check filesystem minimum size  (roshi,
>   16:14:09)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162215   (roshi,
> 16:14:09)
> * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (roshi, 16:14:10)
>   * AGREED: - 11662215 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear 
> violation
>   of the Final criterion: "Any installer mechanism for resizing
> storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation."
> (roshi, 16:25:09)
> 
> * (1158442) Gnome-initial-setup window doesn't fit to visible with small
>   resolution  (roshi, 16:25:59)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158442   (roshi,
> 16:26:02)
> * Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup, MODIFIED  (roshi, 16:26:05)
>   * AGREED: - 1158442 - Punt - We're going to wait to decide on this
>   pending discussion and testing of an existing fix.  (roshi,
>   16:37:26)
> 
> * (986731) Dual boot of uefi Windows 7 and Fedora 19 fails to boot
>   Windows  (roshi, 16:37:41)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986731   (roshi,
> 16:37:45)
> * Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW  (roshi, 16:37:47)
>   * AGREED: - 986731 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't seem to be
>   reproducible on F21. If it is, please update the bug and 
> reproduce.
>   (roshi, 16:42:24)
> 
> * (1103496) Installer interface sometimes freezes for a while (but
>   install continues, and screen eventually unfreezes)  (roshi, 16:42:27)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103496   (roshi,
> 16:42:30)
> * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 16:42:33)
>   * LINK:
>   
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
>   (kparal, 16:58:43)
> * AGREED: - 1103496 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a 
> conditional
> violation of the Final Data Corruption criterion 
> since it creates
> the opportunity of data loss to the user (by 
> making them think the
> install has hung and the user restarts the 
> machine mid-install).
> (roshi, 17:02:22)
> 
> * (1144613) [abrt] gnome-tweak-tool: gtk_tree_row_ref_deleted():
>   python2.7 killed by SIGSEGV  (roshi, 17:02:37)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144613   (roshi,
> 17:02:40)
> * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:02:43)
>   * AGREED: - 1144613 - RejectedBlocker - The GNOME tweak tool is not 
> a
>   default application for the Workstation product, so this is not
>   considered a blocker.  (roshi, 17:10:09)
> 
> * (1147670) keyboard layout chooser switches letters while typing
>   (roshi, 17:10:18)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147670   (roshi,
> 17:10:21)
> * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:10:24)
>   * AGREED: - 1147670 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This
>   bug is difficult to reproduce and it seems to be very
>   system-dependant.  Accepting as an FE because if you do hit 
> it, it
>   would be pretty obnoxious. Repropose if more solid 
> reproduction
>   steps can be found or there is a concrete system on 
> which it is
>   quite difficult to perform Fedora installation. 
>  (roshi, 17:43:49)
> 
> * (1158968) AttributeError: 'DMRaidArrayDevice' object has no attribute
>   'formatClass'  (roshi, 17:44:00)
> * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158968   (roshi,
> 17:44:03)
> * Proposed Blocker, pyth

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

[Bodhi Zazen]

You can "fix" this with 

yum swap -- remove firewalld-config-standard fedora-release-cloud -- install 
firewalld-config-workstation fedora-release-workstation

swap workstation for non-product if you wish ;)

IMHO it would be nice if it were easier / more straightforward to swap between 
releases, although I could see that the list of packages that make up the 
various releases may become divergent.

FWIW I upgraded a few weeks ago and I do not recall an option to select cloud 
vs workstation vs non-product , although as this is pre-release it may have 
been resolved.

- Original Message -
From: "Michael Schwendt" 
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 11:29:22 AM
Subject: Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with 
fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:51:39 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:


> > fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
> > generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
> > 
> > 
> > Seems to me at some time a random generic dependency has been pulled in
> > and now causes problems. 
> 
> Er, no? You have no generic package installed.

