[Therion] Aven colour by date and loop error

2014-07-09 Thread Bruce
>On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 02:23:41PM +1200, Bruce wrote:
>> Also, I presume that colour by date in Aven refers to 'survey date'.  
>> Is colour by 'exploration date' something that has been considered?
>
>It's whatever you put in the *date commands - that's expected to be the
survey date, but it isn't currently used for anything like >autocomputing
the declination.  But that doesn't really help if you want both dates
available.

In therion the date is used for survey date and explo-date is used for
discovery/exploration date.  In therion the date IS used to calculate
declinations where there is also a coordinate system specified.
It would be nice to maintain this level of compatibility across the two.

Bruce




[Therion] Symbol different in legend to survey

2014-07-09 Thread Jenny Black
Hi,

Sorry, I should have replied sooner. You are both right of course, the
symbols are the same size. It was an optical illusion due to the shape of
some of the area fills in the original survey (
http://expo.survex.com/expoimages/surveys/107-plan-2013-draft3.pdf), and
once I could see it there I convinced myself it was true in the cut down
example as well. Sorry to have wasted your time!

Thanks,
Jenny


On 26 June 2014 20:28, Stacho Mudrak  wrote:

> Hi Jenny,
>
> this is magnification from your PDF file. Legend and map. To me, symbols
> look to be in the same scale. I am probably getting something wrong.
>
> S.
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20140709/9c785d4f/attachment.html>


[Therion] Therion database web interface (Bruce)

2014-07-09 Thread Dave Clucas
I’ve looked at the sql output in the past and haven’t been able to use much 
of the data, parts of it such as maps seem to be undocumented.
Your request has caused me to look again. I’m not sure you’ll be able to do 
the things you want.

I have a cave system (Whiterock in Mulu) which has 123 surveys listed in the 
database. Each survey has a unique id and a name apart from the first record 
which has an id of 1 and no name. All the surveys have a parent id of 1 apart 
from the first record which has a parent id of 0.

If I look at the maps table there are 120 records and all are referenced to 
survey id 1 which is obviously the top level survey so I can’t identify which 
survey each map belongs to. I’ve tried creating a container survey to contain 
all the sub surveys but, when I do, all maps are referenced to that container 
survey

Similarly, if I look at the scraps table, all the scraps are referenced to the 
master survey.

My index file has a map for plans and a map for elevations. Each of the maps 
contains all the scraps for that elevation.
In addition all surveys have their own plan and elevation maps so that I can 
print out each survey map separately.

I then  created a master map which contained each of the individual survey maps 
but all the individual maps are still referenced to the master survey.

What I’ve not tried to do is create a sql output for each survey. I’m sure 
that wouldn’t work anyway as the sql creates new tables and doesn’t append 
records. This means you would have to create a separate database for each 
survey and there would be no easy way of linking them.

I have done some work on Andrews code and when I’m satisfied with the results 
I’ll post on the Wiki.

Dave Clucas
daveclucas.com
sarawak-caves.com
dave.clucas at icloud.com

Exploring the World - One cave at a time


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20140709/59f5ce16/attachment.html>


[Therion] Symbol different in legend to survey

2014-07-09 Thread Footleg
Nice drawing Jenny. You appear to be using similar tricks to me to try
to join scraps along curved pitch lines so that in colour by altitude
the colour boundaries are hidden along drawn boundaries in the cave.
I've been meaning to write a wiki page about how I do this. Nice to
see I am not the only one.

Footleg

On 9 July 2014 06:47, Jenny Black  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I should have replied sooner. You are both right of course, the
> symbols are the same size. It was an optical illusion due to the shape of
> some of the area fills in the original survey
> (http://expo.survex.com/expoimages/surveys/107-plan-2013-draft3.pdf), and
> once I could see it there I convinced myself it was true in the cut down
> example as well. Sorry to have wasted your time!
>
> Thanks,
> Jenny
>
>
>
> On 26 June 2014 20:28, Stacho Mudrak  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jenny,
>>
>> this is magnification from your PDF file. Legend and map. To me, symbols
>> look to be in the same scale. I am probably getting something wrong.
>>
>> S.
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Therion mailing list
> Therion at speleo.sk
> http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
>



[Therion] svg black parts

2014-07-09 Thread Dirk Peinelt
I have an issue with black-parts in the embedded svg in extensible HTML
export.

The problem is separated in the attachment.

There are some invisible borders with area objects. One of them is shown in
black.

The pdf export looks fine. 



Is this a svg export bug or a symbol problem.

Have anyone an idea to bypass this, with the same symbol?



If the order of the objects will be changed, the black-part is then a
another of the area objects.



Thanks,

/d

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20140709/e6e19deb/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: part.zip
Type: application/x-zip-compressed
Size: 349178 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20140709/e6e19deb/attachment.bin>