Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180914.n.0 changes

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180913.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180914.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  5
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages:   121
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  2.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages:3.86 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   4.35 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   6.87 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20180914.n.0.s390x.tar.xz
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20180914.n.0.s390x.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: lua-cqueues-20171014-0.fc30
Summary: Stackable Continuation Queues for the Lua Programming Language
RPMs:lua-cqueues lua-cqueues-compat lua-cqueues-doc
Size:1.93 MiB

Package: python-curio-0.9-1.fc30
Summary: Building blocks for performing concurrent I/O
RPMs:python3-curio
Size:134.98 KiB

Package: python-h11-0.8.1-1.fc30
Summary: A pure-Python, bring-your-own-I/O implementation of HTTP/1.1
RPMs:python3-h11
Size:93.73 KiB

Package: python-j1m.sphinxautozconfig-0.1.0-3.fc30
Summary: Sphinx support for ZConfig
RPMs:python2-j1m.sphinxautozconfig python3-j1m.sphinxautozconfig
Size:26.93 KiB

Package: python-sniffio-1.0.0-1.fc30
Summary: Sniff out which async library your code is running under
RPMs:python3-sniffio
Size:20.25 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: collectd-ceilometer-plugin-1.0.1-7.fc29
Summary: OpenStack Ceilometer plugin for collectd
RPMs:python-collectd-ceilometer-plugin-doc 
python2-collectd-ceilometer-plugin python3-collectd-ceilometer-plugin
Size:274.21 KiB

Package: gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-33.fc29
Summary: The sources for additional PyGNOME Python extension modules
RPMs:gnome-python2-desktop gnome-python2-gnomedesktop 
gnome-python2-gnomekeyring gnome-python2-libgtop2 gnome-python2-libwnck 
gnome-python2-rsvg gnome-python2-totem
Size:857.09 KiB

Package: pymunk-1.0.0-17.fc29
Summary: Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine
RPMs:pymunk
Size:132.87 KiB

Package: python-flatland-0.0.2-16.fc29
Summary: HTML form management and validation
RPMs:python2-flatland
Size:125.20 KiB

Package: python-imdb-5.1-9.fc29
Summary: Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database
RPMs:python2-imdb
Size:2.26 MiB

Package: python-wokkel-0.7.1-13.fc29
Summary: Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation
RPMs:python2-wokkel
Size:253.57 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  IQmol-2.11.0-1.fc30
Old package:  IQmol-2.10.0-2.fc29
Summary:  A free open-source molecular editor and visualization package
RPMs: IQmol IQmol-samples
Size: 35.43 MiB
Size change:  -667.96 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 13 2018 Susi Lehtola  - 2.11.0-1
  - Update to 2.11.0.


Package:  OpenMolcas-18.0-5.o180813.1752.fc30
Old package:  OpenMolcas-18.0-4.o180813.1752.fc30
Summary:  A multiconfigurational quantum chemistry software package
RPMs: OpenMolcas
Size: 112.98 MiB
Size change:  174.69 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Sep 12 2018 Susi Lehtola  - 
18.0-5.o180813.1752
  - Add missing python modules and wrapper.


Package:  SuperLU-5.2.1-5.fc30
Old package:  SuperLU-5.2.1-4.fc29
Summary:  Subroutines to solve sparse linear systems
RPMs: SuperLU SuperLU-devel SuperLU-doc
Size: 7.15 MiB
Size change:  -29.76 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 14 2018 Antonio Trande  - 5.2.1-5
  - Remove gcc-gfortran as required package


Package:  aom-1.0.0-4.fc30
Old package:  aom-1.0.0-3.fc30
Summary:  Royalty-free next-generation video format
RPMs: aom aom-extra-tools libaom libaom-devel
Added RPMs:   aom-extra-tools libaom libaom-devel
Dropped RPMs: aom-devel
Size: 9.71 MiB
Size change:  631.34 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 13 2018 Robert-Andr?? Mauchin  - 1.0.0-4
  - Split the package into libs/tools