# rpm -q --whatrequires fedora-release-cloud
no package requires fedora-release-cloud

# rpm --test -e fedora-release-cloud
error: Failed dependencies:
system-release-product is needed by (installed) 
fedora-release-21-0.16.noarch

As one can see, it's some virtual package or "capability", but not a direct
or strict dependency on "fedora-release-cloud".

Even the "fedora-release-nonproduct" package provides "system-release-product".

> There's nothing really 'mad' about it, all the deps are sane

Certainly not.

> (the point
> is to use different default firewall configurations with different
> Products),

That makes no sense.

  # rpm -qR fedora-release-cloud|grep -v ^rpm
  fedora-release = 21-0.16

Whether known or not, at least it is confirmed as a bug. I could also
have called it "insane", because XFCE should not conflict with the GNOME
desktop because of a "fedora-release-cloud" package that does not even
specify any strict dependencies.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

[poma]

https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/usb/power-management.txt
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/states.txt
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
https://01.org/linuxgraphics/documentation/how-debug-suspend-resume-issues-0
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Reference/S3
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Reference/S4

After reading all this with understanding, 
and after testing it with each of these steps, 
with different kernel versions that are available to you here
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
if you are unable to build your own kernel, 
then we can continue the discussion.


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

[poma]

On 12.11.2014 19:21, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> Please all of you with resume issues state if you are or are not using
> luksCrypt to encrypt your drives. There is a chance that this is
> systemd and luksCrypt issue.
> 

Hilarious.


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:51:39 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:


> > fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
> > generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
> > 
> > 
> > Seems to me at some time a random generic dependency has been pulled in
> > and now causes problems. 
> 
> Er, no? You have no generic package installed.

# rpm -q --whatrequires fedora-release-cloud
no package requires fedora-release-cloud

# rpm --test -e fedora-release-cloud
error: Failed dependencies:
system-release-product is needed by (installed) 
fedora-release-21-0.16.noarch

As one can see, it's some virtual package or "capability", but not a direct
or strict dependency on "fedora-release-cloud".

Even the "fedora-release-nonproduct" package provides "system-release-product".

> There's nothing really 'mad' about it, all the deps are sane

Certainly not.

> (the point
> is to use different default firewall configurations with different
> Products),

That makes no sense.

  # rpm -qR fedora-release-cloud|grep -v ^rpm
  fedora-release = 21-0.16

Whether known or not, at least it is confirmed as a bug. I could also
have called it "insane", because XFCE should not conflict with the GNOME
desktop because of a "fedora-release-cloud" package that does not even
specify any strict dependencies.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

2014-11-12 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

[Mike Ruckman]

==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==

Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-12/f21-blocker-review.2014-11-12-16.03.log.html
.

Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call  (roshi, 16:03:53)

* (1161779) System fails to boot with rootfs on iSCSI - missing kernel
  parameters  (roshi, 16:07:30)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161779   (roshi,
16:07:33)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (roshi, 16:07:36)
* AGREED: - 1161779 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a clear violation of
the Final criteria: "The installer must be able to detect (if
possible) and install to supported network-attached storage
devices."  (roshi, 16:14:04)

* (1162215) LV resize does not check filesystem minimum size  (roshi,
  16:14:09)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162215   (roshi,
16:14:09)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (roshi, 16:14:10)
* AGREED: - 11662215 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear 
violation
of the Final criterion: "Any installer mechanism for resizing
storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation."
(roshi, 16:25:09)

* (1158442) Gnome-initial-setup window doesn't fit to visible with small
  resolution  (roshi, 16:25:59)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158442   (roshi,
16:26:02)
  * Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup, MODIFIED  (roshi, 16:26:05)
* AGREED: - 1158442 - Punt - We're going to wait to decide on this
pending discussion and testing of an existing fix.  (roshi,
16:37:26)

* (986731) Dual boot of uefi Windows 7 and Fedora 19 fails to boot
  Windows  (roshi, 16:37:41)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986731   (roshi,
16:37:45)
  * Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW  (roshi, 16:37:47)
* AGREED: - 986731 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't seem to be
reproducible on F21. If it is, please update the bug and 
reproduce.
(roshi, 16:42:24)

