Re: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"
On 11/10/2011 02:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > In that case I wouldn't bother. It's been around a long time anyway, I > think. As I added in the bug, it occurred way back when GTK2 was the only player in town. It was fixed then. Now we have GTK3 and another Requires needs to be added to gnome-packagekit. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 12:32 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 11/10/2011 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > That's odd, the message should be harmless and not cause apps to > > fail...but if it does, yeah, commonbugs it. > > It is not going to cause applications to fail, but it will cause lots of > people to file bugs. > > I've updated the bug and closed a bunch of duplicates. In that case I wouldn't bother. It's been around a long time anyway, I think. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"
On 11/10/2011 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > That's odd, the message should be harmless and not cause apps to > fail...but if it does, yeah, commonbugs it. It is not going to cause applications to fail, but it will cause lots of people to file bugs. I've updated the bug and closed a bunch of duplicates. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 08:01 -0500, Richard Ryniker wrote: > This is bug 747449, presumably just a case of a missing dependency. I > bumped into it when I invoked system-config-users. Because multiple > applications fail, and therefore can inflict pain on many users, does it > make sense to add something to "Common Bugs"? > > The work-around (install PackageKit-gtk3-module) is simple. My concern > is with the number of users who may have to learn what to do. I expect > then to look at Common Bugs, but a BZ search is a larger effort. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747449 That's odd, the message should be harmless and not cause apps to fail...but if it does, yeah, commonbugs it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"
This is bug 747449, presumably just a case of a missing dependency. I bumped into it when I invoked system-config-users. Because multiple applications fail, and therefore can inflict pain on many users, does it make sense to add something to "Common Bugs"? The work-around (install PackageKit-gtk3-module) is simple. My concern is with the number of users who may have to learn what to do. I expect then to look at Common Bugs, but a BZ search is a larger effort. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747449 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