Package:  authselect-1.0-3.fc30
Old package:  authselect-1.0-2.fc30
Summary:  Configures authentication and identity sources from supported 
profiles
RPMs: authselect authselect-compat authselect-devel authselect-libs
Size: 1.11 MiB
Size change:  7.35 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 14 2018 Pavel B??ezina  - 1.0-3
  - Scriptlets should no produce any error messages (RHBZ #1622272)
  - Provide fix for pwquality configuration (RHBZ #1618865)


Package:  brial-1.2.4-1.fc30
Old package:  brial-1.2.3-3.fc29
Summary:  Framework for Boolean Rings
RPMs: brial brial-devel python2-brial python3-brial
Size: 6.50 MiB
Size change:  -32.22 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 13 2018 Jerry James  - 1.2.4-1
  - New upstream version


Package:  cassandra-3.11.1-7.fc30
Old package:  cassandra-3.11.1-6.fc30
Summary:  Client utilities

[Test-Announce] 2018-09-17 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson 
# F29 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-09-17
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers, 6 proposed Beta freeze
exceptions and 8 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
review meeting on Monday (those numbers may change over the weekend).

If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting -  the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .

We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the 
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not 
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F29 can be found on the 
wiki [0].

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, 
check out these links:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting 
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out 
the SOP on the wiki:
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

Have a good weekend and see you Monday!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-09-17 Fedora QA Meeting

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson 
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We're still
focused on F29 Beta at the moment, though please do take a minute to
look at the firmware RAID criterion proposal. There will be a blocker
review meeting at 16:00 UTC, please come to that if you can.

If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 29-20180912.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora compose checker 
Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 279984  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279984
ID: 279991  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279991
ID: 28  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/28
ID: 280006  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280006
ID: 280078  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280078

Soft failed openQA tests: 10/132 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 279942  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279942
ID: 279943  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279943
ID: 279968  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279968
ID: 279969  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279969
ID: 279970  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279970
ID: 279971  Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279971
ID: 279972  Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279972
ID: 279974  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279974
ID: 279993  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279993
ID: 280044  Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280044
ID: 280047  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280047
ID: 280048  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280048
ID: 280081  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280081

Passed openQA tests: 119/132 (x86_64), 20/24 (i386)

Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 158
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: More F29-beta dnf update erros

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 15:34 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:28 ago on Fri 14 Sep 2018 02:56:09 
> PM EDT.
> Dependencies resolved.
> 
>   Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.fc29.armv7hl
>- package bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled
>   Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> libpeas-1.22.0-9.fc29.armv7hl
>- package libpeas-1.22.0-9.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled
>   Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> libpeas-gtk-1.22.0-9.fc29.armv7hl
>- package libpeas-gtk-1.22.0-9.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled
>   Problem 4: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
> perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.076-1.fc29.noarch
>- package perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.076-1.module_2073+eebc5b71.noarch is disabled
> Nothing to do.
> Complete!

This is known, and harmless. Basically if there's a newer build of a
package you have installed in a modular repo, but you don't have the
relevant module enabled, you'll get this. dnf should really just detect
that this is a fairly 'normal' situation and not print this message,
but it doesn't indicate any sort of problem.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616118
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

More F29-beta dnf update erros

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz 

dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:28 ago on Fri 14 Sep 2018 02:56:09 
PM EDT.

Dependencies resolved.

 Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.fc29.armv7hl

  - package bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled
 Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
libpeas-1.22.0-9.fc29.armv7hl

  - package libpeas-1.22.0-9.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled
 Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
libpeas-gtk-1.22.0-9.fc29.armv7hl

  - package libpeas-gtk-1.22.0-9.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled
 Problem 4: cannot install the best update candidate for package 
perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.076-1.fc29.noarch

  - package perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.076-1.module_2073+eebc5b71.noarch is disabled
Nothing to do.
Complete!
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz 



On 9/14/18 3:09 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

"RM" == Robert Moskowitz  writes:

RM> Where would I put a 36K output file?

Honestly I figured you would look at the output yourself to see if
anything stands out.  Though you redirected stdout and not stderr,
and so the output you pasted showed the only error output by that
command anyway, and it's not indicative of any problem.  So that was my
one idea exhausted.


sometimes I wish I had the skillset to look at such an output and figure 
out what is off and then do something about it.