* (1103496) Installer interface sometimes freezes for a while (but
  install continues, and screen eventually unfreezes)  (roshi, 16:42:27)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103496   (roshi,
16:42:30)
  * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 16:42:33)
* LINK:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
(kparal, 16:58:43)
  * AGREED: - 1103496 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a 
conditional
  violation of the Final Data Corruption criterion 
since it creates
  the opportunity of data loss to the user (by 
making them think the
  install has hung and the user restarts the 
machine mid-install).
  (roshi, 17:02:22)

* (1144613) [abrt] gnome-tweak-tool: gtk_tree_row_ref_deleted():
  python2.7 killed by SIGSEGV  (roshi, 17:02:37)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144613   (roshi,
17:02:40)
  * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:02:43)
* AGREED: - 1144613 - RejectedBlocker - The GNOME tweak tool is not 
a
default application for the Workstation product, so this is not
considered a blocker.  (roshi, 17:10:09)

* (1147670) keyboard layout chooser switches letters while typing
  (roshi, 17:10:18)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147670   (roshi,
17:10:21)
  * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:10:24)
* AGREED: - 1147670 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This
bug is difficult to reproduce and it seems to be very
system-dependant.  Accepting as an FE because if you do hit 
it, it
would be pretty obnoxious. Repropose if more solid 
reproduction
steps can be found or there is a concrete system on 
which it is
quite difficult to perform Fedora installation. 
 (roshi, 17:43:49)

* (1158968) AttributeError: 'DMRaidArrayDevice' object has no attribute
  'formatClass'  (roshi, 17:44:00)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158968   (roshi,
17:44:03)
  * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, MODIFIED  (roshi, 17:44:05)
* AGREED: - 1158968 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a violation of 
the
Beta Criterion: "The installer must be able to detect and 
install to
hardware or firmware RAID storage devices."  (roshi, 17:56:13)

* (1130794) Missing high contrast icon  (roshi, 17:56:21

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

[valent.turko...@gmail.com]

Please all of you with resume issues state if you are or are not using
luksCrypt to encrypt your drives. There is a chance that this is
systemd and luksCrypt issue.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 13:00 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with 
> > fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch
> >
> 
> Worse than I thought.
> 
> # rpm -e fedora-release-cloud
> error: Failed dependencies:
>   system-release-product is needed by (installed) 
> fedora-release-21-0.16.noarch
> # repoquery --whatprovides system-release-product
> generic-release-workstation-0:21-7.noarch
> fedora-release-server-0:21-0.16.noarch
> fedora-release-nonproduct-0:21-0.16.noarch
> fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
> fedora-release-server-0:21-0.16.noarch
> fedora-release-cloud-0:21-0.16.noarch
> generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
> fedora-release-nonproduct-0:21-0.16.noarch
> generic-release-server-0:21-7.noarch
> generic-release-nonproduct-0:21-7.noarch
> fedora-release-cloud-0:21-0.16.noarch
> generic-release-workstation-0:21-7.noarch
> generic-release-server-0:21-7.noarch
> generic-release-nonproduct-0:21-7.noarch
> fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
> generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
> 
> 
> Seems to me at some time a random generic dependency has been pulled in
> and now causes problems. 

Er, no? You have no generic package installed. All you're seeing is:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#environment-product-conflicts

it's a known issue, and somewhat tricky to do anything about.

> If memory serves correctly, this is a workstation
> install of Fedora 20,

There's no such thing - there were no Products for F20. 'yum update'ing
F20 to F21 tends to pull in fedora-release-cloud because it wins the
race to provide system-release-product. 'fedup' requires you to
explicitly choose a Product, avoiding that issue.

