Re: Request for Fedora QA Group
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:41 AM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: conditions for joining the group. If you confirm, via the same ticket and via this list, that you have satisfied the requirements, then the mentor will sponsor your request once an application to join the That was a type and I left a word out! That should have said: If you confirm, via the same ticket and NOT via this list, that you have satisfied the requirements, then the mentor will sponsor your request -- mike c -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Request for Fedora QA Group
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:26 +0530, Sawrub wrote: On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, James Laska wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA FAS groups. Any other groups are ignored / not used. Thanks, James Ok thats too is fine, so how can i join/ be a member of proven testers. Filing a ticket as mentioned http://tinyurl.com/2czpxok does not seem to work [please change if not applicable ]. Besides all please approve my request for the proven testers group. The group you have to apply to is 'proventesters' rather than 'qa', but you should also file a ticket, yes. When you say it 'doesn't work' do you mean you couldn't manage to file a ticket, or you filed a ticket and no-one responded? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net i was not logged in when i saw the page and was not able to figure out how to use it for filing ticket. Now i got an idea, but probably there should be more text to guide first time visitors like me. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Request for Fedora QA Group
AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. - - iarlyy selbir :wq! On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Sawrub luckysharm...@gmail.com wrote: I just noticed that i'm still not a member of 'Fedora QA Group' and my request stands Unapproved. Please approve my request for the same. A brief summary about me : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sawrub -- Saurabh Sharma Linux user number: 490644 http://sawrub-blog.blogspot.com/ Open your doors...It's time to look beyond Windows -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Request for Fedora QA Group
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA FAS groups. Any other groups are ignored / not used. Is there some reason to keep that group? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Request for Fedora QA Group
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA FAS groups. Any other groups are ignored / not used. Is there some reason to keep that group? I can't think of one right now, other than the possibility that at some point we may have a need for process/access the is restricted to a subset of QA members. But as it stands now, there aren't any secret QA process or tools that require special group membership. Perhaps it would make sense to change the group to be invite only, and update the group description to note this is not an actively managed group? Thanks, James signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Request for Fedora QA Group
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:17 PM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA FAS groups. Any other groups are ignored / not used. Is there some reason to keep that group? I can't think of one right now, other than the possibility that at some point we may have a need for process/access the is restricted to a subset of QA members. But as it stands now, there aren't any secret QA process or tools that require special group membership. Perhaps it would make sense to change the group to be invite only, and update the group description to note this is not an actively managed group? Thanks, James -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test +1 as someone how has applied for that group in the past only to find out no riding lessons, no pony. tk009 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