It was pretty interesting that I just HAPPENED to look at the console 
and catch that error.  Most of the times, I start an update and go do 
something else.


___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III 
> "RM" == Robert Moskowitz  writes:

RM> Where would I put a 36K output file?

Honestly I figured you would look at the output yourself to see if
anything stands out.  Though you redirected stdout and not stderr,
and so the output you pasted showed the only error output by that
command anyway, and it's not indicative of any problem.  So that was my
one idea exhausted.

 - J<
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz 



On 9/14/18 2:43 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

"RM" == Robert Moskowitz  writes:

RM> New f29-beta for armfhp.  Just ran dnf update and caught this go
RM> across the screen...

RM> /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
RM> warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl) scriptlet failed,
RM> exit status 1

Bizarre; anaconda just has:

%postun widgets -p /sbin/ldconfig

Technically that should have been removed in F28, but that's not really
the problem.  Do you get anything useful when running ldconfig -v as
root?  It's possible that something in /etc/ld.so.conf.d is malformed.
It's possible that anaconda-widgets is unrelated except for being the
first thing you noticed that's run ldconfig.  Very little actually needs
to run it these days.


I get more than 600 lines of output from that command.  So I tried 
piping it to a file...


ldconfig -v > l.lst
ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib' given more than once
[root@localhost ~]# ls -ls
total 56
 4 -rw-rw-r--. 1 root root  2966 Sep 13 12:26 anaconda-ks.cfg
 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root  3348 Sep 14 12:50 initial-setup-ks.cfg
36 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 36197 Sep 14 14:55 l.lst

Where would I put a 36K output file?

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III 
> "RM" == Robert Moskowitz  writes:

RM> New f29-beta for armfhp.  Just ran dnf update and caught this go
RM> across the screen...

RM> /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
RM> warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl) scriptlet failed,
RM> exit status 1

Bizarre; anaconda just has:

%postun widgets -p /sbin/ldconfig

Technically that should have been removed in F28, but that's not really
the problem.  Do you get anything useful when running ldconfig -v as
root?  It's possible that something in /etc/ld.so.conf.d is malformed.
It's possible that anaconda-widgets is unrelated except for being the
first thing you noticed that's run ldconfig.  Very little actually needs
to run it these days.

 - J<
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180912.n.0 changes

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora Branched Report 
OLD: Fedora-29-20180911.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180912.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  3
Added packages:  3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   103
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  90.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages:134.08 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.18 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -6.27 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: AtomicHost qcow2 x86_64
Path: AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20180911.n.0.x86_64.qcow2
Image: Scientific_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-x86_64-29-20180911.n.0.iso
Image: AtomicHost raw-xz x86_64
Path: AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20180911.n.0.x86_64.raw.xz

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: amtk-5.0.0-2.fc29
Summary: Actions, Menus and Toolbars Kit for GTK+ applications
RPMs:amtk amtk-devel amtk-tests
Size:738.22 KiB

Package: gtksourceview4-4.0.3-2.fc29
Summary: Source code editing widget
RPMs:gtksourceview4 gtksourceview4-devel gtksourceview4-tests
Size:9.83 MiB

Package: mozjs60-60.1.0-1.fc29
Summary: SpiderMonkey JavaScript library
RPMs:mozjs60 mozjs60-devel
Size:79.89 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: python-pypubsub3.3.0-3.3.0-2.fc29
Summary: Python Publish-Subscribe Package
RPMs:python2-pypubsub
Size:134.08 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.111-1.fc29
Old package:  abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.101-2.fc29
Summary:  Humanist sans serif font
RPMs: abattis-cantarell-fonts
Size: 242.34 KiB
Size change:  43.89 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 07 2018 Kalev Lember  - 0.111-1
  - Update to 0.111