>  upgraded to Fedora 21 (on Aug 14th).
> 
> # rpm -e fedora-release-cloud --nodeps
> [...]
> # yum -y install fedora-release-workstation
> [...]
> ---> Package fedora-release-workstation.noarch 0:21-0.16 will be installed
> [...]
> Error: firewalld-config-standard conflicts with 
> fedora-release-workstation-21-0.16.noarch
> 
> Mad.

There's nothing really 'mad' about it, all the deps are sane (the point
is to use different default firewall configurations with different
Products), it's just a bit tricky to switch between products which pull
in deps. You can use yum shell to do it, though - set up a transaction
which removes one Product package and its associated deps and installs
the ones you want instead.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

rawhide report: 20141112 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

Compose started at Wed Nov 12 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686 requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libjson.so.0
[cab]
cab-0.1.9-12.fc22.i686 requires cabal-dev
[clementine]
clementine-1.2.3-1.fc22.i686 requires libcdio.so.15(CDIO_15)
clementine-1.2.3-1.fc22.i686 requires libcdio.so.15
[condor]
condor-plumage-8.1.4-7.a1a7df5.fc22.i686 requires libmongoclient.so
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudservers)
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[django-recaptcha]
django-recaptcha-0.1-7.20091212svn6.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[dnssec-check]
dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.i686 requires libval-threads.so.14
dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.i686 requires libsres.so.14
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires libLLVM-3.4.so
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[flush]
flush-0.9.12-10.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[gdesklet-SlideShow]
gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-16.fc21.noarch requires gdesklets
[gdesklets-citation]
gdesklets-citation-2.0-3.20120702git355e2ee.fc19.noarch requires 
gdesklets
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.i686 requires 
libvala-0.24.so.0
[ghc-hjsmin]
ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7-3.fc22.i686 requires 
libHSoptparse-applicative-0.9.0-ghc7.6.3.so
[glances]
glances-2.1.2-2.fc22.noarch requires python-psutil >= 0:2.0.0
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) >= 0:0.16.0
[iwhd]
iwhd-1.6-11.fc22.i686 requires libmongoclient.so
[juffed]
juffed-plugin-terminal-0.10-10.fc22.i686 requires libqtermwidget.so.0
[kdegraphics]
7:kdegraphics-4.14.3-1.fc22.noarch requires gwenview >= 0:4.14.3
[kmid2]
kmid2-2.4.0-7.fc22.i686 requires libdrumstick-file.so.0
kmid2-2.4.0-7.fc22.i686 requires libdrumstick-alsa.so.0
[leiningen]
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires maven-ant-tasks
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires classworlds
[libghemical]
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.i686 requires libf77blas.so.3
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.i686 requires libatlas.so.3
[libopensync-plugin-irmc]
1:libopensync-plugin-irmc-0.22-7.fc20.i686 requires libopenobex.so.1
[ltsp]
ltsp-client-5.4.5-8.fc21.i686 requires fuse-unionfs
ltsp-server-5.4.5-8.fc21.i686 requires cdialog
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.i686 requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.i686 requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
[monodevelop-vala]
monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.i686 requires vala < 0:0.25.0
[netdisco]
netdisco-1.1-7.fc21.noarch requires perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Bay)
[nwchem]
nwchem-openmpi-6.3.2-11.fc21.i686 requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
[openslides]
openslides-1.3.1-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django < 0:1.5
[openvas-client]
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_omp.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_nasl.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_misc.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_hg.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_base.so.6
[pootle]
pootle-2.1.6-8.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-askbot-fedmsg]
python-askbot-fedmsg-0.1.0-2.fc21.noarch requires askbot
[python-coffin]
python-coffin-0.3.7-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-addons]
python-django-addons-0.6.6-2.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-longerusername]
python-django-longerusername-0.4-5.20130204gite4e85d7d.fc21.noarch 
requires python-django14
[python-selenium]
python3-selenium-2.43.0-1.fc22.noarch requires python3-rdflib
[rubygem-linecache19]
rubygem-linecache19-0.5.13-6.fc20.i686 requires libruby.so.2.0
[rubygem-rubigen]
rubygem-rubigen-1.5.8-3.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) < 
0:3.2.0
[rubygem-ruby-debug-base19]
rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-6.fc20.i686 requires libruby.so.2.0
[shogun]
shogun-doc-3.2.0.1-0.27.git20140804.96f3cf3.fc22.noarch requires 
shogun-data = 0:0.8.1-0.18.git20140804.48a1abb.fc22
[sugar-tamtam]
sugar-tamtam-common-0-0.14.20100201git.fc22.i686 requires 
libcsound.so.5.2
[techne]
tec

F-21 Branched report: 20141112 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

Compose started at Wed Nov 12 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.armv7hl requires libjson.so.0
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blender]
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADAStreamWriter.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADASaxFrameworkLoader.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libOpenCOLLADABaseUtils.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libMathMLSolver.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libGeneratedSaxParser.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADAStreamWriter.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADASaxFrameworkLoader.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADABaseUtils.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libMathMLSolver.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libGeneratedSaxParser.so.0.1
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudservers)
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[django-recaptcha]
django-recaptcha-0.1-7.20091212svn6.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[flush]
flush-0.9.12-10.fc21.armv7hl requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[gdesklet-SlideShow]
gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-16.fc21.noarch requires gdesklets
[gdesklets-citation]
gdesklets-citation-2.0-3.20120702git355e2ee.fc19.noarch requires 
gdesklets
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libvala-0.24.so.0
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) >= 0:0.16.0
[gorm]
gorm-1.2.18-5.fc20.armv7hl requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.23
[juffed]
juffed-plugin-terminal-0.10-10.fc21.armv7hl requires libqtermwidget.so.0
[leiningen]
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires maven-ant-tasks
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires classworlds
[libghemical]
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libf77blas.so.3
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libatlas.so.3
[libopensync-plugin-irmc]
1:libopensync-plugin-irmc-0.22-7.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenobex.so.1
[ltsp]
ltsp-client-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires fuse-unionfs
ltsp-server-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires cdialog
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
[monodevelop-vala]
monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.armv7hl requires vala < 0:0.25.0
[netdisco]
netdisco-1.1-7.fc21.noarch requires perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Bay)
[ocaml-pa-do]
ocaml-pa-do-0.8.16-3.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) = 
0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
[openslides]
openslides-1.3.1-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django < 0:1.5
[openstack-nova]
openstack-nova-compute-2014.1.2-1.fc21.noarch requires 
libvirt-daemon-xen
[openvas-client]
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_omp.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_nasl.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_misc.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_hg.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_base.so.6
[php-pecl-sphinx]
php-pecl-sphinx-1.3.2-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libsphinxclient-0.0.1.so
[pootle]
pootle-2.1.6-8.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-askbot-fedmsg]
python-askbot-fedmsg-0.1.0-2.fc21.noarch requires askbot
[python-coffin]
python-coffin-0.3.7-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-addons]
python-django-addons-0.6.6-2.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-longerusername]
python-django-longerusername-0.4-5.20130204gite4e85d7d.fc21.noarch 
requires python-django14
[rubygem-linecache19]
rubygem-linecache19-0.5.13-6.fc20.armv7hl requires libruby.so.2.0
[rubygem-rubigen]
rubygem-rubigen-1.5.8-3.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) < 
0:3.2.0
[rubygem-ruby-debug-base19]
rubygem-ru

Re: Managing locked up desktops

[Kamil Paral]

> In relation to my video problems under 21 Beta
> 
> is there ANY way to deal with the locked up desktop other
> than hitting the power switch? When it's locked-up, ctrl-alt-F
> keys don't work..ctrl-alt-del doesn't work...and the last resort
> alt-sysreq doesn't work. I am really afraid of totally messing up
> the FS to the point where I am forced to remain in Debian.