Package:  adwaita-icon-theme-3.30.0-1.fc29
Old package:  adwaita-icon-theme-3.29.90-1.fc29
Summary:  Adwaita icon theme
RPMs: adwaita-cursor-theme adwaita-icon-theme adwaita-icon-theme-devel
Size: 12.07 MiB
Size change:  3.32 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 06 2018 Kalev Lember  - 3.30.0-1
  - Update to 3.30.0


Package:  aisleriot-1:3.22.6-1.fc29
Old package:  aisleriot-1:3.22.5-2.fc29
Summary:  A collection of card games
RPMs: aisleriot
Size: 35.35 MiB
Size change:  -41.36 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Sep 04 2018 Kalev Lember  - 1:3.22.6-1
  - Update to 3.22.6


Package:  anjuta-1:3.28.0-7.fc29
Old package:  anjuta-1:3.28.0-5.fc29
Summary:  GNOME IDE for various programming languages (including C/C++, 
Python, Vala and JavaScript)
RPMs: anjuta anjuta-devel
Size: 34.43 MiB
Size change:  2.82 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 07 2018 Kalev Lember  - 1:3.28.0-6
  - Rebuilt for libdevhelp soname bump

  * Fri Sep 07 2018 Kalev Lember  - 1:3.28.0-7
  - Rebuilt against fixed atk (#1626575)


Package:  at-spi2-atk-2.30.0-1.fc29
Old package:  at-spi2-atk-2.26.2-2.fc29
Summary:  A GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi
RPMs: at-spi2-atk at-spi2-atk-devel
Size: 517.38 KiB
Size change:  -16.25 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 06 2018 Kalev Lember  - 2.30.0-1
  - Update to 2.30.0
  - Switch to the meson build system
  - Remove ldconfig scriptlets


Package:  at-spi2-core-2.30.0-2.fc29
Old package:  at-spi2-core-2.28.0-4.fc29
Summary:  Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi
RPMs: at-spi2-core at-spi2-core-devel
Size: 1.69 MiB
Size change:  12.71 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 06 2018 Kalev Lember  - 2.30.0-1
  - Update to 2.30.0

  * Fri Sep 07 2018 Kalev Lember  - 2.30.0-2
  - Rebuilt against fixed atk (#1626575)


Package:  atk-2.30.0-1.fc29
Old package:  atk-2.28.1-2.fc29
Summary:  Interfaces for accessibility support
RPMs: atk atk-devel
Size: 2.54 MiB
Size change:  -4.54 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 06 2018 Kalev Lember  - 2.29.92-1
  - Update to 2.29.92
  - Switch to the meson build system
  - Remove ldconfig scriptlets

  * Fri Sep 07 2018 Kalev Lember  - 2.29.92-2
  - Revert a commit that broke introspection (#1626575)

  * Mon Sep 10 2018 Kalev Lember  - 2.30.0-1
  - Update to 2.30.0


Package:  atomix-3.30.0.1-1.fc29
Old package:  atomix-3.22.0-7.fc29
Summary:  Puzzle game: Build molecules out of isolated atoms
RPMs: atomix
Size: 2.83 MiB
Size change:  -3.33 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 07 2018 Kalev Lember  - 3.30.0.1-1
  - Update to 3.30.0.1
  - Switch to the meson build system


Package:  baobab-3.30.0-1.fc29
Old package:  baobab-3.28.0-3.fc29
Summary:  A graphical directory tree analyzer
RPMs: baobab
Size: 2.31 MiB
Size change:  -68.89 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 07 2018 Kalev Lember  - 3.30.0-1
  - Update to 3.30.0


Package:  bijiben-3.30.0-1.fc29
Old package:  bijiben-3.29.90-1.fc29
Summary:  Simple Note Viewer
RPMs: bijiben
Size: 3.32 MiB
Size change:  31.19 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 06 2018 Kalev Lember  - 3.30.0-1
  - Update to 3.30.0

errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz 
New f29-beta for armfhp.  Just ran dnf update and caught this go across 
the screen...


  Running scriptlet: anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl    
173/190

/sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl) scriptlet 
failed, exit status 1

Error in POSTUN scriptlet in rpm package anaconda-widgets
Error in POSTUN scriptlet in rpm package anaconda-widgets


___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Beta status is No-Go

2018-09-14 Thread Ben Cotton 
Due to in-progress RC2 for the F29 Beta release and presence of
blocker bugs, the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one
week to “Target #1” date (September 25th)[1]. We are not going to slip
the Final GA yet.

For more information please check the minutes from the F29 Beta
Go/No-Go meeting [2].

The next Go/No-Go meeting will be held Thursday, 2018-09-20 at 1700
UTC in #fedora-meeting-1.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule
[2] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-09-13/f29-beta-go_no_go-meeting.2018-09-13-17.00.html

-- 
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz 



On 9/14/18 1:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I
installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network
installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28,
the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I
log in, it takes a long time to come up with a desktop.

This machine has an AMD "Bonaire" GPU and I've had plenty of kernel
and Wayland / X issues with it over the years, so my first guess is
that this is kernel / GPU related and not something everyone is
seeing. But before I go collecting log files I'm curious if other
people are seeing this.

Here I thought it was my Cubieboard2 armv7!  Xfce is sooo slow local; 
real step down from F28.  Remote via VNC is peppy, as you might expect 
(my x86_64 notebook doing most of the graphic heavy lifting).


I see the latest build has -34 in it.  So I am downloading it and will test.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Proposal to modify release criteria for fwraid

2018-09-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher 
At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status
of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID
device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be
a blocker for Beta, many of the people present at the meeting
disagreed, for a variety of reasons.

* Hardware supporting fwraid is considerably less pervasive than it
was when the criterion was written

* Testing this criterion can only be done with install media, which
limits our testing pool to the very dedicated members of Fedora QA.
Yes, anyone *can* download a nightly compose and try it, but in
practice this tends to be limited to the core testers. The majority of
testing that this feature will get will tend to happen as people try
out the Beta release.

To that end, I'd like to propose that we make the following change to
the criteria going forward:

"The blocking criterion for successful installation atop a firmware
RAID array is moved to the GA release criteria."
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

2018-09-14 Thread Alessio Ciregia 
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
> Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic*
> operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on
> what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found?


FWIW, I never hit such problem.
The only way to get in troubles consists in hammering the history.sqlite file:
echo 1 > /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite

Now almost all dnf operations fails (except dnf search):

dnf update
...
RuntimeError: C++ std::exception: Exec failed: file is not a database

And in the journal:
Sep 14 10:20:11 hostname python3[8830]: detected unhandled Python
exception in '/usr/bin/dnf'
Sep 14 10:20:11 hostname abrt-notification[8856]: Process 8830 (dnf)
of user 0 encountered an uncaught RuntimeError exception
-- Subject: ABRT has detected an uncaught RuntimeError exception in dnf
...

Deleting the "corrupted" history.sqlite, it restores the normal situation.

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 23:57 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
>  wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal
> >  wrote:
> > > What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least
> > > selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29.
> > 
> > Well - almost ;-)
> > 
> > $ dnf list installed | grep -i selinux
> > container-selinux.noarch
> > 2:2.71-2.git5721d74.fc29@fedora
> > libselinux.x86_64 2.8-3.fc29
> >@fedora
> > libselinux-utils.x86_64   2.8-3.fc29
> >@fedora
> > python3-libselinux.x86_64 2.8-3.fc29
> >@fedora
> > rpm-plugin-selinux.x86_64 4.14.2-1.fc29
> >@fedora
> > selinux-policy.noarch 3.14.2-32.fc29
> >@fedora
> > selinux-policy-targeted.noarch3.14.2-32.fc29
> >@fedora
> > 
> > Let me try disabling selinux.
> 
> Disabling selinux fixed it. I assume this is already in bugzilla.
> Thanks everyone!

It's already fixed in -34.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal
 wrote:
> What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least
> selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29.