Please note that sysrq is disabled by default in Fedora.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning

[Joerg Lechner]

Hi,
I tried this procedure, with the same result as Bidski had described.
I had now a chat with Nvidia Support. They gave me a link:
http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/132/kw/how%20to%20install%20linux%20drivers
So far I don't know, if this is helpful, anyway I will read and try.
Kind regards

 

 

-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- 
Von: Reynold 
An: test 
Verschickt: Di, 11 Nov 2014 6:48 pm
Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning


How to manually install NVIDIA graphics driver

using yum or dnf (I prefer dnf so I will use that)

#dnf clean all
#dnf update
#dnf install gcc kernel-devel dkms

download NVIDIA driver from nvidia.com and cd to the download directory
#chmod +x NVIDIA-XXX.run (the NVIDIA driver, for instance 
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)

#vi /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf and insert a line with text 
"blacklist nouveau" (without quotes)
#vi /etc/sysconfig/grub and insert this text 
"rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau" (without quotes) and the end
of the line beginning with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= making sure the text is 
inside the last quotation mark

#grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg

#dnf remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.x86x_64 (this is 64bit driver - if you 
have a 32bit operating system it will be 32bit driver)

#reboot

When you are in grub and the and your operating system kernel is 
highlighted as the one you are booting to press the "e" on the keyboard 
to edit the line
Then at the end of this line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT= still inside 
the ending quotes insert this text "init 3" (without quotes)
press F10 to reboot

you should then come to a command prompt where you log on as a root user
cd to the download directory where the NVIDIA driver located
#./NVIDIA-XXX.run (for instance ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)
The NVIDIA installer will start
Accept the license agreement
Install 32 bit compatibility (if you are on a 64bit machine)
Choose to automatically update nvidia-xconfig-utility

reboot and log into graphical mode or from command line using root init 5

Hope this helps

Reynold

On 11/10/2014 11:49 PM, Bidski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you instruct me in how you installed the nVidia drivers?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> "Joerg Lechner" 
>
> To:
> , 
> Cc:
>
> Sent:
> Tue, 11 Nov 2014 02:18:35 -0500
> Subject:
> Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning
>
>
> Hi,
> on my laptop there is a Nvidia Geforce 840M (Acer Aspire E15, E5
> 571G). I didn't have any problems with the grafics drivers so far.
> Currently running F21 Final TC1.
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
> Von: Bidski 
> An: test 
> Verschickt: Mo, 10 Nov 2014 10:05 pm
> Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
> partitioning
>
>
> Has anyone had success installing the nVidia drivers in F21 yet?
> I am meeting some strange issues following the instructions for
> installing them in F20. Including this page
> (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9de7q9llhlamf32/IMG_20141110_192627.jpg?dl=0)
> displaying while booting after installing the drivers.
>
> I will generate some better diagnostics tonight.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> "Adam Williamson"  >
>
> To:
> "Bidski" mailto:bid...@iinet.net.au>>,
> "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>  >
> Cc:
>
> Sent:
> Sun, 09 Nov 2014 23:38:19 -0800
> Subject:
> Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
> partitioning
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:28 +1100, Bidski wrote:
> >
> > After shifting the partitions on my HDD up by about 200 MiB
> and then
> > using gdisk to convert the disk to GPT (did it this way to
> try and
> > preserve the existing Windows partitions), the Fedora
> installer now
> > only recognises my HDD as a multipath device.
>
> > I also looked at the F21 Common Bugs page on the wiki. There
> is a
> > section there talking about multipath device issue. I
> created edited
> > the /etc/multipath.conf file to have the contents specified
> but the
> > installer still treats all devices as multipaths.
> >
> > Any suggestions here?
>
> I wrote the CommonBugs note blind - I couldn't test that the
> proposed
> workaround would actually work as I haven't reproduced the bug.
>
> However, it shouldn't happen if you use a non-live install
> image, so I'd
> suggest that. You can use the 'Server' network install image
> to install
> any package set, not just Server, so try using that.
> -- 
> A