Well - almost ;-)

$ dnf list installed | grep -i selinux
container-selinux.noarch
2:2.71-2.git5721d74.fc29@fedora
libselinux.x86_64 2.8-3.fc29
   @fedora
libselinux-utils.x86_64   2.8-3.fc29
   @fedora
python3-libselinux.x86_64 2.8-3.fc29
   @fedora
rpm-plugin-selinux.x86_64 4.14.2-1.fc29
   @fedora
selinux-policy.noarch 3.14.2-32.fc29
   @fedora
selinux-policy-targeted.noarch3.14.2-32.fc29
   @fedora

Let me try disabling selinux.
>
> Dne pá 14. 9. 2018 8:03 uživatel Aleksandar Kurtakov 
> napsal:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I
>>> installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network
>>> installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28,
>>> the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I
>>> log in, it takes a long time to come up with a desktop.
>>>
>>> This machine has an AMD "Bonaire" GPU and I've had plenty of kernel
>>> and Wayland / X issues with it over the years, so my first guess is
>>> that this is kernel / GPU related and not something everyone is
>>> seeing. But before I go collecting log files I'm curious if other
>>> people are seeing this.
>>
>>
>> I experience this kind of slowness too (Intel).
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Markovs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!
>>> ___
>>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives:
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Kurtakov
>> Red Hat Eclipse Team
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
Mastering DFS Analytics https://leanpub.com/masteringdfsanalytics

Markovs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Lukas Ruzicka 
>
> Disabling selinux fixed it. I assume this is already in bugzilla.
> Thanks everyone!
>

Hello,
what do you mean by disabling SElinux? I do not recommend to disable it
completely. Instead, set it to "permissive" mode. With this settings,
SElinux will not be any obstacle to you, but it will still track all issues
and it will still be context aware.
If you disable it, you will have relabel all files before you will want to
switch it on again.

To set SElinux to permissive mode:

1. Modify the kernel line in GRUB: Press "e" and then add "enforcing=0" to
the kernel line, and press CTRL-X. This will boot the computer with SElinux
in permissive mode once.
2. To make it persistent: Edit the /etc/selinux/config file and make sure
the SELINUX variable is set to "permissive" instead of "enforcing".

Happy Fedoring.




> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 

Lukáš Růžička

FEDORA QE, RHCE

Red Hat



Purkyňova 115

612 45 Brno - Královo Pole

lruzi...@redhat.com
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal
>  wrote:
>> What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least
>> selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29.
>
> Well - almost ;-)
>
> $ dnf list installed | grep -i selinux
> container-selinux.noarch
> 2:2.71-2.git5721d74.fc29@fedora
> libselinux.x86_64 2.8-3.fc29
>@fedora
> libselinux-utils.x86_64   2.8-3.fc29
>@fedora
> python3-libselinux.x86_64 2.8-3.fc29
>@fedora
> rpm-plugin-selinux.x86_64 4.14.2-1.fc29
>@fedora
> selinux-policy.noarch 3.14.2-32.fc29
>@fedora
> selinux-policy-targeted.noarch3.14.2-32.fc29
>@fedora
>
> Let me try disabling selinux.

Disabling selinux fixed it. I assume this is already in bugzilla.
Thanks everyone!
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal 
What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at
least selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29.

Dne pá 14. 9. 2018 8:03 uživatel Aleksandar Kurtakov 
napsal:

>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 
> wrote:
>
>> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I
>> installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network
>> installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28,
>> the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I
>> log in, it takes a long time to come up with a desktop.
>>
>> This machine has an AMD "Bonaire" GPU and I've had plenty of kernel
>> and Wayland / X issues with it over the years, so my first guess is
>> that this is kernel / GPU related and not something everyone is
>> seeing. But before I go collecting log files I'm curious if other
>> people are seeing this.
>>
>
> I experience this kind of slowness too (Intel).
>
>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Markovs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse Team
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov 
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 
wrote:

> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I
> installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network
> installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28,
> the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I
> log in, it takes a long time to come up with a desktop.
>
> This machine has an AMD "Bonaire" GPU and I've had plenty of kernel
> and Wayland / X issues with it over the years, so my first guess is
> that this is kernel / GPU related and not something everyone is
> seeing. But before I go collecting log files I'm curious if other
> people are seeing this.
>

I experience this kind of slowness too (Intel).


>
> --
>
> Markovs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.
> fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org